Arizona bill would allow legislature to overturn election results
Source: The Hill
An arch conservative member of Arizona's state House of Representatives has proposed a mammoth overhaul of the state's voting procedures that would allow legislators to overturn the results of a primary or general election after months of unfounded allegations and partisan audits.
The bill, introduced by state Rep. John Fillmore (R), would substantially change the way Arizonans vote by eliminating most early and absentee voting and requiring people to vote in their home precincts, rather than at vote centers set up around the state.
Most dramatically, Fillmore's bill would require the legislature to hold a special session after an election to review election processes and results, and to "accept or reject the election results."
The proposal comes after President Biden became the first Democrat since former President Clinton to win Arizona's electoral votes. He defeated former President Trump there by just under 11,000 votes, or about three-tenths of a percentage point.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/arizona-bill-would-allow-legislature-to-overturn-election-results/ar-AATcHtb?li=BBnb7Kz
Ray Bruns
(4,093 posts)rockfordfile
(8,702 posts)orangecrush
(19,546 posts)Will be all over that.
gab13by13
(21,323 posts)when a bogus company, Cyber Ninjas, had access to ballots, voter information, election materials and equipment which should have remained in the possession of election officials. Clearly violations of state and federal laws.
leftieNanner
(15,084 posts)I think that's it.
gab13by13
(21,323 posts)and in that letter DOJ warned them not to go door to door looking for voter fraud. They still went door to door.
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)c-rational
(2,592 posts)cstanleytech
(26,290 posts)via the power to reject results that would remove themselves from office.
I believe this would be unconstitutional under several amendments and the Guarantee Clause. (Guarantees a republican form of government to each state).
LoisB
(7,203 posts)Magoo48
(4,708 posts)Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Bumblers in legislatures can introduce toilet paper if they like.
Deminpenn
(15,285 posts)doesn't result in huge and ongoing protests. Know these proposals sound do-able, but I don't think any of them are in reality.
SCantiGOP
(13,869 posts)the courts would not immediately step in and throw this crap out.
Yes, the states have a lot of leeway to establish the voting rules and procedures, but two things I don't think could ever get by the courts are procedures that deny some people the right to vote, or any crap like saying the State Legislature can arbitrarily overturn an election result.
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)gab13by13
(21,323 posts)Once a law is passed it is harder to get it repealed, it would have to go all the way to the SC and at least 3 members of the SC have voiced opinions that the states have absolute authority to run their own elections.
intheflow
(28,463 posts)To overturn valid election results is another thing altogether.
onecaliberal
(32,852 posts)LaMouffette
(2,030 posts)United States. Apparently, there is a migration going on out of blue states like California and New York. Arizona is one destination:
Overall, household moves among Americans are down this year and predictions about a permanent urban exodus appear to be overstated. But based on voter registration data, U.S. Census data, and an analysis of Redfin.com searches, migration out of New York and California in the four years since the 2016 election has already reshaped the 2020 political map. Population gains in Arizona and Nevada have come with a larger electorate of Democrats. And if the trends hold, the states may only get bluer.
[link:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-02/how-covid-migration-may-change-the-political-map|
So Arizona is turning blue and this John Fillmore is going to hold his breath and turn blue, too (until he gets his way and Repubs can reject Democratic victories).
FoxNewsSucks
(10,429 posts)and could pass some kind of law that would protect voters, voters' rights, and ensure secure fair elections to prevent this kind of blatant cheating power-grab.
onecaliberal
(32,852 posts)Igel
(35,300 posts)to overturn state election results for federal-level offices--not seat winners or not accept EC votes. Every presidential election there are some who try this, either for real or symbolically, 2021 seeing the most ever by a wide margin to reject Biden's electors, 2017 seeing a spike in those who wanted to reject Trump's.
From time to time a representative's been left unseated; more often, the idea is floated and nothing comes of it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unseated_members_of_the_United_States_Congress#1967-2009:_Contested_elections_and_corruption_charges
The EC vote-count act proposals all include some mechanism for disposing of electors. If an election is blatantly corrupted, you want that ability--otherwise it's not a count, it's just a receipt of the results with a nod (or not, it doesn't matter).
As for the frequency and distribution of this kind of thing among the states ... No clue. I don't assume the MSM is going to provide a reasoned random sample.
Javaman
(62,521 posts)just another grift and or money laundering set up under the usual right wing guise of "accountability".
StClone
(11,683 posts)But history lessons are banned in these state so WE are all taken along with the damned to repeat it.
Lunabell
(6,080 posts)Right?
twodogsbarking
(9,739 posts)Maybe this could me modified, eh.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Whose legislature overturns a federal election.
mahina
(17,648 posts)KS Toronado
(17,220 posts)With solid majorities in both Houses after the midterms, we'll be able to shape this country
into something that is fair and just for everybody.
Emile
(22,707 posts)and go unpunished, this shit will continue.
Justice matters.
(6,928 posts)patphil
(6,172 posts)Next they'll pass a law doing away with elections all together.
After all, what's the point if the election effectively becomes a non-binding opinion poll.
intheflow
(28,463 posts)of Arizona's false elector slate, also in the news today.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)BradAllison
(1,879 posts)Probably nothing. She won't run again, she's got her coin.
Martin68
(22,794 posts)ecstatic
(32,699 posts)Should that bill make it to the governor's desk. Smh