NASA: Mars Curiosity rover finds rocky signs of once-gushing stream
Source: Los Angeles Times
NASAs Curiosity rover has found evidence of strong streams that once gushed across the Martian surface, mission scientists said Thursday.
Curiosity landed in Gale Crater on Aug. 5. But now, less than a couple of months into the Mars Science Laboratorys two-year mission, the Red Planet rover used its Mast Camera to examine rocks on its way to Glenelg Intrigue. Glenelg has caught scientists eyes because the odd spot serves as a junction between three different types of terrain.
The two outcrops in between, named Link and Hottah, have provided some exciting results in the meantime. The missions head scientist, Caltech geologist John Grotzinger, described the outcrop at Hottah as a raised cement section in a jackhammered urban sidewalk, possibly caused by an impact on the surface.
The telltale rocks are made of sandy rock riddled with large pebbles. The shape of those pebbles tells the scientists that the rocks must have traveled a long way, bumping into each other and smoothing out the rough edges. The relatively large size of many of those stones some the size of a golf ball tells them that water, not wind, must have carried them.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-mars-rover-gushing-water-stream-curiosity-20120927,0,1428281.story
heaven05
(18,124 posts)let's all go there. this one is done for anyway. We have another to 'conquer' and settle.
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)Over the last forty years since the last moon landing, if we'd spent as much money on science and space exploration as we spent on bullshit wars in the Middle East, we'd have colonies on at least one other world and be working out how to make it out of this solar system.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)you're entitled human. I base my judgement on precedent behavior of humans who have made a mess of the planet earth. You remember that planet don't you? It's the one where some people said global warming was a lie. Tell that to the polar bears, at least they can't talk back to someone like you. Tipping points are real. Every time I start my little 95' 300 thousand mile honda up I become ashamed at having to take part in the destruction of my planet, something I am sure you or the other one making fun of me never thought of. I don't care what you say about my original post. All, let me repeat, all we will do if we colonize mars or any other habitable planet is destroy it in the name of profit and so-called human technological progress. Take your misanthropic, misleading statement to the arctic and just sit there for a few weeks. I don't, I repeat, DON'T care what you say about my opinion.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)There's nothing there to destroy, and your entire argument is therefore pointless.
you missed my point which isn't hard for me to understand. have a good one.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)For better or for worse. The fact that we are even having this debate is an encouraging sign that humans are smart enough to, at least, start to contemplate their own potential for creation or destruction before we do it.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)refer to answer to prostatitis.
We've spent how many hundreds of millions of dollars for 'proof' that there 'may have been' water (maybe) in 'great' (or possibly not) quantities at one time in Mars' remote past (or possibly sooner or later).
This crap is the same thing every fucking time. It's long past time to send a team of real people out there.
Response to randome (Reply #2)
guyton This message was self-deleted by its author.
OnlinePoker
(5,719 posts)As long as the crew is volunteer and know there is the increased risk of cancer, I don't think you would have a hard time finding people to make the journey. Exploration has always carried a degree of risk and going to other planets will be no different.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)daleo
(21,317 posts)Though it may be possible to build a refuge that they could hide within, on a Mars bound spacecraft.
The journey would be no picnic.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)They have less time to live naturally, so less years of their lives would be lost to cancer.
Response to slackmaster (Reply #16)
guyton This message was self-deleted by its author.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Of course, we might not make it back. Ah well.
Response to OnlinePoker (Reply #9)
guyton This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Zapped enroute and zapped on the surface, because, IIRC, Mars does not have a magnetic field to protect lifeforms from the Sun's radiation.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)[img][/img]
Closeup view:
[img][/img]
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)The Hoffmans are risking it all to find the mother-lode on Mars. Jack Hoffman (the senior Hoffman) just knows their gold in that old Martian riverbed. He feels it in his blood. His son, Todd Hoffman scours the government auction sites in hope of picking an old spacecraft on the cheap. Todd's plan is risky, but if the Hoffman's strike pay-dirt, it will make them rich.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I can just imagine some private company bringing back a pathogen that wipes out all life on earth.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)It's amazing to be seeing photos of the terrain on another planet. I remember when sputnik was launched in 1957. I was nine years old. It could have happened a lot faster, but still, it's exciting to see these photos.
Rhiannon12866
(205,320 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)TrogL
(32,822 posts)Proof of intelligent life on Mars!!!!!
Hey, if it's good enough for the truthers, it's good enough for me.