George W. Bush calls withdrawal of U.S. and other NATO troops from Afghanistan "a mistake"
Source: CBS News
Former President George W. Bush on Wednesday criticized the withdrawal of NATO troops from Afghanistan and said civilians were being left to be "slaughtered" by the Taliban.
"I think the consequences are going to be unbelievably bad," he told German broadcaster Deutsche Welle.
"Afghan women and girls are going to suffer unspeakable harm. This is a mistake. ... They're just going to be left behind to be slaughtered by these very brutal people, and it breaks my heart," Mr. Bush said.
The former Republican president, who sent troops to Afghanistan in the autumn of 2001 after the September 11 attacks, said he believed German Chancellor Angela Merkel "feels the same way."
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/george-w-bush-withdrawal-of-us-nato-troops-afghanistan-mistake/
mrsv
(209 posts)STFU!!!! This man is responsible for thousands of deaths. Fucking mission completed.
He needs to stick with his painting and stay out of this.
He got us into this mess, along with Rumsfeld.
SOBs.
Polybius
(15,390 posts)Several hundred thousand at least.
DinahMoeHum
(21,784 posts)You got us into this mess to begin with.
Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)The Afghani people - and especially the women and children - deserve better. Most don't know about Bush-Cheney, they need help and protection NOW.
marie999
(3,334 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)If we can't fix it after 20 years we never will.
Warpy
(111,254 posts)but what Dubya doesn't seem to realize is that 20 years of being a referee between warring tribes is 10 years too long. Once bin Laden was out of the way, we should have begun to withdraw, but neither Obama nor Dumdum wanted to be blamed for the mess that would ensue, and it will. We were only stalling the inevitable.
Afghanistan is deeply tribal and extremely religious. It will take some time for them to find a new equilibrium. We can't do it for them.
So brace yourselves, kiddies, to be blamed for every Taliban crazy coming out of the woodwork, every battle, and every death. We know that's going to happen.
Mysterian
(4,587 posts)Bush and his criminal cabal lied to justify an invasion of Iraq, a country that was not a threat to the USA.
A majority of Democrats in Congress voted against the criminal Iraq war. Those who voted for it should be shamed.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)Submariner
(12,503 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 14, 2021, 09:33 AM - Edit history (1)
on Dec 12, 2000 was the "mistake".
If he was an honorable person he would have slashed his wrists and bled out in his bath tub a decade ago, or sooner. Total pond scum POS who should not be allowed to freely come out in public. I hope when he visits restaurants, the staff spits on his food.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)I think you could argue that GWB's crimes were even worse than Trump. Trump broke numerous laws and he needs to pay, but at least he did not get us in an illegal war.
Botany
(70,501 posts)But Rummy gave a stand down order to let him get away because if we had killed him w & Cheney would
not have had a reason to start their Iraqi war. We could have killed bin Laden, ousted the Taliban, and
walked away but instead we got bogged down into an endless unwinnable nightmare where we could win all
the battles but never win the occupation.
'Breaks my heart': Former President Bush says Afghanistan troop withdrawal is a mistake
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/breaks-my-heart-former-president-bush-says-afghanistan-troop-withdrawal-n1273904
mac2766
(658 posts)Bin Laden and the Taliban needed to be taken care of. I believe it could have happened fairly rapidly if the oil barons hadn't been in control of the military at the time.
I said it then, and I'll say it again, the war in Iraq was unnecessary and should never have happened.
Botany
(70,501 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)Cheney should have looked at the shale oil and fracking options here in the US. That actually did lower global oil prices during the Obama years to make the US the biggest oil producer.
Botany
(70,501 posts)For the first 6 to 9 months after we invaded Iraq they pumped the hell out of those
Iraqi oil fields and all that oil was not metered (measured) so basically it was stolen.
BTW Dick Cheney's portfolio aka Halliburton went up something like 2,900% in one quarter
after we invaded Iraq. Halliburton was billing the US government for their work cost plus
on no bid contracts. God only knows how much was stolen and or grifted in these scams.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)And of course, falsely accusing others of what they themselves do.
Blue_playwright
(1,568 posts)He's right about the consequences. I just don't know how we can do it differently - I mean, we've been there for 20 damn years, we cannot prop up the government for 20 more.
But I am upset with both Trump and Biden for not having a plan to get our allies in the country out prior to the withdrawal. I think it's unforgivable.
PatSeg
(47,418 posts)but he is responsible for putting successive presidents in such an impossible position. George wanted to play soldier and outdo his daddy, so we ended up with twenty years of dire consequences. We can't stay there forever, something he should of thought of before he put boots on the ground in another country. As they say, you don't go in if you don't know how you'll get out.
He should have focused on his painting and kept his foreign policy opinions to himself. Why on earth would anyone care what he thinks? A lot of people were starting to forget what an incompetent disaster of a president he was and he had to go and remind them.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,583 posts)The French and British have had their translators and families out for months, and last week Biden promised in no uncertain terms to get them out post haste. So why are they still there, and no move has been made to get them out of the country?
It turns out that some yahoos in the State Department and Homeland Security have gummed it up, because once the translators are on U.S. soil (Guarm's governor says they're waiting with open arms) they would "have the same rights as Americans." These guys should be put on a plane and dropped off in Afghanistan with orders to stay there until the last translator leaves. They'd have everyone out of Afghanistan by the end of the week!
The entire Congress -- Dems andQRepugs alike -- should be pressuring Biden to get this done NOW. If even one translator is killed by the Taliban it will be an example to the world that our country's promises aren't worth a damn. "Watch what they do, not what they say," is the world's watchword.
PatSeg
(47,418 posts)Someone(s) needs to be held accountable for such a major screwup. This is something I would have expected from the Trump administration.
Rebl2
(13,497 posts)what you say is correct. I wish we could have taken the translators out with our troops. I also fear for the women there.
jaxexpat
(6,820 posts)Of course, going full Rambo with the CIA from the get-go probably didn't win many hearts and minds. I remember stories of con-ex containers full of dead men and boys, victims of tribal warfare waged with help from their new friends. Some rumors about the complexity of conducting peace in the face of feudal poppy field warlords.
People must understand that nothing good is ever built by weapons. It's just common sense. Even to try is sin.
Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)Don't let the hatred of Bush stop us from helping the Afghan people.
inwiththenew
(972 posts)Unfortunately some good people who stuck their neck out for us are probably going to have it cut. Sad all around.
Don't get me wrong, it was time to go but it could have been handled better. We had years to plan the exit.
chowder66
(9,067 posts)July 14, 2021|Updated today at 12:14 p.m. EDT
snip....
The United States will begin flights later this month to evacuate interpreters and other Afghan nationals who assisted the American war effort, a senior administration official said Wednesday.
The announcement comes with an Aug. 31 deadline looming for completion of the U.S. militarys withdrawal from Afghanistan after 20 years of war.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/us-afghanistan-interpreters/2021/07/14/fb1d5fae-e4b6-11eb-a41e-c8442c213fa8_story.html
SamKnause
(13,101 posts)You should have to repay the trillions of dollars wasted by your warmongering administration.
You should be in prison.
IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)he didn't waste so many human lives and resources to invade Iraq.
Lemon Lyman
(1,349 posts)Go paint your labradoodle and shat up.
johnthewoodworker
(694 posts)Lonestarblue
(9,981 posts)Russia failed to change Afghanistan, just as the US failed. We have propped up the Afghan government for 20 years. Its time to get out, though I wish the government was doing more to protect those who assisted the military by getting them out of the country.
The Taliban will most likely take over the country and install strict Islamic laws that especially hurt women and girls. We can only hope that the short taste of freedoms they have experienced for the past few years encourages them and the males in their families to continue fighting for their rights.
BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)mostly because of the strategic locations of trade routes and access points within the country. For example - https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/first-afghan-war
Outside of complete genocide of the Taliban (and even that would most likely result in a future generation's revenge campaign), involvement there is unwinnable.
heckles65
(549 posts)instead of being distracted by Iraq. I said so at the time.
twodogsbarking
(9,739 posts)eh George.
BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)Yet 18 years ago, he stood on the deck of an aircraft carrier and declared -
onetexan
(13,037 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)do that, at least to anyone that was paying attention from 2001 and after. But thats reason # 900 why the trump presidency was a bad thing. GWB looks better by comparison to that orange bastard. But he was still an awful person, and a war criminal.
FalloutShelter
(11,857 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,628 posts)The Taliban is extremely strict and brutal. That's how they maintain religious rule, but what are we supposed to do about it? 20 years hasn't persuaded them, nor has it weakened their ideology.
We can't hold the people of Afghanistan's hand forever. If and when they want change, it will happen. Until then, well, what he said.
twodogsbarking
(9,739 posts)There is no happy ending.
LittleGirl
(8,285 posts)NH Ethylene
(30,810 posts)I definitely want us out of there, but it is so sad that the women will suffer. On the other hand, people are suffering from harsh regimes all over the world and the US feels no obligation to intercede.
Really, there is no way that Bush should be commenting on this.
keithbvadu2
(36,785 posts)Dubya... What is your answer other than killing more of our troops?
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)Ford_Prefect
(7,895 posts)existed at the time of the invasion. Among other critical points made was that it would take a minimum of 10 years, it would mean destroying and recreating the Afghan economy along with much of its infrastructure, and its culture. It would involve creating what would be seen as a 51st US state by our allies and enemies alike, and it would mean we would of necessity need to overthrow and replace the government of Pakistan along with numerous corrupt officials and their families.
All of these steps meant we would automatically become the new empire to be resisted. A situation ultimately doomed to failure by the cultures of the region along with the behavior and intervention of Saudi, Russian, Chinese, and "other" interested parties.
The same sources argued that there was a probable limit to what could be accomplished due to the hold the local warlords had over the culture and economy of Afghanistan.
As sad a thing as it is to leave people facing the retribution and violent oppression the Taliban will deliver, we never had the ability to prevent it as long as Pakistan and the Saudis supported and assisted them. I do not defend the choices made at any point. It was always a war we could not win and peace we could not guarantee.
I hold the opinion that Cheney, GOP Neo-cons and others in our government with an interest in owning critical oil and pipeline resources of the region used this situation to expand the mission beyond destroying Bin Laden and his local allies, if indeed that was the actual goal.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts).... decides to start a war in a foreign country. THEIR SONS AND DAUGHTERS must be drafted into the military and spend at least one tour in a combat zone.
I know that will never happen but if it did we would have far fewer unnecessary wars.
As to Afghanistan, the Russian couldn't defeat them with clear supply lines, adequate troops, and superior weapons. That should have told us all we need to know.
But add to that the knowledge we should have gained in Vietnam that it isn't possible to win against indigenous populations fighting their type of war on familiar ground.
Ford_Prefect
(7,895 posts)The doubt was that any lasting peace could be built on what remained. As with Vietnam and previous wars ln Afghanistan the goal of ending what was a civil war between factions within one country who were supported and financed by outside interests was dubious and impractical. Consider the results in Iraq as another example.
Another problem was how much of the economy and political interaction was determined by the warlords and the Opium trade they run.
And then there was the diffuse and broadly organized al-Qaeda. Which was specifically built to be hard to find and existing across several borders at once.
The Hubris of the Neo-Cons was that we were the mighty USA and could defeat less complex societies and less powerful armies. They were wrong before a single boot touched ground in Kabul or Kandahar. We had the power to destroy infrastructure and facilities, to disrupt a formal economy, and kill many people. Power doesn't build a community or a country and it cannot eliminate a well financed group which has no single, physical base.
LT Barclay
(2,596 posts)I don't think we ever should have been there. It was a military solution to what was a criminal and intelligence problem. But once it was done, to me, the only solution would have been to offer refuge to those that didn't want to live under Taliban rule, and offer "asylum" in other countries including those in the middle east and the west.
Ford_Prefect
(7,895 posts)The we obliged them to help us on the trust that they would be given fair treatment. Their situation certainly requires an appropriate resolution. Pragmatically it may prove difficult to accomplish since there seems to have been little prior planning.
On balance the question arises what to do about all the other Afghan citizens who stand at risk from the Taliban? I would have to say that we put them there to some degree. As with Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam citizens were left in harm's way when the US Army, CIA and State Department concluded operations and left.
Solly Mack
(90,763 posts)and more time on actually ridding Afghanistan of the Taliban?
Maybe? Just maybe?
maddogesq
(1,245 posts)Had he not gone along with the PNAC bunch by diverting resources to that Iraq debacle, we might not have wasted 20 years in Afghanistan. Instead, he was a tool of Cheney and that slimy bunch over at Carlyle.
Sure, there are consequences when theres a void left after 20 years, but wtf other choice do we have? Its the same crap as Nam and Iraq: drawn-out quagmires that only benefit the MIC.
Anything W says is irrelevant to today.
Think of the resources wed have for infrastructure, healthcare, etc. that wed have had we not gotten into these fuckup up drawn out wars over the past 60 years. It boggles the mind
SouthBayDem
(32,019 posts)I'm guessing David Rubenstein: https://www.democracynow.org/2003/7/3/democracy_now_exclusive_why_the_carlyle
maddogesq
(1,245 posts).
LaMouffette
(2,030 posts)Didn't hear a peep out of Shrub when that happened!
Actually, I don't know if he objected to the Syria withdrawal or not, and no time to google it, but I seriously doubt that he raised any objection.
raccoon
(31,110 posts)seta1950
(932 posts)The mistake was starting the war, the price those soldiers pay is too steep , a war started on a lie.
BlueMTexpat
(15,368 posts)in the first place!
Stuart G
(38,420 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 14, 2021, 12:53 PM - Edit history (2)
...Bush Jr. has stayed out of politics and kept his mouth shut. But someone very high up urged him to come out
and criticize Biden. By opening his mouth for the..."Good Of The Party" he proves he is a .."Team Member." They even
told him what to say:
..........."Afghan women and girls are going to suffer unspeakable harm..This is a mistake"........................
Bush Jr. doesn't give a s**t about anyone but himself, but if they ask him to do some good for the ..."Good Of The
Party." well he can do it, if it is easy...and making a statement is ....very easy!!!...The last thing this ...clown...
(apologies to all clowns) wants to do is get involved..But one statement .. For The.Good Of The Party.......
is not too difficult, especially if he makes no more statements.....But we will see if Jr. is going to get deeply involved.
If he does he will have to defend himself and his actions. My guess this is a one time statement. Then back to
his outstanding art work...whatever that is... ....
KPN
(15,643 posts)Leaving is essentially an admission by the US government that staying beyond the initial mission was a mistake. So of course he would say that since this will cement in the history books that his decision to stay in Afghanistan was a major policy mistake.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)I gather by GWB's logic that it's perfectly OK to launch endless wars having non-achievable missions, as long as we never actually withdraw from them.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)the Terror Dream. It describes how saving women was used as a pretext for invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. It was all bullshit, designed to manipulate peoples emotions.
For the first Iraq war, a PR firm, Hill & Knowlton, promulgated the lie that Saddam Husseins soldiers were ripping babies from incubators and bashing them on the floor. This was complete fabrication.
If republicans really gave a damn about women and girls, they would pass legislation to make their lives better by providing a safety net that guarantees reproductive freedom.
If America were serious about liberating Afghan women, we would need to take a radical step of extricating all women and girls from Afghanistan, wall it in, and watch as the taliban dies off.
pfitz59
(10,376 posts)not spouting BS
suegeo
(2,573 posts)George W. Asshole rubbed the shoulders of Merkel during a meeting. She cringed/tried to throw him off. Unwanted contact with the war criminal who stole the elections in 2000 and 2004
Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)countries that didn't attack us. 17 of 19 were Saudis, but your family was too in bed with the Royal family and Bin Ladens weren't they? Keep painting.
orwell
(7,771 posts)...Mission Accomplished!
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I feel sorry for the Afghani females especially.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)including getting us in an illegal war on false pretenses. But leaving Afghanistan is no mistake. There is no military solution there.
marble falls
(57,080 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)czarjak
(11,269 posts)Justice matters.
(6,928 posts)The Life and Crimes of George Herbert Walker Bush (w/ Lamar Waldron)
The Holocaust and the Bush family fortune
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/12/05/intr-d05.html
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Skittles
(153,150 posts)GO FUCK YOURSELF DUBYA