NYC Ordered to Reinstate Workers Fired for Covid Vaccine Refusal
Source: Bloomberg
New York City was ordered to reinstate a group of sanitation workers fired for refusing to get a Covid-19 vaccine after a state court judge ruled the mandate was unlawful.
In an order dated Monday, a judge in Staten Island said the city health commissioner has the authority to issue public health mandates, but cant create a new condition of employment for municipal employees, cant prohibit them from reporting to work and cant terminate employees.
Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid-19, Justice Ralph J. Forzio wrote. As of the day of this decision, CDC guidelines regarding quarantine and isolation are the same for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. The petitioners should not have been terminated for choosing not to protect themselves. We have learned through the course of the pandemic that the vaccine against Covid-19 is not absolute.
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-25/nyc-is-ordered-to-reinstate-workers-fired-for-vaccine-refusal
yankee87
(2,175 posts)The entire Qpunlican party has become a cult of death. I hope this is appealed and overturned.
Botany
(70,532 posts).... yes but it does keep the person from dying and or going to the hospital along with reducing the risk
of transmitting the disease and becoming a host to the virus.
Oh and look @ this:
Ralph Porzio (Republican Party) is a judge of the New York Supreme Court 13th Judicial District. He assumed office in 2019.
https://ballotpedia.org/Ralph_Porzio
oldsoftie
(12,565 posts)Just like the flu shot, a covid vax needs tweaking
Lokilooney
(322 posts)How many people caught Covid but because the vaccine was so effective they didn't know they had it and went about their business and ended up inadvertently spreading it.
Still firing is a bit extreme, but then again there was allot of extremes. The amount of independently owned restaurants around here that got eradicated was quite a bit, not the chain/corporate ones though, they could weather it better and now have less competition...
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)There is a lot of revisionist bullshit these days about COVID.
It was a goddamn horror.
SalamanderSleeps
(587 posts)Fuck them.
Ignorant selfish pricks.
TomSlick
(11,102 posts)BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Let the appeals process begin!
3825-87867
(851 posts)Wearing safety glasses may not protect a worker from being blinded. Safety shoes may not stop a foot from being crushed.
Safety belts or bags in cars may not save a life in a crash.
Children being required to be vaccinated against childhood diseases might not prevent spreading of those, but in most states, it's a law.
Metal detectors or armed police may not save school kids or citizens at public events or even protect public officials.
Armed bailiffs may not even guarantee safety in America's Courtrooms...except where Supremes or NRA Meetings won't allow freedom of the Second Amendment.
Yeah, no need for all those safety precautions. So let's save big business some bucks and do away with worrying about American's Safety and health!
Get the idea, yer honor? Pretty partisan excuse, bub!
Live long and prosper, yer honor. Maybe you can foist that on others. Words are stronger than science, I guess.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)I can be fired for not wearing safety glasses. If that happens I guess I'll take it to his court.
LiberalFighter
(50,983 posts)Xoan
(25,322 posts)louis-t
(23,295 posts)not one else will be hurt by that decision, therefore the judge's order is flawed.
Grins
(7,218 posts)Now what are you going to do, judge?
Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid-19. - Dumbass judge .
It sure as fuck helps! And keeps you alive and the city functioning. And at what cost to the city for those who listen to Fox and idiots like you?
moonshinegnomie
(2,460 posts)dont rehire them. if the judge complains tough shit. last i checked the judge ahs no actual enforcement activity and as TFG has shown laws can be ignored...
onenote
(42,715 posts)What makes you think he can't hold the city, and the city health commissioner, in contempt of court, subject to daily fines and ultimately jail time?
I see this increasingly on DU and its disturbing -- the idea that its perfectly okay for the losing party to ignore judicial rulings.
And while Trump is a master of pursuing the judicial options available for challenging or delaying the implementation of an order, that's not the same as simply ignoring an order.
moonshinegnomie
(2,460 posts)the judge can issue any order he want but it falls to the executive branch to actually enforce the order.
for example.
Judge hold somone in contempt.
orders them taken into custody and delivered to jail
and the executive branch can just release them...
onenote
(42,715 posts)What law school did you go to?
moonshinegnomie
(2,460 posts)in a couple of ways
1) the pardon
2) prisoners get released early all the time thru the executive branch. no court involved. sometimes it due to overcrowding. sometime for other reason. like I said a judge can order anything he want but he has no way to actually excute the judgement. all the people charged with executing teh judgment are part of teh executive branch
onenote
(42,715 posts)Really. I'd love to hear why your great idea isn't used every time a court rules against the government.
Polybius
(15,461 posts)I know, he was at my sister's wedding and in my house when he was a young lawyer decades ago. I was 9, so I didn't talk politics with him then.
Aristus
(66,409 posts)There's still the possibility that the anti-maskers and anti-vaxxers could pick up the infection and die from it before they've had a chance to vote.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)hire them back, but they pay double for their health insurance. Taxpayers shouldnt subsidize stupidity.
Let them sue again.