C.D.C. Didn't Write Testing Guidance Published on Its Website, Officials Say
Source: New York Times
A heavily criticized recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month about who should be tested for the coronavirus was not written by C.D.C. scientists and was posted to the agencys website despite their serious objections, according to several people familiar with the matter as well as internal documents obtained by The New York Times.
The guidance said it was not necessary to test people without symptoms of Covid-19 even if they had been exposed to the virus. It came at a time when public health experts were pushing for more testing rather than less, and administration officials told The Times that the document was a C.D.C. product and had been revised with input from the agencys director, Dr. Robert Redfield.
But officials told The Times this week that the health department did the rewriting itself and then dropped it into the C.D.C.s public website, flouting the agencys strict scientific review process.
That was a doc that came from the top down, from the H.H.S. and the task force, said a federal official with knowledge of the matter, referring to the White House task force on the coronavirus. That policy does not reflect what many people at the C.D.C. feel should be the policy.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/17/health/coronavirus-testing-cdc.html
Timewas
(2,193 posts)I do not believe anything that comes from any federal agency.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)msongs
(67,405 posts)a serious medical procedure
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,748 posts)It just didnt make sense not to test people who had been exposed to someone with the virus, yet was asymptomatic.
keithbvadu2
(36,797 posts)Acc to Donald, anyone who wants a test can get one.
But then, he lies.