Transgender lawmaker silenced by Montana House speaker until she apologizes
Source: AP
By AMY BETH HANSON today
HELENA, Mont. (AP) Montanas House speaker on Thursday refused to allow a transgender lawmaker to speak about bills on the House floor until she apologizes for saying lawmakers would have blood on their hands if they supported a bill to ban gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth, the lawmaker said.
Rep. Zooey Zephyr, who was deliberately misgendered by a conservative group of lawmakers demanding her censure after Tuesdays comments, said she will not apologize, creating a standoff between the first-term state lawmaker and Republican legislative leaders.
Speaker Matt Regier refused to acknowledge Zephyr on Thursday when she wanted to comment on a bill seeking to put a binary definition of male and female into state code.
It is up to me to maintain decorum here on the House floor, to protect the dignity and integrity, Regier said Thursday. And any representative that I dont feel can do that will not be recognized.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/transgender-lawmaker-silenced-montana-censure-ee3e30ee6a1cd7c0faa8fd072d580a94
Lulu KC
(2,574 posts)Could he be any more obviously bigoted? I wonder how this will end.
rpannier
(24,338 posts)It will remain a stalemate, nothing will change unless something unexpected happens
Lovie777
(12,327 posts)2naSalit
(86,780 posts)Meets once every two years for 90 days, the session ends in a week or two.
With a self proclaimed "freedumb caucus" super majority they will run roughshod over our rights until we get outside help to stop them.
Wild blueberry
(6,655 posts)Rep. Zephyr accurately describes consequences of their cruel bill. Persist! We support you.
moose65
(3,168 posts)Republicans lecturing anyone on "decorum" is freaking hilarious.
Marthe48
(17,021 posts)and integrity in their little finger than a super majority has in all of its bullies. Excelsior!
The Grand Illuminist
(1,336 posts)Because the right gave us no other choice.
CincyDem
(6,386 posts)
is that every one of these snowflake over reactions puts a much bitter spotlight on the message (and the messenger).
Had they let her speak her 5 minutes or whatever, nobody but the people in the chamber woukf even know what she said. It wouldnt be news.
So
while its appalling she was silenced
I hope she leverages her 15 minutes on the national stage to shove their actions back down their collective throats sideways.
ananda
(28,876 posts)You just can't do that to poor widdle Republicans.
moose65
(3,168 posts)But it seems like these crazy Republicans don't have any issues with trans men. It's like they don't even care about them at all - but let a trans woman open her mouth and they go fucking crazy.
Why is that? The psychology behind that is fascinating to me.
chowder66
(9,080 posts)bases riled up to vote. Granted there a few exceptions where some of these idiots actually do hate everyone.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 21, 2023, 10:04 PM - Edit history (1)
Maintaining & enforcing social hierarchies is much, much easier if they are assumed to be "pure", like the assumption of a pure, biological and social binary of (hetero, cis) men and women only. Anyone who blurs those lines is seen as a threat to power. The same structure was/is assumed & used for race; someone is either White, or...a "person of color" (ie everyone not-white).
But also,
A trans man going from a lower level of social privilege to a higher level of social privilege is acceptable; it confirms that men "belong" at the top and that it's something to strive for.
Going from greater social privilege to less is not acceptable as it calls the social structure itself into question. And because in their minds no man would rationally decide to go through the cost, effort and scorn of moving from greater social privilege to less...well, that also calls into question whether it's really a choice at all. And for all these years they've been insisting being LGBTQ is a choice. So they run into more cognitive dissonance.
moose65
(3,168 posts)I knew it had to do with some misogynistic concept of men being inherently "better" than women.
To them, a woman who wants to be a man would be a noble thing, I guess. The other way around is unimaginable to them.
I have seen many online comments that make me shake my head. These people literally believe that there are men somewhere who just wake up one morning and say, "Gee, I think I'll be a woman today." They can't wrap their head around the concept that someone assigned male at birth would have to gall to reject that.
They say this all the time about trans women athletes. They think that some male athlete decided to "own them" by claiming to be female in order to win the game/medal/prize. If that were true, as I point out, wouldn't trans women be dominating in every sport?
Also, I laugh at that because the macho cisgender male athletes that I've known in my life would NEVER entertain the idea of becoming a woman just to win at sports. That would be unthinkable to them!
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Post removed
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)He? You know she is a she right? She should not at all fucking apologize! She did absolutely nothing wrong. She spoke the fucking truth. Kids will die by suicide due to their dysphoria and no treatment to help prevent it.
Celerity
(43,501 posts)Shameful.
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)No way that was by accident