House votes to prohibit DHS money from funding Mayorkas salary
Source: The Hill
06/26/24 7:04 PM ET
House Republicans on Wednesday approved a measure that would prohibit money for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from funding the salary of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, the latest example of GOP lawmakers targeting the embattled Cabinet head.
The House cleared an amendment led by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) to the DHS appropriations bill for fiscal 2025 that would prevent funding allocated in the legislation from being used to pay Mayorkass salary.
The DHS appropriations bill, to be sure, has no chance of becoming law in its current form including with the Mayorkas amendment amid opposition from Senate Democrats and the White House. Republicans have nonetheless sought to include their priorities in the legislation to put themselves on stronger footing for government funding negotiations with the Senate down the road.
The push to slash Mayorkass salary comes after the House voted to impeach the DHS secretary in February, making him the first Cabinet official to be penalized since the 1870s. The Senate then dismissed the pair of articles in April. The vote on Biggss Mayorkas amendment was largely along party lines, 193-173, with 72 lawmakers not voting. Just one Republican Puerto Rico Resident Commissioner Jenniffer González-Colón voted no.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/4742179-house-dhs-money-alejandro-mayorkas-salary/
bucolic_frolic
(45,824 posts)Is this really a precedent they want to set? Not just with characters under Trump, but I remember when Doonesbury devoted strips to just reading the names of the Reagan Administration indicted. It took days...
AllaN01Bear
(22,410 posts)2naSalit
(90,884 posts)That they are peacocks with beautiful plumage to display regularly but it's actually them showing us their over-active anal sphincters and how much they can produce each moment of each day.
wolfie001
(3,079 posts)2naSalit
(90,884 posts)She and hubby form a pair known as lips and gums.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,119 posts)GreenWave
(8,491 posts)thenelm1
(907 posts)compromise, shouldn't they be refusing to accept their paychecks as well? (Like that would ever happen.)
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Blue Idaho This message was self-deleted by its author.
Botany
(71,805 posts)Johnson had a chance to do something about the border but shut that down @ the
request of Trump. They want the the border to be a mess.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,145 posts)question everything
(48,460 posts)DiverDave
(4,936 posts)To say this very thing
AllaN01Bear
(22,410 posts)Martin68
(24,058 posts)KPN
(15,970 posts)fascist right-wingnut Republican Party. We had better win big in November or this is what we have to look forward to for way too many years to come. And if we do win big, we damn well better take it to them on multiple fronts: Citizens United, SCOTUS corruption, Fairness Doctrine, a return to enforcement of anti-trust laws and real competition (between big money and little money!), the Electoral College, hell -- an amendment to fix the imbalance of 2 Senators per State, the list goes on ... and we damn well better take it to them hard!
Eyeball_Kid
(7,545 posts)all GOPers must be voted out. Trump insists that ALL GOPers show complete loyalty. That means that all GOPers must toe the line. And any who won't will be cast aside and punished. All GOPers are mini-Trumps. All of them. Trump demands unanimity and complete loyalty. A vote for ANY GOPer means a vote for Trump. They've diminished themselves completely to the service of Trump, who makes the election choices incredibly easy. No matter what they say, GOPers MUST do Trump's bidding. They are an extension of Trump. All of them.
Dorn
(550 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,955 posts)It's punishment after he has already served in that position. The government getting free labor.
It's like me being a new hire working for Walmart for 2 weeks. They claim to pay only after 2 weeks. And when my paycheck is due, they say never mind we won't pay you. Isn't that a labor violation?
Hmmm also sounds like an ex post facto law. You did not perform as we wanted you to, despite not telling you it woul be a cut in your pay. So now we are cutting your pay because you didn't do as the House, Biggs in particular, wanted you to do.
LymphocyteLover
(6,237 posts)marmar
(77,798 posts)oasis
(51,298 posts)in federal prison right now campaigning for a better dinner menu.
ZonkerHarris
(25,039 posts)peppertree
(22,587 posts)They feel governance should be their exclusive province, and that of their toadies' - and that only they should meddle in such things.
AllaN01Bear
(22,410 posts)AllaN01Bear
(22,410 posts)peppertree
(22,587 posts)"I have another superyacht to worry about."
AllaN01Bear
(22,410 posts)jls4561
(1,407 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(112,792 posts)AZ8theist
(6,135 posts)He was co-chair of the team plotting the terrorist attack on January 6th.
Katcat
(325 posts)Same to all gop congresspeople?