Tweets about Kobe Bryant get Washington Post reporter suspended for 'poor judgment' Read more here:
Source: Belleville News-Democrat
The Washington Post suspended a political reporter Sunday who tweeted about rape allegations against Kobe Bryant hours after the former basketball players death.
Bryant was accused of rape in 2003 by a 19-year-old employee at a Colorado hotel. The case was dropped and Bryant later admitted to cheating on his wife, Vanessa Bryant.
The tweets from Felicia Sonmez displayed poor judgment that undermined the work of her colleagues, the Washington Post said in a statement to Fox News.
The tweet led to Sonmez being ratiod and she later deleted the thread, which included her commenting about the amount of messages she received. She did not write the Daily Beast story she tweeted.
Read more: https://www.bnd.com/news/nation-world/national/article239675538.html
Just bad timing and no common sense.
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)young. Shell figure it out.
Fullduplexxx
(7,866 posts)delisen
(6,044 posts)When Bill Clinton's obituary is written it will mention an affair with a White House intern. I have no doubt that there will be reporters who tweet about it.
I am not a basketball "fan." I know Bryant was extremely talented and by all accounts was on a path in which he was doing much good. People are not saints.
There is really no good reason to suspend a political preorder for linking to a news article that was not an attack piece regarding an events that actually happened.
ripcord
(5,439 posts)And I will think just as badly about someone who brings it up within hours of his death, it isn't about the deceased it is about giving their family some time, would it have mattered at all if she had waited a day or two?
Jose Garcia
(2,598 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)with the smiling Kobe by the attorney's side. The poor girl was raped, and humiliated and then humiliated again in the media to the point where she decided not to cooperate with prosecution.
Poor timing? Late timing.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I also want to make it clear that I do not question the motives of this young woman. No money has been paid to this woman. She has agreed that this statement will not be used against me in the civil case. Although I truly believe this encounter between us was consensual, I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident the same way I did. After months of reviewing discovery, listening to her attorney, and even her testimony in person, I now understand how she feels that she did not consent to this encounter.
I issue this statement today fully aware that while one part of this case ends today, another remains. I understand that the civil case against me will go forward. That part of this case will be decided by and between the parties directly involved in the incident and will no longer be a financial or emotional drain on the citizens of the state of Colorado."
-Kobe Bryant
DrToast
(6,414 posts)I dont know what happened that night, but there was certainly reasonable doubt, IMO.
Yeehah
(4,588 posts)Because of all that doubt.
DrToast
(6,414 posts)And accepted a paycheck instead. You can spin that ridiculous argument the other way, you know.
obamanut2012
(26,083 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Can you imagine this now?
obamanut2012
(26,083 posts)There was a very strong case against him, but KB's attorneys and minions harassed and slut-shamed the victim fro over a year, including following her from job to job harassing her at her place of employment, leaking her medical records, etc. The DA and his staff begged her to not sop cooperating, but her mental health and life was in tatters. However, he had to admit what he did publicly, and agree to be sued civilly, for teh DA to drop teh suit, which he did. HE ADMITTED PUBLICLY IS WAS NOT CONSENSUAL.
But, you do you, and carry water for this rapist just because he was a sports star.
R B Garr
(16,955 posts)apart. She went to his room willingly when it was not in her job description to do so, like a bellhop or something. It was looking like she withdrew consent, so that is probably why Kobe agreed to apologize. I used to read about it extensively 17 years ago, but hadn't heard about her being harassed from job to job.
Speaking of leaks, Kobe's home address was leaked in court papers that were posted online. I remember seeing his address.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)in his public apology at the conclusion of the criminal charge. I posted the entire text of his apology a couple posts up-thread.
The civil case went on to monetary settlement, of unknown size.
R B Garr
(16,955 posts)male specimens. I forgot how many, but it wasn't just Kobe. Not only that, but she left her position to go to his room when there was no reason for her to be in his room based on her job position in the hotel.
It was coming down to a withdrawal of consent at some point during their encounter and there would have been testimony to that. So that looks to be why she settled for an apology from him -- plus about 2.5 million settlement, as I remember it.
unitedwethrive
(1,997 posts)I'm guessing that since charges were dropped, some agreement was reached. I would be interested in hearing the whole story.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)and didn't have a settlement attached at all.
I share your curiosity if the NDA is still in force.
R B Garr
(16,955 posts)the charges, but he had to apologize in court papers, as I recall. What came out was that she had DNA evidence of multiple men. So the whole story was getting a bit dicey. This is just from what I remember of the case 17 years ago. She went to his room, but her position in the hotel didn't warrant room visits like a bellhop or something.
I can see why she dropped the case. She had a chance to tell her story, but the other side would be having to explain some of the above circumstances. I think it was coming down to a retraction of consent, which is still a legitimate charge against him, but there were some things she had to explain that were out of the usual.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 28, 2020, 01:00 AM - Edit history (1)
That a reporter, who was herself a victim of sexual assault, wait a while to publish a story on him?
Why am I getting the feeling the answer is "no"?
Response to ripcord (Original post)
Jake Stern This message was self-deleted by its author.