Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,064 posts)
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 05:07 PM Dec 2019

Inman not guilty of lying to FBI; hung jury on bribery and extortion

Source: Detroit Free Press

A state lawmaker was found not guilty Tuesday of lying to the FBI in connection with a bribery and extortion investigation.

A jury in federal court in Grand Rapids could not reach a verdict on charges of attempted extortion and soliciting a bribe against state Rep. Larry Inman, a Republican who was expelled from his caucus after the charges were brought. U.S. District Court Chief Judge Robert Jonker declared a mistrial on those counts.

Inman, 65, of Williamsburg faced a possible prison term if convicted. It was not immediately clear whether federal prosecutors would retry him on the charges for which the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict.

The jury had deliberated for more than 10 hours over two days, following a trial that began last week.

Read more: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/12/10/larry-inman-not-guilty-lying-fbi-hung-jury-bribery/2629536001/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Inman not guilty of lying to FBI; hung jury on bribery and extortion (Original Post) alp227 Dec 2019 OP
Kickin' with disgust Faux pas Dec 2019 #1
Should have been a no-brainer SoCalNative Dec 2019 #2
So, when the prosecutor indicted Inman on his alleged bribery and Sloumeau Dec 2019 #3

Sloumeau

(2,657 posts)
3. So, when the prosecutor indicted Inman on his alleged bribery and
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 07:27 PM
Dec 2019

extortion, was that prosecutor trying to "overturn an election", or was he instead prosecuting someone because the prosecutor had evidence of a crime?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Inman not guilty of lying...