Manchin Open to Liberal-Leaning Justice, a Key Signal for Biden
Source: Bloomberg
- Qualifications more important than ideology, Democrat says
- Democrats can confirm nominee if party maintains unity
Democratic Senator Joe Manchin said Thursday he could vote to confirm a Supreme Court nominee with a more liberal philosophy than his own, a positive signal for President Joe Biden as he prepares to name a successor to retiring Justice Stephen Breyer.
The nominees philosophical beliefs will not prohibit me from supporting somebody, he said in an interview in his home state of West Virginia.
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-27/manchin-says-he-could-back-justice-with-more-liberal-philosophy
* Paywall, looking for more info.
Midnight Writer
(21,753 posts)I'm not being snarky. He seems to put a lot of stock in Senate traditions.
FBaggins
(26,731 posts)A "hold" in this case is just a denial of unanimous consent - it's can't block a SCOTUS nominee
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)durablend
(7,460 posts)yaesu
(8,020 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)Javaman
(62,521 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(10,429 posts)Too bad Manchin didn't feel that strongly about qualifications when he voted to confirm a guy who drank his way through school and literally has no idea how many women he'd assaulted.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,583 posts)I don't recall where the Constitution grants the right to select a SCOTUS nominee to a single senator. Well, there is that case where Moscow Mitch refused to even consider Obama's right to choose Scalia's successor ---
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)HUAJIAO
(2,383 posts)kacekwl
(7,016 posts)STFU and vote with your party.
onenote
(42,700 posts)Didn't read the story, I guess.
OrlandoDem2
(2,065 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)you are and he will keep hemming and hawing and moving the goalposts just like he has done before until ultimately saying something like "we are too close to an election", "I tried but Biden is too radical" etc.
3catwoman3
(23,975 posts)OneBro
(1,159 posts)Manchin takes his moves right out of the Republican playbook. They are seasoned extortionists who make demands, get what they want, then make more demands. Rinse and repeat until forced to vote, then vote NO because the final demands were not met.
Manchin united with Republicans to vote against his own f*cking voting rights bill!!!
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)IF a white, male who leans a bit right is put onto that high court courtesy of that jackass from West Virginia, that will most definitely depress black vote for the mid-terms, and we know WHY.
LudwigPastorius
(9,137 posts)"...just their views on regulating coal-burning power plants, carbon taxes, and climate change in general".
Joinfortmill
(14,417 posts)padah513
(2,502 posts)We need 52+ Senators
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)ColinC
(8,291 posts)And yes, I do expect to see at least one or two republicans support whoever is nominated.
Of course, we all know there would be no vote on anybody if the Republicans had control.
Mawspam2
(729 posts)...a Supreme Court nominee with a more liberal philosophy than his own"
IOW... Robert Bork.
Carlitos Brigante
(26,500 posts).
Rebl2
(13,497 posts)open to it?
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)He probably think Garland is liberal.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Too much hedging in this statement.
Martin68
(22,794 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)Bipartisan you know
ecstatic
(32,698 posts)The Wizard
(12,542 posts)change his demands?