Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,608 posts)
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 01:33 PM Mar 5

Christian employers do not have to cover gender transition, judge rules

Source: Reuters

March 5, 2024 10:24 AM EST


March 4 (Reuters) - A Christian business group and its members do not have to offer health insurance coverage to employees for gender transition treatments, a North Dakota federal judge ruled Monday.

U.S. District Judge Daniel Traynor in Bismarck ruled that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot make the Christian Employers Alliance (CEA) comply with rules requiring that coverage.

The ruling, which grants summary judgment to the CEA on key issues in the case, comes nearly two years after Traynor temporarily shielded the group against the rules while he heard the case.

"The court was on firm ground to stop the administration from enforcing these unlawful mandates that disrespect people of faith," Matt Bowman of the conservative legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, a lawyer for the CEA, said in a statement. The EEOC and HHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/christian-employers-do-not-have-cover-gender-transition-judge-rules-2024-03-04/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Christian employers do not have to cover gender transition, judge rules (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Mar 5 OP
Employer's faith becomes workers' faith. SarahD Mar 5 #1
I think it's more a financial decision jimfields33 Mar 5 #2
Some probably already do in rural areas where no one makes a fuss about it because "jobs." Lonestarblue Mar 5 #3
Likely to stand for the forseable future FBaggins Mar 5 #4
It is long overdue for a company to moniss Mar 5 #5
I see what's happening. twodogsbarking Mar 5 #6

SarahD

(1,249 posts)
1. Employer's faith becomes workers' faith.
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 01:41 PM
Mar 5

Just a matter of time until your boss can demand you attend his church.

Lonestarblue

(10,095 posts)
3. Some probably already do in rural areas where no one makes a fuss about it because "jobs."
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 01:57 PM
Mar 5

These theocrats have already denied healthcare for women. If they get more power, most medical research will be shut down because much of it relies on stem cells obtained from abortions and excess eggs from IVF treatments. Alabama is showing us the goal.

FBaggins

(26,773 posts)
4. Likely to stand for the forseable future
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 02:45 PM
Mar 5

They chose wisely with their presumed judge shopping.

The circuit leans left at the district level (about 2-1), but if you draw a Trump judge at this level (as they did)... the appellate court is 16-1 red.

And little reason to think that SCOTUS will do anything with it.

moniss

(4,274 posts)
5. It is long overdue for a company to
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 02:47 PM
Mar 5

say they don't have to cover for anything that happens to anybody while at church, taking part in any religious activities etc. and that includes their kids who get hurt while playing sports etc. for any religious school they attend.

Sauce gander? Sauce goose!!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Christian employers do no...