Biden Urges Congress to Immediately Recognize Equal Rights Amendment
Source: US News and World Report
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden on Thursday called on Congress to immediately act to enshrine the Equal Rights Amendment in the U.S. Constitution and formally protect women's rights decades after lawmakers adopted them.
Biden, in a statement released by the White House, urged Congress "to pass a resolution recognizing ratification of the ERA" after a recent legal analysis said there was nothing preventing lawmakers from acting.
"We must recognize the clear will of the American people and definitively enshrine the principle of gender equality in the Constitution. It is long past time that we put all doubt to rest," Biden said. "No one should be discriminated against based on their sexand we, as a nation, must stand up for full womens equality."
Biden's call comes amid ongoing legal jostling over the deadline to enact the ERA, which passed Congress in the early 1970s with a 1982 deadline to be enacted if 38 state legislatures voted to approve.
Read more: https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2022-01-27/biden-urges-congress-to-immediately-recognize-equal-rights-amendment
Statement from President Biden on the Equal Rights Amendment
Today, as the House announces a resolution on the Equal Rights Amendment, I once again want to express my support for the ERA loudly and clearly. I have been a strong supporter of the ERA ever since I first ran for the Senate as a 29-year-old. We must recognize the clear will of the American people and definitively enshrine the principle of gender equality in the Constitution. It is long past time that we put all doubt to rest. I am calling on Congress to act immediately to pass a resolution recognizing ratification of the ERA. As the recently published Office of Legal Counsel memorandum makes clear, there is nothing standing in Congresss way from doing so. No one should be discriminated against based on their sexand we, as a nation, must stand up for full womens equality.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)the party that protects every zygote, protects NO living woman or girl. Of course.
turbinetree
(24,720 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,631 posts)Rachel Maddow brought this up on her show last night, which was part of the impetus for Reagan promising a woman would be his first SC nominee (Reagan was anti-ERA...I know, shocker).
amb123
(1,581 posts)When Reagan got the nomination in 1980, the ERA plank was removed.
"We're not talking about Equal Rights, we're talking about Women's Rights."
- Congressman & Future Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott
Ray Bruns
(4,112 posts)Mitch McConnell
durablend
(7,465 posts)Joe Manchin
Budi
(15,325 posts)Susan Collins
IronLionZion
(45,541 posts)Kyrsten Sinema
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)If it did, it could just bypass the requirement that stated ratify an amendment by passing a resolution that a proposed amendment was ratified immediately after passing a proposed amendment.
thesquanderer
(11,993 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)note that the OP article indicates..,.
The US NARA and courts decide when ratification has occurred.
FBaggins
(26,762 posts)The current problem is that the courts so far have said that the deadline expired years ago and no further ratifications have any effect.
Congress could try another extension (it's an open question whether they can "extend" something that is not currently active), but that couldn't be done with just a resolution.
MichMan
(11,979 posts)FBaggins
(26,762 posts)I'd say instead that the administration's advisors (legal or otherwise) think it's politically advantageous to reopen the conversation in time for the coming election.
But Congress doesn't play a role in declaring an amendment to have been ratified - particularly after federal courts have said that it hasn't been.
What Congress could try is to pass legislation extending the deadline for ratification (assuming they could get past a filibuster), but that could still run afoul of the courts.
calimary
(81,514 posts)of other bills the GOP would not oppose too stridently.
If I were in Congress, I might be trying that on several bills, in several ways.
If they won't open the door, then can we slip it in through the mail slot? Or through the cat door? Or through a side window? Or... ?
DemocraticPatriot
(4,428 posts)(regardless of all the legal minutae)
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)and have Republicans vote against it.
BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)Ive given up hope that Id see it in my lifetime. It would be sooo great!
Thank you, Mr. President.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)Cha
(297,733 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,619 posts)FakeNoose
(32,777 posts)I can't believe the Equal Rights Amendment is still hanging after all these years.
Makes me wonder why Chump didn't do this 5 years ago? It was the Repuke women who got him elected, after all.
Polybius
(15,497 posts)The expiration date won't hold. RGB even said it.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg probably just dealt a fatal blow to the Equal Rights Amendment