Trump campaign jettisons major parts of its legal challenge against Pennsylvania's election results
Source: Washington Post
President Trumps campaign on Sunday scrapped a major part of its federal lawsuit challenging the election results in Pennsylvania. Trumps attorneys filed a revised version of the lawsuit, removing allegations that election officials violated the Trump campaigns constitutional rights by limiting the ability of their observers to watch votes being counted.
Trump and Rudolph W. Giuliani, his personal attorney, have said repeatedly that more than 600,000 votes in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh should be invalidated because of this issue. Trumps pared-down lawsuit now focuses on allegations that Republicans were illegally disadvantaged because some Democratic-leaning counties allowed voters to fix errors on their mail ballots. Counties have said this affected only a small number of votes.
Cliff Levine, an attorney representing the Democratic Party in the case, said on Sunday evening that Trumps move meant his lawsuit could not possibly change the result. Now youre only talking about a handful of ballots, said Levine. They would have absolutely no impact on the total count or on Joe Bidens win over Donald Trump. Kathy Boockvar, Pennsylvanias Democratic secretary of state, submitted a court filing in response to the Trump campaigns actions reiterating her request for the judge to dismiss the lawsuit.
The shift comes amid a string of losses in the Trump campaigns post-election legal effort, which claimed without evidence that voter fraud, irregularities and rule-breaking led to President-elect Joe Bidens victory. Taken together, the flurry of post-election litigation has affirmed the integrity of the election: many of the complaints have been tossed, and not a single vote has been invalidated.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-lawsuit-pennsylvania/2020/11/15/4aab8048-279b-11eb-9b14-ad872157ebc9_story.html
COL Mustard
(5,929 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,329 posts)Make your lies big, and cover them with bigger lies, and repeat them daily.
Better pay close attention and take notes. I think he'll be revealing methodology, techniques, and magnitude.
Cha
(297,733 posts)Cliff Levine, an attorney representing t"he Democratic Party in the case, said on Sunday evening that Trumps move meant his lawsuit could not possibly change the result."
BumRushDaShow
(129,569 posts)Cha
(297,733 posts)And I know she was not alone!!!
Cha
(297,733 posts)I posted it on my FB today.. to show my family how much I related to the 86 year old Grandma in PA.
Aussie105
(5,437 posts)It was a game of bluff.
And the judges aren't playing the game. 'Put up or shut up' is a common response.
ancianita
(36,137 posts)vote count process -- which you live streamed here, as well, thanks very much -- that the public and courts could not possibly give credence to Trump's legal team.
BumRushDaShow
(129,569 posts)They have been processing small batches of provisional ballots and loading the results at some point both for the local election tally and for the state.
The stream continues to run 24/7. The vast majority of the ballots are done but they are still working sporadically on batches of provisionals and any mail-ins that had been set aside for some issue, plus they were tallying the military/overseas ballots that had to be in by November 12, so they were coming in after November 3rd..
ancianita
(36,137 posts)It's interesting that news reports of the court goings-on don't mention this, don't you think?
It's the pressure of the PA public's witness that is the undoing of the bs fights by the scoundrel side of election politics. The more light on the truth of things, the more they walk out.
At some point they'll have to stop believing their own hype and admit to their politics of spite.
BumRushDaShow
(129,569 posts)I have seen some of the "observers" there monitoring what is going on. In fact, a couple days ago, the elections staff set up a couple of tables with monitors for them to look at/use and although I'm not sure what they were viewing, I expect they may have been screen-sharing with some of the workers who were actually reviewing info within the state's data system and/or were displaying a camera closeup view of the ballots as they were being handled to check for signatures, etc., on the outer envelopes.
Took a few screenshots of that -
ancianita
(36,137 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,569 posts)the rest of the world has pretty much moved on with the assumption that Biden's election is a done deal and this other crap is just ratings fodder for them. IMHO, they need to start ignoring the tweets and the noise and move on to other things that need to be discussed like a re-up of the CARES funding and some kind of new C.R. for the federal government, because if nothing is passed by December 11, the federal government will shut down.
ancianita
(36,137 posts)The fact that the rest of the country has moved on still doesn't mean that media shouldn't care to report that these kinds of records are important for the public record. Not take up any news cycles, simply be come kind of acknowledgement report in the NYT, for instance.
Obviously, Senate Republican obstruction of public help is the disgrace of the nation. And them.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)If not the actual law regarding errors on mail in ballots. The practice has always been to declare those as provisional ballots and then notify the voter they have until X to come in and correct the error in order for the ballot to be counted.
Now I can't say one way or the other on whether some of the voter suppression law changes caused those ballots to now be rejected. That would be unfortunate. The idea is to qualify as many ballots as possible. Often it is a signatures don't match issue. An example, Rose M. Johnson gets married and changes her name to Rose M. Miller. State law requires the voter to use maiden name for middle name so the voter signs it Rose J. Miller rather than Rose M. Miller. Used to have to deal with that all of the time.
BumRushDaShow
(129,569 posts)and the acknowledgement by the campaign that none of their "observers" had actually had any "elections training" so they were completely clueless and were flagging things that were handled appropriately in the normal/standard way by elections workers nationwide, yet were declared "fraud" by a bunch of incompetents.
One of the things they had jumped up and down about was that some people did not fill out their address under their signature in the voter declaration section on the back of the outer envelope. However literally diagonally across from that section is another section with the voter's name and address, pre-printed on the envelope, AND that pre-printed info included both a barcode AND QR code to associate the ballot to a real voter so that the submission of the vote could be registered and would flag someone if they tried to vote again by a different method. The judge basically laughed them out of the courtroom.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Big cases attacking the constitutionality of the 2020 election
ancianita
(36,137 posts)As if he couldn't possibly have any any clue what DeJoy and the rest were up to!
Cha
(297,733 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,403 posts)Remember when his investigators were finding "unbelievable" things in Hawaii? Remember when Melanoma was going to address the fact that violated immigration law? He's always threatening to sue and always "unbelievable" evidence. He's a liar.
And this "kraken?" No serious lawyer says "release the Kraken." If they add actual damning evidence, this would already be in court, and they would release it. It's theater for the rubes to keep the money flowing in.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Bye Don.....