Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,974 posts)
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 05:38 PM Sep 2022

Judge unseals less redacted version of affidavit used for Mar-a-Lago search warrant

Source: CNN

A newly unsealed version of the affidavit that federal investigators used to secure a search warrant for Mar-a-Lago revealed some previously unknown details about the classified materials that former President Donald Trump gave to the Justice Department under subpoena in June.

The less-redacted version of the previously released affidavit was unsealed Tuesday by a federal judge in Florida.

It was previously known that Trump’s lawyers provided one envelope to investigators, which contained 38 unique documents with classification markings, according to court filings. But the newly lifted redactions in the search warrant affidavit indicate that some of those classified files contained markings for “HCS, SI and FISA,” according to court filings made public on Tuesday.

These classification markings indicate that the documents were connected to extremely sensitive government programs. “HCS” refers to human sources, or spies, that often work with the CIA. “SI” refers to signals intercepts that are typically handled by the National Security Agency. And “FISA” refers to domestic surveillance and wiretaps related to counterintelligence.



Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/13/politics/less-redacted-mar-a-lago-affidavit/index.html
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge unseals less redacted version of affidavit used for Mar-a-Lago search warrant (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2022 OP
Please, can someone knowledgable opine on intrepidity Sep 2022 #1
Any thoughts on what Cannon is trying to accomplish with this? emulatorloo Sep 2022 #2
Government's case is incomplete if they can't continue to investigate the probable/possible Backseat Driver Sep 2022 #8
Cannon had nothing to do with this. This was released by the Magistrate Judge, Bruce Reinhart onenote Sep 2022 #14
Ha!!! MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2022 #17
Yep. The caption at the top of the document clearly identifies the case number, Reinhard's initials onenote Sep 2022 #18
Thank you, I was pretty sure that it wasn't Cannon that approved of it. nt MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2022 #20
Thanks! emulatorloo Sep 2022 #25
Are circuit judges allowed to effectively override national security redactions? NullTuples Sep 2022 #3
That's what I'm wondering too Bayard Sep 2022 #4
She didn't do this. This was released by Magistrate Judge Reinhart onenote Sep 2022 #15
Thank you for the clarification! NullTuples Sep 2022 #21
It probably isn't a security redaction FBaggins Sep 2022 #6
Judge Cannon is part of the conspiracy. Kid Berwyn Sep 2022 #5
In that case, so is the DOJ... brooklynite Sep 2022 #10
Sorry, my mistake. Kid Berwyn Sep 2022 #24
For the umpteenth time, this isn't in her court. This is in Magistrate Judge Reinhard's court onenote Sep 2022 #16
Really? Thanks. Kid Berwyn Sep 2022 #23
Just wondering if the FISA documents involve Trump? gab13by13 Sep 2022 #7
Probably "Russiagate" related. The documents related to the initial investigation. onenote Sep 2022 #19
I didn't see cannon's name mentioned in the story link Marthe48 Sep 2022 #9
No, we can assume DOJ asked the Judge to release them... brooklynite Sep 2022 #11
I thought more info would endanger the agents? Marthe48 Sep 2022 #12
Not what was released. brooklynite Sep 2022 #13
Different classifications mixed in one envelope?? forgotmylogin Sep 2022 #22

emulatorloo

(44,270 posts)
2. Any thoughts on what Cannon is trying to accomplish with this?
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 05:46 PM
Sep 2022

Does she somehow believe this info helps Trump? Or is she feeding info to his “lawyers” about the government’s case against Trump?

Backseat Driver

(4,402 posts)
8. Government's case is incomplete if they can't continue to investigate the probable/possible
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 06:20 PM
Sep 2022

ramifications re national security interests were compromised since the document(s) went "missing/stolen." Isn't it enough that TFG indeed had them outside an appropriately noted secure area?

onenote

(42,831 posts)
14. Cannon had nothing to do with this. This was released by the Magistrate Judge, Bruce Reinhart
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 08:33 PM
Sep 2022

A completely different case number than Cannon's case.

People are jumping to conclusions without checking the facts.

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,533 posts)
17. Ha!!!
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 08:38 PM
Sep 2022

Once again, people jumping to conclusions without even reading the article, just the headline.

Thank you for setting record straight.
If I read the article right, it was the DoJ that recommended the release of the updated redacted affidavit.

onenote

(42,831 posts)
15. She didn't do this. This was released by Magistrate Judge Reinhart
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 08:34 PM
Sep 2022

The judge that authorized the search warrant.

It's a completely different case number.

FBaggins

(26,789 posts)
6. It probably isn't a security redaction
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 06:16 PM
Sep 2022

It was probably information that they didn't want the Trump legal team to see.

brooklynite

(94,974 posts)
10. In that case, so is the DOJ...
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 07:13 PM
Sep 2022
ABC News

Justice Department makes redacted Mar-a-Lago affidavit public

The Justice Department on Friday made public the redacted affidavit that supported the search of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

After reviewing the DOJ's proposed redactions Thursday, a magistrate judge had ordered the redacted affidavit filed in the public docket by noon Friday.


Kid Berwyn

(15,060 posts)
24. Sorry, my mistake.
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 11:11 PM
Sep 2022

Don’t know about DoJ, but if Trump shopped Cannon for her Trump-friendly approach to jurisprudence, she’s a co-conspirator.

onenote

(42,831 posts)
16. For the umpteenth time, this isn't in her court. This is in Magistrate Judge Reinhard's court
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 08:36 PM
Sep 2022

And his case. Not Cannon's.

People need to stop jumping to conclusions when they don't have the facts.

onenote

(42,831 posts)
19. Probably "Russiagate" related. The documents related to the initial investigation.
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 08:43 PM
Sep 2022

Trump had a hard on for those documents.

Marthe48

(17,122 posts)
9. I didn't see cannon's name mentioned in the story link
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 06:28 PM
Sep 2022

Do we just assume it is she who is publicizing information that might help traitor in court?

Marthe48

(17,122 posts)
12. I thought more info would endanger the agents?
Tue Sep 13, 2022, 07:17 PM
Sep 2022

I hope it doesn't, hope they all know what they're doing. I was following along pretty good, but the last few days, the legal points are getting more obscure, at least to me

I appreciate your posts on different stories. Many times, I understand when you explain things.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge unseals less redact...