In race to provide internet from space, companies ask FCC for about 38,000 new broadband satellites
Source: CNBC
A flurry of space companies filed requests with the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday for new or expanded broadband networks, asking the regulator for approval of nearly 38,000 total satellites.
Amazon, Astra, Boeing, Inmarsat, Intelsat, Hughes Network, OneWeb, SpinLaunch, and Telesat are among those asking the FCC for access to what is known as V-band spectrum, a range of frequency that the companies hope to use to provide global broadband service from space.
The FCC's deadline for its latest processing round of proposals to use V-band was Thursday at midnight, driving the influx of applications.
"It's just a land grab," Quilty Analytics founder Chris Quilty told CNBC. Quilty's boutique research and investment firm focused on the satellite communications sector.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/in-race-to-provide-internet-from-space-companies-ask-fcc-for-about-38000-new-broadband-satellites/ar-AAQmGsS?li=BBnb7Kz
Zorro
(15,740 posts)Oxygen absorption is an issue.
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)TomWilm
(1,832 posts)OneCrazyDiamond
(2,032 posts)It's wireless.
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)LastDemocratInSC
(3,647 posts)A few collisions among all those satellites, whether accidental or not, could cause a cascading collision event that could affect our ability to get anything beyond LEO.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)It will allow high speed internet to rural areas.
SWBTATTReg
(22,144 posts)these are just the USA ones...what about other countries and their satellites? Going to have to expand the range of communications to allow satellites to park themselves further out in space so as to not congest the space lanes. Shoot, one day will we be even able to launch a manned mission to space (e.g., Mars, etc.) w/o there being untold danger of collisions, etc.?
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)starlink garbage Elon Musk put out there already. Every time I try to look at the night sky, I see that shit... totally ruins being in the wilderness.
SWBTATTReg
(22,144 posts)What are the powers that be going to do? Eventually I suspect that they'll have to ration or auction off to the highest bidder slots in space? And I thought that space was literally free to all, but I suspect that it's going to go to the highest bidder/or the one w/ the biggest pockets and thus, actually try and monopolize space...and I thought space was the last frontier...
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)maybe we should check into low orbit houseing , no tax's because no gov. own's anything ! no bad weather , just get killed by space junk ? just a theory ?
There's an FCC should hear about all this catering to a 'dishy' market while they refuse to expand land based broadband to 80 million Americans.
I hear you about the night sky; worse, Elon's got plans to get up to 30,000 into orbit.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)ancianita
(36,109 posts)But without an atmosphere -- which doesn't exist anywhere close by Earth -- there is absolutely no avoiding all the cosmic debris, which is worse than our orbital garbage. Elon's SpaceX is to make money, not explore space.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Until you consider there are nearly a billion and a half cars right here on Planet Earth. I'm not saying it's benign, but it's not apocalyptical, either.
keithbvadu2
(36,829 posts)Hekate
(90,721 posts)Javaman
(62,531 posts)The Kessler syndrome (also called the Kessler effect,[1][2] collisional cascading, or ablation cascade), proposed by NASA scientist Donald J. Kessler in 1978, is a scenario in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) due to space pollution is high enough that collisions between objects could cause a cascade in which each collision generates space debris that increases the likelihood of further collisions.[3] In 2009 Kessler wrote that modeling results had concluded that the debris environment was already unstable, "such that any attempt to achieve a growth-free small debris environment by eliminating sources of past debris will likely fail because fragments from future collisions will be generated faster than atmospheric drag will remove them".[4] One implication is that the distribution of debris in orbit could render space activities and the use of satellites in specific orbital ranges difficult for many generations.[3]
canetoad
(17,169 posts)Now all the extra terrestrials can read our social media.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Think there will be competition? Not a chance,just like now.
LiberalFighter
(50,956 posts)Marcuse
(7,490 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,956 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,271 posts)stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)If the FCC permits these applications, they should charge these companies millions for each satellite and have very strict regulations. Don't make the same stupid mistakes of giving away
what belongs to the US taxpayers that they did with bigOil, bigPharma and bigNet.