Warrant issued for Alec Baldwin's cellphone after shooting on 'Rust' set
Source: NBC News
A search warrant was issued for actor Alec Baldwin's cellphone Thursday, nearly two months after a shooting on the New Mexico set of "Rust" killed the film's cinematographer and injured its director, court documents show.
In an affidavit filed in Santa Fe Magistrate Court, authorities asked for the iPhone "due to conversations between affiant and Alec Baldwin being conducted through 'iMessages.'"
The affiant is identified as a violent crimes detective with the Santa Fe County Sheriff's Department. The documents give no further details about the conversations.
"We proactively requested that the authorities obtain a warrant so that we could take steps to protect Mr. Baldwins family and personal information that is clearly unrelated to the investigation," Dyer said in a statement. "A phone contains a persons entire life, and personal information needs to be protected. While they evaluate the phone information, we hope that the authorities continue to focus on how the live rounds got on the set in the first place."
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/warrant-issued-alec-baldwins-cell-phone-shooting-rust-set-rcna9084
I wonder what they are looking for.
SarcasticSatyr
(1,183 posts)and not done any interviews ...
Skittles
(153,226 posts)that certainly can work against you
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Affidavit to get the search warrant doesn't mention anything about his interview. Not that giving an interview was a good idea.
SarcasticSatyr
(1,183 posts)He says he never pulled the trigger, what if his text messages say something else, He never should have said anything ...
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)Which he was obviously free to ignore.
The Stephanopoulos interview is probably whats behind this. He was deflecting all over the place.
Someones to blame but its not me.
no_hypocrisy
(46,234 posts)Not under oath and on record. And will be used against him by prosecutors if necessary.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)way to go at the time. The question to everyone should be "how did live ammunition EVER appear on a movie set?" Somebody must have brought it there on their own. WHO would do that and WHY?
That's what investigators must be looking at. The other question is how did live ammo go off if the "gun" was not real?
jmowreader
(50,567 posts)The crew was taking the prop guns to a pistol range and firing live ammo through them.
All movies that use guns are required to have a gun wrangler. The big question here is why the gun wrangler didnt unload the gun and reload it with filming ammunition before handing it to Baldwin.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I'm guessing that the producers didn't know about the live ammo being even THERE. If the gun wrangler didn't know about the live ammo, he/she didn't know it was even a possibility and hence, did not check it. Of course, it should have been checked anyway because you just never can tell what might happen when dealing with guns.
But, even so, how is it that Baldwin didn't know to check it himself?
jmowreader
(50,567 posts)When the armorer hands an actor a gun, the actor is not allowed to do anything but act. If the actor opens the weapon to check it for live ammunition, the gun is considered not-safe, and it must be handed back to the armorer for that persons approval.
More fun: the gun in question was a single-action revolver. To check such a gun for live vs filming ammo you have to remove the rounds one-by-one. If you have an automatic pistol doing thats no problem; hit the magazine catch to drop the mag, rack the slide and inspect the barrel to ensure theres not one in the chamber, and inspect the ammo in the magazine. But on SA revolvers, things are a bit different. The cylinder - the part on the gun you load - doesnt swing out like it does on a double-action. Instead, theres a little door behind the cylinder. You have to rotate the cylinder until the cartridge will come out and push on an extractor rod to push it out
for every cartridge in the pistol. Baldwin might not even know how to do it, and he might not be able to tell the difference between a live round and a filming round. They hired this guy because he speaks well and looks good, not because he knows anything about firearms.
ripcord
(5,553 posts)That is going to cost the producers, why have an armorer if they aren't going to be on set when firearms are in use?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)was how cheap the producers were. I found that to be an interesting statement.
gab13by13
(21,440 posts)I'm talking to Merrick Garland.
ripcord
(5,553 posts)They may want to know why the armorer was working as a prop assistant at the time of the shooting instead of being on the set when a firearm was being used.
cayugafalls
(5,646 posts)affiant and Alex (affiant's phone would have the back and forth), there must have been something in the text messages from Alex that hinted at other discussions/pictures/emails/gpsdata with others regarding the event.
That would be the only reason needed to search the phone.
The main text message thread is not the issue here, imnsho as a techy.
Roy Rolling
(6,941 posts)Why was there a live round on a movie set? Did Alec know, and did he have a text conversation with anybody mentioning it. Thats my interest if Im a prosecutor.
Everything else is secondary.
(From a person with over 300 movie/TV projects, I know the process)
Kaleva
(36,361 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 17, 2021, 08:22 PM - Edit history (1)
If there is no such law, then I fail to see why a prosecutor would be interested in such.
Kaleva
(36,361 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,941 posts)Movie sets are private companies, the union workplace rules and producer rules prevent the carry of firearms, ammunition, and other items in the workplace.
Live ammunition in the workplace is against company rules, regardless of whether New Mexico law backs the regulation.
Which is why its such a key point in the investigationa rule hammered in the head of every employee almost daily would be so blatantly broken.
Who brought the bullet?
Kaleva
(36,361 posts)Prosecutors don't enforce union rules.
Your comment:
"the union workplace rules and producer rules prevent the carry of firearms, ammunition, and other items in the workplace."
What do the company rules and union rules say about safely handling a gun? Do they require all who handle a gun to first attend and complete a firearm safety course? Or do they not give a shit?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)marshall
(6,665 posts)She reports that her safety protocols were overruled (by whom?) and furthermore that she was not allowed on the set at the time of the incident, ostensibly because of Covid restrictions. Where did those decisions come from?
ripcord
(5,553 posts)Everyone says the armorer was responsible for the gun why was she not there when a gun was being used?
onecaliberal
(32,931 posts)When they're going after dems it sure as fuck doesn't take any time to do anything.