Silicon Valley Bank employees received bonuses hours before government takeover
Source: CNBC
Silicon Valley Bank employees received their annual bonuses Friday just hours before regulators seized the failing bank, according to people with knowledge of the payments.
The Santa Clara, California-based bank has historically paid employee bonuses on the second Friday of March, said the people, who declined to be identified speaking about the awards. The payments were for work done in 2022 and had been in process days before the banks collapse, the sources said.
This year, bonus day happened to fall on SVBs final day of independence. The institution, in the throes of a bank run triggered by panicked venture capital investors and startup founders, was seized by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) around midday Friday.
On Friday, SVB CEO Greg Becker addressed workers in a two-minute video in which he said that he no longer made decisions at the 40-year-old bank, according to the people. The size of the payouts couldnt be determined, but SVB bonuses range from about $12,000 for associates to $140,000 for managing directors, according to Glassdoor.com.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/11/silicon-valley-bank-employees-received-bonuses-hours-before-takeover.html
RussBLib
(9,027 posts)And what timing. Somehow I would think that "Managing Directors" and higher probably got more than $140k.
Wonder what other news will come out? $1 billion mysteriously missing? Hackers get away with billions?
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)RockRaven
(14,982 posts)week prior to the failure. It bears noting that these failures are much more sudden from the outside than the inside.
IronLionZion
(45,474 posts)toesonthenose
(136 posts)BECKER GREGORY W President and CEO Feb 27 Option Exercise 105.18 12,451 1,309,596 105,003 Mar 01 05:12 PM
BECKER GREGORY W President and CEO Feb 27 Sale 287.42 12,451 3,578,652 92,552 Mar 01 05:12 PM
Beck Daniel J Chief Financial Officer Feb 27 Sale 287.59 2,000 575,180 4,207 Mar 01 05:18 PM
keithbvadu2
(36,853 posts)Stuart G
(38,438 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,240 posts)mpcamb
(2,871 posts)They drove the bus off the cliff!
They'll make honest businesses fail!
More than anything else, this America at it's worst!
Letting big criminals off the hook.
The managers shouldn't get bus fare!
IronLionZion
(45,474 posts)Yeah, those were wild times. I'm not excited about a repeat.
crickets
(25,981 posts)The behavior is so typical, it's become a trope. Stop 'saving' these people and start putting them in jail, especially the big fish at the top.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)This is not a normal run on a bank - no "public" customers - it's where funds are parked for start-ups & venture capitalists
1 - I don't blame the workers At All - as stated in above story, it is for work they did in 2022 and seems to be part of their benefits package
2 - The bank sold stock to raise some capital for some fund, which worried worried libertarian/GQP Peter Thiel so he started the rumor that the bank was collapsing and to close their accounts.
From some of the stories my DH & I have read, some asshole was denied funding, whispered in Thiel's ear and he is the one that started the ball rolling.
Again, this ain't a normal bank run...
BumRushDaShow
(129,237 posts)But as we know, 45 all but gutted and ignored Dodd-Frank and as it is now coming out, SVB warning signs were happening well before now -
Mayra Rodriguez Valladares Senior Contributor
Mar 11, 2023, 12:24pm EST
Silicon Valley Banks demise has led many pundits to blame rising interest rates, panicked depositors, bank regulators, and rating agencies. Rising rates are inanimate actors, and depositors, regulators, and rating agencies do not run banks. SVBs VB -3% Chief Executive Officer Greg Becker, his team, and the banks Board of Directors are responsible for this colossal failure, which now not only leaves numerous depositors without their money but is likely to lead to significant layoffs at companies who had their money at SVB.
Significant asset size growth, reliance on largely homogeneous depositors, as well as concentrations in investments and in liabilities were signaling trouble at SVB since at least 2019. Banks are opaque institutions. Anyone analyzing a bank needs countless hours, not only to analyze financial disclosures, but also Basel III disclosures, which are focused on risk. And by the time any of us see their financials, that information is already old because financials are usually published several weeks after the quarter ends. Yet, even looking at aggregated data about SVB, a number of signs would have told investors, lenders, and credit analysts that SVB had problems.
Asset Growth and Quality
The first step in analyzing a banks financial health involves looking at its assets. This entails looking at data to tell us about asset growth, diversification, credit quality, and measuring assets sensitivity to interest rate movements, both small and especially large. From 2019 to the end of 2020, SVBs assets, meaning loans, credit facilities, securities, and other investments grew 63%. And from 2020 to the end of 2021, total bank assets grew over 83%. This significant asset growth happened in years when Covid-19 caused death, illness, and lockdowns. Loans alone grew almost 114% from 2019 to 2020 and then almost 30% from 2020 to 2021. Silicon Valley Bank's asset growth and its loan growth, in particular, were signs that risk managers might not manage the accompanying rising risks. With a rise in assets comes more risk. What should have also caused eyebrows to raise was when risk weighted assets went up 13% at a time that asset size barely moved from 2021 to the end of 2022.
(snip)
Was SVB running a stress to see how liquid we would be in a period of stress? We do not know. Thanks to all those politicians and bank lobbyists who fought hard to lower risk management requirements for banks under $250 billion assets, SVB was not required to disclose how much it had in high quality liquid assets to help it cover net cash outflows in a period of stress. Part of the Basel III definition of stress certainly includes testing fleeing deposits. These regulatory changes were signed into law by President Trump in 2018 as part of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, which eased requirements put in place in the aftermath of the 2008 Financial Crisis under Dodd-Frank and the Consumer Protection Act.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mayrarodriguezvalladares/2023/03/11/warning-signals-about-silicon-valley-bank-were-all-around-us/?sh=180832db1e10
This all started to happen BEFORE loons like Thiel and his ilk put a nail in their coffin.