Judge starts Rittenhouse trial with trivia and lectures
Source: Yahoo News
MADISON, Wis. (AP) The judge presiding over Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial opened jury selection Monday with a round of Jeopardy!-like trivia, assured potential jurors he doesn't have COVID-19 and reached back to the fall of the Roman Empire to emphasize the gravity of their duty.
Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder drew laughs in the courtroom and some cringes on social media as he peppered potential jurors with trivia questions, and offered commentary on some. When the answer to one was the movie Psycho, the 75-year-old Schroeder quipped: Heard of it.
One potential juror told Schroeder he had nasal surgery scheduled in 10 days. The judge asked him, What would you rather do, be here with me or have your nose operated on? The man responded: Ill be honest with you, Im not looking forward to it. The judge laughed and said he would take it under consideration.
The tenor of Monday's hearing was no surprise to one attorney who has appeared before Schroeder.
Michael Cicchini, a Kenosha-based defense attorney, said the beginning of jury selection can be "a logistical nightmare. Attorneys are handed seating charts and other paperwork as jurors are led in, and they need time to get organized. Schroeder traditionally spends that time playing trivia with the jury pool until the attorneys are ready, he said.
Read more: https://news.yahoo.com/judge-starts-rittenhouse-trial-trivia-171749242.html
msongs
(67,405 posts)Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)So wouldnt make a big deal of the way a judge does jury selection when theres been no complaints by lawyers for decades.
Traildogbob
(8,739 posts)Rickies daddy? Wonder if he will allow the victim without an arm come testify. Oh, sorry, not a victim, the one armed rioter.
Orrex
(63,210 posts)Poor Kyle. What else could he do but illegally transport a firearm across state lines with the intent to murder someone?
Igel
(35,307 posts)He's giving cover to the lawyers involved to get their act together.
Better to pressure the prosecutor and defense and trigger a verdict of mistrial if it goes against the defendant. I guess.
The rest is Mulderism.
And just for good measure,
I kdy tady piva neni, jenom borovicka. Ahoj!
BamaRefugee
(3,483 posts)jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)Statler or Waldorf?
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,231 posts)SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)This judge should retire....yesterday.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)Many judges do not allow them to be referred to as victims because there hasn't been a verdict against the defendant and it could prejudice a jury
What many have found odd is his allowing the defense to use rioter and looter, though he has said the defense has to show this to be true