News organizations press Biden and Trump to commit to debates
Source: NBC News
April 14, 2024, 7:00 AM EDT
A dozen national news organizations are calling on the presumptive presidential nominees to commit to debates ahead of the November election. In a joint statement Sunday, the news outlets pressed the candidates, without naming President Joe Biden or former President Donald Trump, to pledge their participation in the debates scheduled by the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates.
Though it is too early for invitations to be extended to any candidates, it is not too early for candidates who expect to meet the eligibility criteria to publicly state their support for and their intention to participate in the Commissions debates planned for this fall, the group of news organizations, including NBC News, said in a joint statement.
Biden and Trump have both won enough delegates to secure their nominations at the party conventions. The news outlets cited the exceptionally high stakes of the election, adding there is simply no substitute for the candidates debating with each other, and before the American people, their visions for the future of our nation.
In addition to NBC News, other signatories included ABC News, The Associated Press, CBS News, CNN, C-SPAN, Fox News, NewsNation, Noticias Univision, NPR, PBS NewsHour and USA Today.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/news-organizations-press-biden-trump-commit-debates-rcna147662
Blues Heron
(5,938 posts)Bad idea.
mucifer
(23,554 posts)absolutely looked horrible and unpresidential. But, there was nothing else he could do.
It would only lose him respect if he does that again.
There is no way debate monitors can handle trump.
Buzz Fledderjohn
(3 posts)You both get dirty and the pig likes it. This should be a hard no.
Ponietz
(2,987 posts)They knock over the pieces, shit on the board, then strut around like they won.
onetexan
(13,043 posts)all he could do is hurl accusations & insults. There's no need for POTUS to have to debate the bonafide moron. As the thread poster mentioned, you don't dignify him with a debate. The past 9 years we've had to suffer through the daily barrage of his insanity already so if ppl don't know his stupidity by now they shouldn't be voting.
...they just want the trump shitshow to keep stirring their pot...don't give it to them...
...of course, agree to the idea of debates, but never actually debate...
...no good could come of it...
Magoo48
(4,717 posts)No need to give the Orange Menace and his clowns of the apocalypse any press at all. The pressure is simply a grab for advertising dollars.
William Seger
(10,779 posts)No, that's impossible. Biden should refuse to debate, BUT he needs to make it crystal clear why it's a waste of time.
As in his last debate and all of his personal appearances, he will snort Adderall before going on stage, and be wired to the gills. And no doubt he will snort even more than usual.. .
I think Biden could push him over the edge pretty easy - Biden won't take Trump's crap at all, and he will throw zingers back at him, and Trump will fly off the handle. Trump cannot handle personal criticism at all, and Biden knows this.. If it happens on live TV that will be the final nail in Trump's campaign's coffin..
Lovie777
(12,283 posts)honor and abide by the rules.
Respect, honor and abide by the rules, and when has shithole done that?
tanyev
(42,573 posts)they have done that for years now. A republican says something outlandish and the reporter lets them get away with it by not pushing back or not asking follow up questions.
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Otherwise I'd love to see Biden debate Pumpkin head.
Novara
(5,844 posts)The motherfucker acts like a toddler on meth and the moderators won't control him. That's not a debate. It's a shitshow.
Biden needs to make a statement or a campaign ad that reminds people what a shitshow the last debate was, how the media refused to enforce the rules, and agree to debate only if they absolutely control the toddler. Put the onus BACK on the media. This reminds people that the media can't handle debates appropriately, reminds people what a toddler the motherfucker is, and reminds people what a shitshow the last one was. He was the only adult in the room.
If they could control the debate so it's actually a debate rather than a clown show, he'd likely be more than happy to do it, because he'd destroy the motherfucker. But the way the media is now, it isn't a debate. It's just sensationalism. It reinforces that politics is just a game for ratings and there's no substance.
dutch777
(3,027 posts)wnylib
(21,500 posts)and mute the mic when time is up.
That's the only way to do a "debate" with Trump, but he would never agree to it. He can't stand any restrictions of any kind on him.
I'm still not sure that those restrictions would work, though, so I'd say no, do not do any debates. Show excerpts from previous ones to make the reason clear.
gab13by13
(21,363 posts)Fuck the right wing MSM.
FalloutShelter
(11,871 posts)"I don't debate with rapist, traitors."
William Seger
(10,779 posts)All TFG wants is an opportunity to bring his lies to a larger audience, and you can be damned sure he would take full advantage.
LiberalFighter
(50,956 posts)gab13by13
(21,363 posts)If Trump were really ahead then he wouldn't want to debate.
President Biden wins by a landslide in a fair election.
SayItLoud
(1,702 posts)cheating in swing states.
tulipsandroses
(5,124 posts)Hes not a normal candidate. He has no plans to debate policy. He refused to debate in the Republican primary. Why didnt they push him to debate then?
EYESORE 9001
(25,949 posts)with court dates and bund rallies. Hard to prep for debates with all that going on. Perhaps hell be a convicted felon by the time all parties agree to terms.
everyonematters
(3,433 posts)I would not be surprised if there never is one.
70sEraVet
(3,504 posts)We have an incumbent President running against a former President. Everybody by now knows who they are and what they stand for. And everybody has already picked their side -- the election is just a matter of which side gets their people to the voting booth. And I don't think a debate is going to move that needle.
everyonematters
(3,433 posts)If the voters expect a debate, and they don't get one, who does that help- RFK jr. As a matter of fact, any notion of a debate helps RFK JR because of the expectations of the two majority candidates. That's my honest opinion. If they have a debate with or without him, it helps him. If he is not included, there are going to be people thinking why not. If he is included, it helps him with stature.
CousinIT
(9,247 posts)"NO, NO, NO, NO aaaand NO!"
"Get your profits and advertising dollars from elsewhere this time folks."
durablend
(7,462 posts)That's why they're pushing for it.
nowforever
(303 posts)Trump just lies continuously and has no basic knowledge of anything. No reason to give any kind of platform to a blathering imbecile.
bucolic_frolic
(43,197 posts)and release the video a week later. We don't need a circus.
PSPS
(13,603 posts)They would promote it like a WWF show, complete with a drum bed and a breathless voice talent telling us to "tune in and watch the fireworks!!111!!" Plus, it will have cheering sections!!11!11! DOn't miss it!!111!!1!!1!!
This is precisely how they do them these days.
The fact is that debates wouldn't change anyone's mind. It would just provide trump a platform to air his grievances ... again.
Mike Nelson
(9,960 posts)...not a good idea. Biden has to state he is willing. Trump has already said so, but that's a lie; he has not made up his mind, yet. I think Biden should just let Trump yell, which is what he will do... force the moderator(s) do do battle with Trump. It will make them look bad. Also, Sean Hannity should not be one of the moderators. I think he is experiencing some cognitive delay. He's starting to stumble over words. Hannity does self-correct, but who knows how fast or slow dementia will progress...
keopeli
(3,523 posts)they can get revenue. They want to stoke fear and trembling in liberals and anger in conservatives because it helps their bottom dollar. This is directed at Biden (since TSF wants a debate today, tomorrow, and every day). Biden is wise to condition his decision on TSF following the rules and acting like a human being and patriot, both of which are impossible. At the end of the day, Biden will debate when and where he pleases, knowing any debate will make TSF look like the lunatic that he is. No "pressure campaign" is necessary. But the MSM thinks it increases their credibility with a segment of the population.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)and the moderators do not keep tsf under control, Biden should just calmly state that he came to debate the serious issues that this country cares about, not to indulge tantrums of a toddler, drop his mic, and walk off.
SamKnause
(13,108 posts)They are not interested in having a debate.
They want a carnival show with the orange clown for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
It may not be good for America but it is good for the news organizations.
Bo Zarts
(25,399 posts)$$$
jaxexpat
(6,837 posts)"At one podium we have the current and incumbent president of the USA. At the other we have a guy who must win the election or go to prison."
brush
(53,794 posts)If you excited an insurrection against the government, you're automatically disqualified to participate in a presidential debate.
Hope22
(1,846 posts)There is nothing to gain for Biden. He can not expect a fair debate. We havent seen one in years. To say nothing of the press mopping up for TSF the morning after with at best, a both sides do it article. No!
sybylla
(8,515 posts)Debates and town halls are always so carefully managed to not piss off a candidate in case they get elected that no real information flows from them.
Also, no need to bother with a prime time debate when you can let all the courtroom coverage speak for itself.
CincyDem
(6,365 posts)Traurigkeit
(192 posts)JohnSJ
(92,251 posts)show.
The moderators of these debates have demonstrated they cannot control Trump to abide by any rules, and in fact will let him get away with anything. In addition, allowing an audience into these debates will only contribute to the circus atmosphere, with cheering and booing resembling a circus atmosphere.
Absolutely nothing will be gained from a debate.
Why give someone who tried to overthrow the U.S. government a platform, will only legitimize his lies.
Auggie
(31,174 posts)Dear_Prudence
(370 posts)However the debate goes, the press will catch any truth that emerges and then kill it with both-side-ism and 'what the latest poll says' drivel. If the debate featured TRump behind bars and Biden with the microphone kill-switch in hand, then maybe I'd support it.
dalton99a
(81,526 posts)and zero information content
SayItLoud
(1,702 posts)If Biden agrees to debate and demands enforced rules....The Slobfather will scream "it's rigged against me, so I'm not debating".
If Biden says " No debate" (for any of a myriad of reasons)....The Slobfather will scream "He's afraid to debate because (a myriad of lies)" The shitbag will ride that horse every day at every opportunity..." Slur) to debate me because....lie lie lie lie".
What should Biden don IMO.....Nothing, ignore the question, ....
What do you all think?
dalton99a
(81,526 posts)Debate after the trials
SayItLoud
(1,702 posts)"Explain, in detail how YOU the media that is demanding a debate WILL ENFORCE the rules of the debate. We want to see it in writing, then we will consider it...Oh, and only if the debate is on PBS". (fuck you greedy ratings seekers).
Then again...No debate.
tanyev
(42,573 posts)interjects, or starts spewing insults. Explain how they will drop camera feed or go to commercial if he starts wandering the stage. Everyone from moderator and producer up the chain to CEO needs to state that they fully support these actions, will not hesitate to use them and will not cave to Trump/Republican/MAGA outrage.
Basically, no debates because there is no network that would do this.
Qutzupalotl
(14,317 posts)Let him put his numbers against TSF. Let him explain his policies in detail. The contrast and clarity will be remarkable. It will put the lie to the narratives about age or senility. Remember the State of the Union? Remember what Joe did to Paul Ryan in 2012? Oh, now you're Jack Kennedy! Turned the race around,
I don't get why people here are reluctant for Joe to debate again. Yes, TSF talks too much and over people, but remember Will you shut up, man? That put him back on his heels for a minute. It also showed the audience exactly what TSF was doing chattering constantly with wild accusations and not letting anyone else speak.
The people deserve debates, now more than ever, while the media tries to manipulate them.
Y'all need to trust Joe. He's got this.
BeyondGeography
(39,375 posts)Biden is sane, rational and has zero to fear on substance. He also faces questions about his age which will be harped on endlessly if he is seen as dodging debates. The flip side is once people see and hear him those with an open mind will be assuaged and hell gain votes.
Also, lest we forget, Trump never really recovered from his frothing at the mouth performance in the first debate in 2020. Biden won because of moderate R ticket splitters many of whom were doubtless swayed by that performance alone. These are the same type of voters who are going to bring us to victory in November.
hay rick
(7,626 posts)MadMike47
(106 posts)The media can go shit in its collective hat.
onecaliberal
(32,865 posts)efhmc
(14,731 posts)Too busy.
FakeNoose
(32,656 posts)Let Biden lead from his strength ... his excellent record for the last 3.5 years.
Let Chump wallow in his flop-sweat. Don't give him any more free airtime than he's already getting.
The media is bending over backwards to help him. Why let this charade happen?
Don't forget the "debate" in 2020 when Chump screamed at Biden trying to expose him to Covid germs. Chump KNEW he had Covid and the entire family refused to be tested, but they went into the studio anyway. It was only 3 days after that debate that Chump had to be rushed to the hospital, and he was seriously ill.
Doodley
(9,095 posts)I would like to see Trump make a fool of himself. I would like to see Trump lost in a word salad of nonsense, hate, and repetition. I would like to see the contrast between Biden's positive vision for America and Trump who has no vision. Then I would like to see the polls that show 70% of viewers thought Biden won.
erodriguez
(656 posts)onecaliberal
(32,865 posts)Silent Type
(2,911 posts)Traurigkeit
(192 posts)Xoan
(25,321 posts)VeryProgressive
(27 posts)The "Press" doesn't want these debates because they truly believe it will inform the public. They want the debates for their own selfish reasons - to get ratings by virtue of theater. Trump won't abide by the rules of the debate, so I am of the belief that it will be pointless to engage in a debate. Of course, if they were set strict guidelines for how the debate is conducted and hold both parties to them.
Mawspam2
(732 posts)...and tried to kill Biden with his germs.
No debate(s).
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)You dont want to wrestle with a pig. Youll both get muddy and the pig will love it.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,627 posts)Joe should not debate Trump, no good can come of it.
oldsoftie
(12,558 posts)Trump will hijack it, the moderators wont do anything about it, the polls will say trump "looked tougher', etc etc.
NO
Traurigkeit
(192 posts)lastlib
(23,251 posts)Bad idea, to give TSF a platform with you.
modrepub
(3,496 posts)Yea, I bet the M$M wants dozens of debates. Ratings bonanza for them, a friggin sh-t show for the rest of us.
How about this, and I admit this is extremely mean. Attach the private parts of the moderator to a light shocking device. Every time tfg breaks a rule and the moderator doesn't take immediate corrective action they receive 3 seconds of light voltage to their private parts. If there are more than 5 violations during the debate, the voltage application time is doubled.
Hey, why not? This IMHO would be a ratings bonanza for the networks. Hell, let all of them (even the right-wing ones) try this format with their most popular on-air personality. Ratings are all the M$M really wants and this format would certainly provide it. Substance is way overrated anyway, right?
Rebl2
(13,528 posts)not let the media dictate when they should debate. It should be the candidates decision, not media.
Raven123
(4,851 posts)Get credible moderators who actually know stuff
ancianita
(36,109 posts)Trump would just use even one debate as another pretext to file delay motions.
Biden's too busy governing this democracy to stoop to conquer.
nakocal
(552 posts)stage left
(2,962 posts)have to share the stage with a traitor?
NoMoreRepugs
(9,436 posts)Biophilic
(3,666 posts)The MSM doesnt deserve to have a debate. They are carnival barkers trying to fleece the suckers from as much of their money as possible. They have long since lost the privilege of being supporters of democracy and of America.
Aussie105
(5,405 posts)"And in one corner ladiez and gentz, we have empathy, logic, intelligence and good governance!
In the other corner, we have a total raving nutter who will badger, insult and threaten.
Who will win this fight?
Tune in! "
(Advertising revenue in this time slot will be cranked up to warp factor 10.)
Pointless challenge is pointless.
keithbvadu2
(36,829 posts)PortTack
(32,778 posts)Hekate
(90,719 posts)Actually, if it were up to me, Id say Hell No.
NanaCat
(1,178 posts)It's four bloody months until we even have official nominees. Why even bring this up now, you stupid, greedy media traitors?
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)The M$M use these debates as a huge ad revenue payday. It has NOTHING to do with our Democracy - its all about the almighty dollar.