Amazon Under Fire Over Auschwitz 'Christmas Ornaments'
Last edited Sun Dec 1, 2019, 04:51 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: DW/Deutsche Welle
The Auschwitz Memorial has criticized a shop on Amazon for selling Christmas ornaments with images of the Nazi concentration camp. The memorial urged the online store to remove the "disrespectful" items.
A shop on Amazon has come under fire for selling Christmas tree ornaments and other products featuring pictures of the Auschwitz concentration camp. In a post on Twitter, the Auschwitz-Birkenau memorial museum flagged at least four items being sold on Amazon with pictures of the camp on them including ornaments in the shape of a bell and a six-pointed star, as well as bottle openers.
"Auschwitz on a bottle opener is rather disturbing and disrespectful," the museum wrote Sunday. It urged the online retail giant to remove the items. The shop describes the items as "travel souvenirs," and sells them alongside other ornaments and items decorated with images of cities and monuments from around the world.
Hundreds of Twitter users have voiced outrage over the products, with some also including screenshots of other heart-shaped ornaments and keychains with pictures of the Nazi German death camp currently being sold on Amazon. Many said they had raised the issue with Amazon customer support. DW has also reached out to Amazon for comment and will update if they respond...
Read more: https://www.dw.com/en/amazon-under-fire-over-auschwitz-christmas-ornaments/a-51491204
- A Christmas ornament featuring Auschwitz is for sale on Amazon.
More, Times of Israel, https://www.timesofisrael.com/auschwitz-christmas-ornaments-up-for-sale-on-amazon/
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)dhol82
(9,353 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)FirstLight
(13,360 posts)Oh, that's horrible...why?
All i can think of is some fucking Neo-Nazis buying them up ...ew
jpak
(41,757 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)have a choice about what is sold through their website? Is there no review process, even by a single person with a high school education?
TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)hence the term "community standards"
They do have a huge list of unauthorized items though that their retailers can't sell.
But retailers cheat in listings, headings, and descriptions on Amazon, eBay etc.
It's a process
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)The headline doesn't even match the article's text, which makes it clear that it's an individual seller.
erronis
(15,241 posts)They are in business making profits off of everything they can.
They could carry posts promoting assassinating the current peeResident or blowing up the UN and they would not be held accountable.
What if FB had a few posts that said Zuck should be removed (however)? I bet these posts would be censored.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)paleotn
(17,912 posts)This is what we're dealing with, people.
PSPS
(13,594 posts)or screening facebook accounts or screening youtube posts and comments, etc.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)The source's headline is intentionally misleading and doesn't even match their own text.
We really shouldn't perpetuate a false narrative, regardless of the source or our preconceived notions.
Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)People will always try to slip things through and troll. Even here at DU they do it. Thankfully, MIRT works to keep such exposure to a minimum.
Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)Theyre like the Navy Seals of DU. They work in the background monitoring post, new users, etc, and will remove anyone that is obviously trolling or that the registration bot missed. They are regular members just like you. They could even be in this very thread.
Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)From the thousands of sellers. Id say if, once its pointed out about this, their response isnt holy crap! Thats out of here like YESTERDAY!, and try to defend it being there, then hold them accountable. But I say give them a chance to decide which horse they want to back, the seller, or human decency.
Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)Why shouldn't I blame Amazon? This shit would not have received the wide distribution that it did without Amazon.
GanjaGrower
(83 posts)Theres a difference. It is not humanly possible to vet every product sold by every seller on Amazon.
Algorithms and machine learning work to some degree as filters, but cant possibly be discerning enough to catch everything. In this case Amazon worked quickly to ban the seller as soon as they were made aware of the offensive products, dont see how you can blame anybody but the seller in this situation.
Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)I really don't understand why you excuse Amazon.
It is making money by allowing these entities to use its platform. It can do whatever is necessary to police its platform. No excuses.
GanjaGrower
(83 posts)Just pointing out the reality of the situation.
And I have to disagree with your statement that a store is a marketplace. A marketplace is a location/service that hosts multiple stores for a fee.
In my opinion Amazon did police its platform by banning the seller. There just really isn't a whole lot else they can do. There are 2 million sellers on Amazon, and somewhere around 350 million products. That number is growing by a rough average of one million per month. It is not humanly possible to preemptively vet every single new item that a seller makes available. That's why they rely on users like you and me to help them find things like this and bring it to their attention.
They also use screening programs, but they just aren't discerning enough to catch everything. Making these programs more "tough" risks blocking innocent new products that could be misconstrued as being offensive.
These aren't excuses, just the reality of the situation.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)They acted on the complaint. In fact, the mechanism for people to report issues like this is also part of the platform.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)How did you do it?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Credit companies do so with scale, product and client as a matter of course.
Ask them how they do it.
metalbot
(1,058 posts)Macy's clearly has control over what is bought and sold - they have procurement teams who specialize in this, and they have marketing teams who very carefully and specifically place products for sale.
Amazon's third party sellers are more similar to a flea market that charges people $100 to set up a table for the weekend. The flea market may have assorted policies (don't sell guns, drugs, or pornography), but that doesn't mean you'd expect the company running the flea market to inspect every box belonging to every vendor to ensure that nothing is in violation. When someone reports to you "hey, those guys are giving away a shot of whiskey for every Christmas ornament you buy", it's reasonable that the flea market would shut that vendor down, much like Amazon did here.
Polybius
(15,398 posts)Picture Amazon as the mall. Now picture Spencer selling Nazi ornaments. Once the mall finds out, they will put a stop to it, as Amazon did. But they are too big to check every single item for sale. That's why they rely on me and you, the people, to report improper items.
Retrograde
(10,136 posts)They allow pretty much anyone to set up a store with no human oversight, and trust that their algorithms will catch any shady merchandise - or that any questionable sellers or items will get enough bad publicity that they'll be forced to remove it. Meanwhile, Amazon collects its cut of every transaction.
keithbvadu2
(36,793 posts)Some deny the holocaust... Some openly brag about it.
KKK Conservative boasting:
We killed six million Jews the last time, he answered. Eleven million is nothing.
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/nation-world/national/article167939222.html
erronis
(15,241 posts)Unfortunately, one way they do this is to injure and kill people.
Remember Timothy McVeigh and his mission to get a white uprising? There are still perverts like him infesting the country/world.
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)Hekate
(90,674 posts)Amazon needs customers to be its watchdogs, along with watchdog groups. I'm glad the vendor was found out. There should be harsh penalties for sellers who pull this shit, because they know what they are oing.
Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts) and sells them alongside other ornaments and items decorated with images of cities and monuments from around the world.
If I had to guess, I would guess that these people run an imprinting and decal shop in an Asian country, and indiscrinately run off trinkets from what they know are substantial visitor destinations, and really have not much of an idea of the cultural and religious significance of the site.
If they were just running off souvenir trinkets of various tourist attractions - around which there is significant unease as applied to such sites - they may simply be entirely culturally ignorant, as we are to things held sacred in cultures we do not understand.
The class of inappropriate items inadvertently produced in Asia for sale in the west is a vast and sometimes disturbing category of goods.
The Yad Vashem gift shop is itself kind of a head scratcher....
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-shoah-souvenirs-should-the-yad-vashem-holocaust-museum-have-a-gift-store-1.6999353
Shoah Souvenirs: Should the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial Have a Gift Store?
area51
(11,908 posts)LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)murielm99
(30,736 posts)I know this is only one shop, but Amazon should refuse things like this. They should be able to use discretion about what is sold there.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Its not as if Amazon checks each item placed for sale by a vendor - or even has the staff it would require to do something like that.
Amazon was alerted to it and took it down.
Quackers
(2,256 posts)It wasnt even up long enough to generate a profile.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,185 posts)Doreen
(11,686 posts)but what is the name of the company/shop/people who are selling it.
If Amazon has the ability and/or right to not allow that on its site and they still allow it then they are at fault also.
It would be nice to know who is selling those so if they are selling acceptable things we do not buy them not knowing we are also supporting them.
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)gopiscrap
(23,758 posts)orleans
(34,051 posts)i feel like i could puke
cate94
(2,810 posts)Who came up with this lunacy?
wryter2000
(46,040 posts)Who on Earth thinks that image belongs on an ornament of any kind? Sick!
Quackers
(2,256 posts)People suck.
BigMin28
(1,176 posts)Amazon bears responsibility for what they allow to be sold on their site.
Takket
(21,564 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Not just a small minority, but a very large minority. Surely people can't be that ignorant? Is this the country that I'm living in? I guess so. Scary.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)Wuddles440
(1,123 posts)Just when you think you've heard or seen every type of despicable behavior imaginable. Beyond sickening!
icymist
(15,888 posts)To Hell with Amazon!
Quackers
(2,256 posts)The item wasnt even up long enough to generate a report on price tracking websites. Amazon removed it.
Response to Quackers (Reply #52)
Post removed
Quackers
(2,256 posts)Takket
(21,564 posts)Just as an FYI to people......... the Amazon Marketplace is a way for third party sellers to be able to use amazon's significant platform and search engine to sell things. Amazon sets out guidelines for what is and is not allowed in the marketplace. If Amazon finds you are violating their rules, they remove your item and if egregious enough they remove the seller. Which is exactly what happened here.
The marketplace has, according to this site, about 3 million active sellers
https://www.marketplacepulse.com/amazon/number-of-sellers
So there are literally tens of millions of items for sale on the marketplace. There is no screening every single items and so long as offensive/illegal items are removed once reported, no harm is done.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)And all the concentration camp ones have been removed.