N. Carolina ban on Down syndrome abortions goes to governor
Source: AP
By BRYAN ANDERSON
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) North Carolina senators approved a bill on Thursday to bar women from getting abortions on the basis of race, sex or a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.
With the Senates party-line vote, the prohibition Republicans are seeking now heads to Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper, who is likely to veto it, having rejected previous anti-abortion restrictions.
Abortion rights groups say the GOP-led bill, which was universally opposed by Senate Democrats and supported by only six Democratic House lawmakers, would prevent women from having open conversations with their doctors and deny their constitutional right to an abortion.
Abortions on the basis of sex selection are already prohibited in North Carolina. House Bill 453, approved in the Senate by a vote of 27-20, would expand and strengthen the existing law by requiring physicians to report, with a signed confirmation, that an abortion was not desired due to sex, race or the likelihood of being born with Down syndrome.
FILE - In this May 27, 2021 file photo, North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper speaks to the gathered media after his tour of a COVID-19 vaccine clinic at the Pine Hall Brick plant in Madison, N.C. North Carolina's Senate approved a measure on Thursday, June 10, to prohibit doctors from performing abortions if a woman is seeking it because of race, sex or a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. (Woody Marshall/News & Record via AP, File)
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/down-syndrome-abortion-race-and-ethnicity-racial-injustice-business-50af6b46b435686a440ae71f0cfb7c2c
GB_RN
(2,373 posts)By the party of "Less big gummint." Go figure. 🙄
I hate the assholes who run our state lege.
steventh
(2,143 posts)Without him things would be very different around here.
Same goes for AG Josh Stein (D) and Democrats in the legislature. There are just not enough of them. Obviously.
area51
(11,920 posts)are they planning on the state paying for the raising of Down's syndrome children?
More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)I'm guessing: none.
Warpy
(111,339 posts)ignorant bible beaters make absolutely rotten politicians. Down's doesn't just make a kid a slow learner, it can comewith catastrophic health issues and we still have no rational health care system, no support for working women, no real system in place for when these kids grow up, and abysmally low wages. That adds up to overstressed families and a lot of kids who could lead productive lives with help who fall through chasms, not cracks.
Those bible beating assholes need to fix those problems first. Then we'll talk about the ethics of aborting a healthy pregnancy when the fetus has Down's. It's still not their choice, though. We'll just talk about it.
LudwigPastorius
(9,170 posts)you assholes.
Luciferous
(6,085 posts)forced to raise them.
Red Mountain
(1,737 posts)It's not just an economic decision but if they were serious about ending selective abortion in this case you would think they MIGHT consider making it easier for a parent without means to raise a downs kid.
The Lord will not provide.
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,830 posts)Americas taliban.
JCMach1
(27,572 posts)Hateful, hateful legislation
demigoddess
(6,644 posts)a genetic anomaly and have been accosted on the street in some states. Also a friend had a son with Down's and he died at the age of 21.From a heart defect. Down's doesn't just affect the brain. Like many other syndromes. My daughter has several physical problems in addition to mental retardation.
Bayard
(22,149 posts)Love the fetus, hate the child.
Politicians shouldn't be making decisions on a women's right to abortion at all, much less for a woman who feels she can not take care of a disabled child.