Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)
Fri Dec 13, 2019, 03:42 AM Dec 2019

US tests ground-launched ballistic missile that was previously banned

Source: Reuters


Idrees Ali, Reuters December 12, 2019 at 07:35 PM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon on Thursday tested a conventionally configured ground-launched ballistic missile, a test that would have been prohibited under the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

The United States formally withdrew from the landmark 1987 INF pact with Russia in August after determining that Moscow was violating the treaty, an accusation the Kremlin has denied.

It was the second test by the Pentagon that would have not been allowed under the INF treaty.

The treaty, negotiated by then-U.S. President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, banned land-based missiles with a range of between 310 and 3,400 miles (500 to 5,500 km).





Read more: https://taskandpurpose.com/ground-missile-inf

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US tests ground-launched ballistic missile that was previously banned (Original Post) Judi Lynn Dec 2019 OP
Another part of tRump legacy: renewed Arms Race. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2019 #1
Yup. And also: USA, the most dangerous nation on earth. KPN Dec 2019 #3
At least it might be a race. Igel Dec 2019 #4
Russia owns the US now, so why do we need an arms race? IronLionZion Dec 2019 #2

Igel

(35,300 posts)
4. At least it might be a race.
Fri Dec 13, 2019, 07:44 PM
Dec 2019

"I'll abide by the agreement. Even if Russian doesn't. And China was never in it."

The agreement didn't just limit weapons to counter Russia. If this were the case and both sides abided by the agreement, it was worth it and a great idea. But it limited weapons to counter China, not a member of the agreement, and under no commitment to limit anything.

Then there's the question of how much Russia was abiding by it and working just inside the limits (and in places past the limits).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US tests ground-launched ...