Women's March pushes for impeachment of Justice Thomas over wife's texts
Source: The Hill
The Women's March is calling for the impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas after the release of text messages showing his wife, Ginni Thomas, pushed for then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to stick to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
"The revelations that Ginni Thomas advocated for the overthrow of our democracy are disqualifying - not just for her as a human being of any decency, but for her husband Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas," Women's March Executive Director Rachel O' Leary Carmona said in a statement.
Link to tweet
"From the day he was nominated to the Court, Thomas has always acted less like a reasonable jurist and more like his wife - that is to say a professional conservative activist," Carmona added. "He is hopelessly compromised, conflicted, and corrupt, and he must be impeached IMMEDIATELY."
The Hill has reached out to Thomas for comment.
Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/womens-march-pushes-impeachment-justice-164101734.html
hamsterjill
(15,224 posts)Good!
Evolve Dammit
(16,781 posts)Lovie777
(12,356 posts)Although Thomas will refuse to bow out because his GAWD tells him so.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,449 posts)now what?
I applaud them for calling for his impeachment, but the stark reality is that he won't be convicted and removed by the Senate, no matter how much he deserves to be removed.
FBaggins
(26,775 posts)I doubt that even a majority of House Democrats would vote to impeach.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,449 posts)I doubt that Speaker Pelosi would even bring it to the floor, she's far to smart for that.
Jacson6
(355 posts)She is her own person and is entitled to advocate for her political views.
bucolic_frolic
(43,364 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 25, 2022, 04:23 PM - Edit history (1)
and they're owned by the money that got them where they are? What if their texts indicate belief in the overthrow of democratic elections, of the government itself?
And btw https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216524861
choie
(4,111 posts)that thomas was the only justice to vote against trump having to provide January 6th relevant documents to congress. You know: DOCUMENTS THAT WOULD SHOW THAT HIS WIFE TEXTED MARK MEADOWS.
marie999
(3,334 posts)Diamond_Dog
(32,118 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,364 posts)Binding their beliefs together is another thing, unless the texts between them indicate Clarence Thomas has pre-decided cases. Most people would not consider that a good thing for a SCOTUS Justice.
NYC Liberal
(20,138 posts)spooky3
(34,498 posts)In which her activities were involved:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/31/ginni-thomas-clarence-thomas-conflict-jan6-committee/
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,811 posts)And there is proof he was.
Proving comiplicity on his part will be hard to prove.
Deuxcents
(16,370 posts)Could they be scrutinized?
There is no mechanism to review what a justice says or does. Except impeachable offenses, and anything they say or write or decide is not impeachable when it deals with cases before them.
The only real retort is another case over riding what they have said before, which is extremely extremely rare. Thats why Roe vs Wade is still the law, they really wont decide against it. But they can be very narrow or broad in a case. Aka the texas case, they can find it narrowly constitutional, with out invalidating Roe vs Wade over all.
Which is what I expect, they wont tear down Roe vs Wade, but the might "define" something with the texas case as constitutional, but not against Roe vs Wade.
Trueblue1968
(17,242 posts)Josh Marshall @joshtpm
·
3h
Hypothetical: Can a Supreme Court Justice credibly carry on in office if it is revealed that his spouse was involved in a
coup to overthrow the government?
2naSalit
(86,843 posts)Polybius
(15,510 posts)Do they think that Ginni is Thomas' property?
sanatanadharma
(3,740 posts)So was SC Justice Thomas incredibly ignorant of his wife's work...
Or is he guilty of knowing and saying nothing about a plot to overturn 200-plus years of USA Constitutional peaceful transfer of power history?
Is he a fool or a tool?
paleotn
(17,989 posts)in the ruling over Trump turning over White House documents. Even "I like beer" and "the Handmaid" didn't side with him.
Cha
(297,807 posts)Warpy
(111,383 posts)Had Silent Cal himself been shooting his mouth off, then there might be a reason to impeach. That is not the case.
His wife is a hard line lunatic with a big mouth and has been for years. That's protected under the first amendment.
Yes, he's one of the worst USSC (in)justices this country has ever had. Unfortunately, we're stuck with him until he retires or kicks the bucket.