Trump to Sue Judge in Last-Ditch Attempt to Avert Manhattan Trial
Source: New York Times
April 8, 2024 Updated 12:18 p.m. ET
Donald J. Trump, a week away from standing trial in Manhattan on criminal charges that he falsified records to cover up a sex scandal, has indicated he plans to file a lawsuit against the judge overseeing the case.
The lawsuit was not immediately made public, but court records showed on Monday that Mr. Trump was filing an action against the judge, Juan M. Merchan, in an 11th-hour bid to delay the case. An online court docket where Mr. Trump is filing the action showed that the related paperwork was sealed.
Two people with knowledge of the matter said that Mr. Trumps lawyers on Monday planned to file the action calling on an appeals court to delay the trial and to challenge a gag order that Justice Merchan recently imposed on the former president. The order prevents Mr. Trump from attacking witnesses, prosecutors and the judges own family.
Mr. Trumps unorthodox move essentially an appeal in the form of a lawsuit is unlikely to succeed, particularly so close to trial. And the appeals court might act fast to reject it. A single appeals court judge will most likely issue a preliminary ruling on Monday, setting up a full five-judge panel to consider Mr. Trumps request in the coming days.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/08/nyregion/trump-hush-money-trial-delay.html
No paywall (gift)
Turbineguy
(37,359 posts)Kennah
(14,290 posts)FarPoint
(12,417 posts)He could blame it on the Eclipse...hahaha
Irish_Dem
(47,184 posts)He will never stop.
yankee87
(2,175 posts)of the courthouse. He'll do anything to avoid responsibility.
CrispyQ
(36,487 posts)I know the article says the ploy is unlikely to succeed but I don't have a lot of confidence in our justice system anymore.
MadameButterfly
(1,062 posts)and he's found the necessary judges to give him just enough credence to delay. This is our last hope and if some appeals judge we don't know lets it cause delay, or if SCOTUS gets their hand on it, it's all over
Oopsie Daisy
(2,666 posts)* and wanted to get-even. "Unfair! Unfair!"
iluvtennis
(19,864 posts)ShazzieB
(16,451 posts)Just like a his other frivolous lawsuits.
I wouldn't be surprised to learn that he's had more lawsuits thrown out in his lifetime than most people ever file.
If I hear this suit actually has legs, I'll worry about it then
lastlib
(23,257 posts)(...and I don't mean the lawyer....)
And then padlock the dumpster until the trash pickup gets to the landfill. Then quarantine the landfill.....
Comfortably_Numb
(3,809 posts)And nappies. And its time to sanction these blowhard lawyers for filing frivolous lawsuits. Fuck em all.
MiniMe
(21,718 posts)Cough cough
FakeNoose
(32,680 posts)This BS would have all gone away years ago. Who cares that he slept with her? Nobody. I don't think even Melania cares. It's the fact that he paid Daniels hush money and then tried to pass it off as a legitimate "campaign" expense. So Uncle Sam cares.
For E. Jean Carroll he could have swept it under a rug by apologizing to her (back when it happened 30 years ago) and offering her a contract to write a book or some kind of PR thing. But no, he's the worst kind of asshole and he has no idea how to behave, especially towards women.
I hope he gets every nasty thing he deserves in every one of these trials. These judges CANNOT back down.
Journeyman
(15,036 posts)SomewhereInTheMiddle
(285 posts)I wonder if Trump will claim that now that he and the judge are in an adversarial state in the lawsuit that the judge must recuse himself from the criminal trial.
I would hope this would not succeed, not least because it would set precedent that anyone that wanted to force a judge out of a trial would simply need to sue them.
Anything to delay.
truthisfreedom
(23,150 posts)I can imagine he is quite scared. Too bad!
CaptainTruth
(6,598 posts)Trump is the biggest whining crybaby I've ever seen.
Trueblue1968
(17,231 posts)Evil
AntiChrist .... Demon
Maeve
(42,286 posts)dchill
(38,511 posts)... I expect him to fling shit like the spider monkeys at the zoo. You know - literally.
Maxheader
(4,373 posts)automobile financier gonna help with the lawyer bills?
bucolic_frolic
(43,236 posts)lakercub
(659 posts)There are reasons you CAN sue your judge but they are pretty specific. I found this article which talks about it. There are ways to get judges removed, censured, etc, but lawsuits are almost never the way and his lawyers should know that. There really should be punishment for this level of bad legal advice. If this is Trump's idea, his lawyers, if they had any ethics, should try and resign or drop their client (this close to the case that would be tough). If it was the their idea it should be grounds for punishment because a half-decent lawyer wouldn't even go down this path.
https://www.findlaw.com/litigation/filing-a-lawsuit/can-i-sue-a-judge-.html#:~:text=Most%20of%20the%20time%2C%20however,judicial%20officers%2C%20including%20court%20judges.
Excerpt:
That said, absolute immunity does not extend protection beyond judicial functions. Certain judicial acts can be so egregious that culpable judges could face some form of criminal or civil liability for their wrongdoings. You may be able to pay a filing fee to bring a civil action against a judge who:
Acts outside the scope of judicial functions
Commits misconduct that interferes with their judicial duties
Otherwise commits an illegal action that harms you or the public at large, or which is subject to a lower standard of qualified" immunity, as contrasted with absolute immunity
In addition, a prosecutor may be able to seek criminal charges against a judge for breaking the law.
For example, the United States Supreme Court restricted judicial immunity in a civil rights case where a woman, a subordinate court employee, sued a male judge for firing her based on her sex. The judge was found liable for violating the woman's civil rights. The Supreme Court found that the judge's action was an administrative function and not a judicial act, and therefore not protected by absolute immunity. The moral of this case is that if a judge acts outside the scope of their judicial function, you can sue.
Kennah
(14,290 posts)catnipcoffee
(16 posts)At what point does he get designated a vexatious litigant?
(Seriously, he's going to use every trick he can think of. When is enough, well, enough?)