US blocks UN telecom treaty
Source: AP
Countries like China and Iran sought increased controls of cyberspace
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) A disappointed American delegation led a Western snub of a U.N. telecommunications treaty Thursday after rivals, including Iran and China, won support for provisions interpreted as endorsing greater government control of the Internet.
The unraveling of the conference displayed the deep ideological divide at the 193-nation gathering in Dubai, where envoys grappled with the first revisions of global telecom codes since 1988 years before the dawn of the Internet age.
A Western bloc led by a powerhouse U.S. delegation sought to stop any U.N. rules on cyberspace, fearing they could squeeze Web commerce and open the door for more restrictions and monitoring by authoritarian regimes that already impose wide-ranging clampdowns. The head of one tech industry group said it could forever alter the Web.
A rival group including China, Russia, Gulf Arab states, African nations and others favored U.N. backing for stronger government sway over Internet affairs and claimed the Western dominance of the Internet needed to be addressed.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/us_blocks_un_telecom_treaty/
freshwest
(53,661 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)And were some of the other countries (not meaning Iran, UAE, China, etc.) trying to protect their business from the western model? We're not all that free with all the copyright restrictions they have in place. Is this a battle of political or economic fatctors? Which one is more suppressive to freedom of speech? I'm not sure why these guys all have to meet in Dubai, either..
hack89
(39,171 posts)it is about authoritarian governments wanting the ability to restrict what information their people can access.
The line was pretty stark - there were no democracies advocating for these changes.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)It's not a union as we understand it, is it, more of an association?
Sorry, I'm not up to speed on this. Some regard the USA to be the eternal bad guys on freedom of speech, ala Wikileaks, Assange, Manning, etc. I don't agree with that.
I agree that we should not go along with this. But in a world that is connected, how do we bypass what the true authoritarian regimes are doing?
And if we inadvertently connect to something that is on their grid, can they get our information to sell? There have already been instances where Chinese or Russian websites pop up in searches and if you don't have your security set to block them, they get into your computer.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)This is a good thing and the UN is wrong in pushing for this sham.
ZM90
(706 posts)No internet censorship!
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)We shouldn't endorse this kind of censorship.
forward4freedom
(18 posts)ZM90
(706 posts)and that soon he drops such threats to the net like TPP for example.
OnlinePoker
(5,725 posts)Canada's Conservative government were also against it and they are pretty far right-wing.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)They are so glacial in speed it makes this republican house term seem productive.
Uncle Joe
(58,405 posts)Thanks for the thread, DonViejo.