Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnlinePoker

(5,725 posts)
Tue Sep 27, 2022, 10:49 PM Sep 2022

Millionaire Martin Mobarak probed for torching $10M Frida Kahlo painting in NFT stunt

Source: New York Post

Who says crypto is going down in flames?

A Miami millionaire claimed to have burned a $10 million dollar work by renowned painter Frida Kahlo as part of an NFT launch — and is now being investigated by officials in the late artist’s homeland of Mexico, according the country’s National Institute of Fine Arts and Literature.

Entrepreneur Martin Mobarak filmed himself apparently setting the small and colorful Kahlo drawing ablaze at an event in July, in a stunt that was meant to promote his sale of digital versions of the rare work, which is considered a national treasure in Mexico.

Read more: https://nypost.com/2022/09/27/rare-frida-kahlo-drawing-torched-in-nft-sale/



The insanity of burning a $10 million tangible asset to turn it into crypto units boggles my mind.

On edit: I'm hoping it's a hoax and the painting was a copy, but if this is the case and he sells those NFT's, I would think that would be fraud.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Millionaire Martin Mobarak probed for torching $10M Frida Kahlo painting in NFT stunt (Original Post) OnlinePoker Sep 2022 OP
Or was it a copy? fierywoman Sep 2022 #1
See my edit. n/t OnlinePoker Sep 2022 #2
Frida.NFT says the drawing has "permanently transitioned into the Metaverse" dalton99a Sep 2022 #3
why don't we issue an NFT of Martin? harumph Sep 2022 #4
Uncharacteristically cheery for a Kahlo Warpy Sep 2022 #5
Original or no... ultralite001 Sep 2022 #6
What a horrible self centered asshole!! Beakybird Sep 2022 #7
i still don't get the NFT thing and how that is worth anything JI7 Sep 2022 #8
Me either. live love laugh Sep 2022 #9
Things are worth what people can be convinced that they're worth... Shipwack Sep 2022 #10
Even if it was still backed by gold it would only have value because cstanleytech Sep 2022 #12
Huh... 100% correct. I hadn't thought through it that far... :) NT Shipwack Sep 2022 #18
There you have it; the "greater fool" theory. oldsoftie Sep 2022 #16
Why was the painting worth anything? Orangepeel Sep 2022 #11
I've always thought pretty much the same. Its a PAINTING. oldsoftie Sep 2022 #17
It's just another silly thing to entertain bored billionaires. PSPS Sep 2022 #13
fundamentalist capitalist takes a cue from the Taliban playbook, devalues humanity (nt) FreepFryer Sep 2022 #14
Sounds sexist. Brenda Sep 2022 #15
I noticed that as well. White man vs. Brown woman. Coventina Sep 2022 #23
According to LinkedIn, he describes himself as... LudwigPastorius Sep 2022 #19
Wasn't this for a charity? 3Hotdogs Sep 2022 #20
WTHH? Joinfortmill Sep 2022 #21
jesus fucking christ prodigitalson Sep 2022 #22

Warpy

(111,338 posts)
5. Uncharacteristically cheery for a Kahlo
Tue Sep 27, 2022, 11:32 PM
Sep 2022

Does anyone know this painting? We have only his word for the artist and the worth at auction.

I don't know who's worse, this POS or all the arty wankers at his party cheering the destruction of a supposed work of art.

PIty no one thought to toss him and the painting into that pool, saving whatever the painting was.

Shipwack

(2,171 posts)
10. Things are worth what people can be convinced that they're worth...
Wed Sep 28, 2022, 01:44 AM
Sep 2022

It makes only slightly less sense than that a piece of green paper is worth a dollar... it's not even backed by gold anymore.

But yeah, I agree the whole NFT thing is worse than beanie babies, or tulip bulbs.

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)
11. Why was the painting worth anything?
Wed Sep 28, 2022, 02:48 AM
Sep 2022

It was tangible, but no different than a reproduction for practical purposes. It is/was worth $10 million because experts said it was the real one. With an NFT, there may be copies, but experts say the NFT is the real one. Not that different.

oldsoftie

(12,597 posts)
17. I've always thought pretty much the same. Its a PAINTING.
Wed Sep 28, 2022, 07:07 AM
Sep 2022

These people who pay 10-50-150 MILLION for something that COULD be made over and over are just in it for ego & the bet someone will pay more later.

Brenda

(1,072 posts)
15. Sounds sexist.
Wed Sep 28, 2022, 06:12 AM
Sep 2022

Why didn't he torch a Picasso or Monet (/copy)? No, he chose a well-known feminist artist.

LudwigPastorius

(9,169 posts)
19. According to LinkedIn, he describes himself as...
Wed Sep 28, 2022, 03:12 PM
Sep 2022

an "art alchemist transforming physical art into digital gold".

What a shithead.

3Hotdogs

(12,406 posts)
20. Wasn't this for a charity?
Wed Sep 28, 2022, 05:40 PM
Sep 2022

Even so, assholic.

I sold my photographs for a while, until it became too much of a time sink. Made a couple'a thousand.

Friend, a photographers, told me, don't fall in love with what you sell. Once you sell it, it is theirs. They can hang it where they want or store it in the basement to never be seen again. Or they can give it away or throw it away. They paid for it. It's theirs.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Millionaire Martin Mobara...