Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,613 posts)
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 10:18 AM Nov 2020

Law banning abortion method takes effect in Nebraska without legal challenge

Source: Omaha World Herald

By Martha Stoddard

LINCOLN — A new law banning one type of second-trimester abortion took effect in Nebraska last week, but one major abortion provider said it will not change what he does.

Dr. LeRoy Carhart, medical director of the Clinics for Abortion and Reproductive Excellence in Bellevue and Bethesda, Maryland, said he does not use the procedure prohibited under Legislative Bill 814.

“It’s going to make no difference in what we offer to the populace,” he said. “We will be able to provide the same quality and level of services we have for many years.”

The new law, introduced by State Sen. Suzanne Geist of Lincoln, prohibits an abortion method called dilation and evacuation. The procedure involves dilating a woman’s cervix and removing the fetus in pieces. Abortion opponents call the procedure dismemberment abortion.


Read more: https://omaha.com/news/state-and-regional/law-banning-abortion-method-takes-effect-in-nebraska-without-legal-challenge/article_c5a476f4-0a3d-5491-9798-6ccc37fda81b.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Law banning abortion method takes effect in Nebraska without legal challenge (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2020 OP
And the War On Women continues apace. niyad Nov 2020 #1
That the measure J_William_Ryan Nov 2020 #2
This procedure is used often to remove dead fetuses Greybnk48 Nov 2020 #3
Why adopt the Anit-Women's Rights language? NotANeocon Nov 2020 #4
Yes, let's get down to the basics and call a spade a spade. rgbecker Nov 2020 #5

J_William_Ryan

(1,753 posts)
2. That the measure
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 12:12 PM
Nov 2020

won’t change how the clinic functions is proof that it was enacted in bad faith, having nothing to do with protecting the health of women.

Greybnk48

(10,167 posts)
3. This procedure is used often to remove dead fetuses
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 12:20 PM
Nov 2020

that are beginning to rot inside the mother, to avoid sepsis. It's a bit safer than a dilatation and curettage. We used to perform these at a Catholic hospital where I worked!

These people are crazy. I suspect the docs will just keep doing it anyway. It's safer for mom.

NotANeocon

(423 posts)
4. Why adopt the Anit-Women's Rights language?
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 04:27 PM
Nov 2020

If there has been no birth then the WOMAN is not a "mom". "unborn baby" is an oxymoron but the morons have created it because "fetus" does not suit their purpose.

Language hi-jack advances propaganda.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Law banning abortion meth...