Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 05:27 PM Jan 2012

European Leaders Use Debt Downgrades to Argue for Austerity, and for Stimulus

European leaders sought to limit damage from a ratings agency’s downgrade of nine countries on Friday, or even turn the news to their advantage, saying that it showed the need to impose more austerity or else do more to stimulate growth.

Germany’s chancellor, Angela Merkel, said Saturday that the downgrade by Standard & Poor’s meant the euro area must speed up measures to create a more centralized currency union.

“We are now challenged to implement the fiscal pact quickly,” Mrs. Merkel said in a statement Saturday, a day after S.& P. downgraded France, Austria and seven other countries — but not Germany. She added that leaders should not water down the agreement and instead quickly pass other measures they have agreed to, like limits on debt.

In Italy, Prime Minister Mario Monti used the downgrades to bolster his argument that austerity alone would not solve the euro crisis. Europe needs to support “national efforts in favor of growth and employment,” Mr. Monti told the newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore, according to Bloomberg News.

full: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/business/global/after-downgrades-european-leaders-argue-for-both-austerity-and-stimulus.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
European Leaders Use Debt Downgrades to Argue for Austerity, and for Stimulus (Original Post) alp227 Jan 2012 OP
good luck to them. xchrom Jan 2012 #1
The leaders are incompetent, hence they resort to austerity, they can't RKP5637 Jan 2012 #2
I can't say you're wrong. Nt xchrom Jan 2012 #3
Totally agree with response one and two. truedelphi Jan 2012 #4
Trillions were never in fact lent. Lucky Luciano Jan 2012 #7
Bernanke himself admitted to this "lending" of the monies on Sixty Minutes. truedelphi Jan 2012 #10
Sounds like an Artificial Crises fredamae Jan 2012 #5
I wonder itsrobert Jan 2012 #6
A person has to wonder why the grifters at S & P were lalowed to stay in truedelphi Jan 2012 #11
Shock and Awe that is going NO WHERE lovuian Jan 2012 #8
It's Complicated DallasNE Jan 2012 #9

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
1. good luck to them.
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 05:32 PM
Jan 2012

i'm skeptical this batch of leaders has what it takes.

other than austerity -- which will get every one more of what they already have.

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
2. The leaders are incompetent, hence they resort to austerity, they can't
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 05:41 PM
Jan 2012

lead out of a paper bag IMO. It's the ultimate cop out for incompetence, austerity.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
4. Totally agree with response one and two.
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 06:00 PM
Jan 2012

Regulate the damn bankers.

Then force the Federal Reserve to admit just which Global Bankers were "loaned" the damn nine to fourteen trillions of dollars that Paulson/Bernanke/Geithner offered up, and then force those Global Bankers to truly re-pay these loans.

With that fourteen trillions of dollars the US government could implement truly creative and tremendously beneficial "loans" to businesses that are small, that are committed to the growth of free(r) energies, and with people in so many nations then putting solar and wind devices on individual houses, we would see entire economies recover.

Instead, California was denied the twenty billions of dollars in loans the former governor Ahnold Schwartzenegger asked for, as Geithner claimed this would imperil the Federal Government's budget. I have ben asking this question for at least eighteen months - Nine trillions of dollars could run the entire state of California's budget for 133 years! If it isn't okay to loan a state some twenty billions of dollars, then how is it okay to loan out trillions to banks overseas?)



Lucky Luciano

(11,254 posts)
7. Trillions were never in fact lent.
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 08:32 PM
Jan 2012

There is a big difference between guaranteeing a bank's liabilities and actually transferring the cash. Also cash that was transferred was mostly for short term liquidity. It is quite a different animal from lending California $20B for the long term. Not saying California did not deserve the consideration, but you are makign a false comparison.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
10. Bernanke himself admitted to this "lending" of the monies on Sixty Minutes.
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 04:35 AM
Jan 2012

He said it was nothing that tax payers should worry about, as it was simply a transfer of "digital monies," into accounts that he digitally created at whatever banks he deemed needing and worthy of his consideration.

Oh and the bankers admit to the money being loaned and then state they have paid it back. Unfortunately the bankers used rather dubious volumes of investment books as collateral. If everything was so hunky dory, we wouldn't be seeing so much upset occurring in Europe even at the moment I type this.

But then the sad and sorry little secret that we were never told during the Autumn of 2008 when the Doctrine of Bailing out the cons, grifters and shady transactions people was that some half a quadrillion dollars resulted from the losses that were looming as a result of all the derivative/exotic investment losses.





itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
6. I wonder
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 07:07 PM
Jan 2012

Romney attacks Obama on so-called wanting to be like Europe.
By the end of the week S&P downgrades several Eurpean Counties.

Looks like they are manufacturing this.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
11. A person has to wonder why the grifters at S & P were lalowed to stay in
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 04:36 AM
Jan 2012

Business, given as how they were one of the rating agencies instrumental in setting up the world for these economic crises.

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
8. Shock and Awe that is going NO WHERE
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 09:02 PM
Jan 2012

It worked in Argentina And Brazil

but it isn't going to work in Europe

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
9. It's Complicated
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 11:03 PM
Jan 2012

Merkel is right regarding measures to create a more centrlized currency union because it would give the Euro central bank greater flexibility, i.e., qantatative easing. She is wrong to demand "limits" on debt, rather than targets.

Some belt tightening is probably available. It is just that those measures must be weighed against the impact those measures would have on growth and employment. Merkel seems to be losing sight of the fact that the problems facing Italy are both different and larger than those facing Germany and that imposing the wrong solution would do more harm than good. In other words, it's complicated.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»European Leaders Use Debt...