Fox hires Dennis Kucinich as analyst
Source: Associated Press
NEW YORK (AP) Former Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich has signed on as a regular contributor to Fox News Channel.
The former Ohio congressman unsuccessfully ran for president in 2004 and 2008, and recently ended his congressional career. Fox said Wednesday that Kucinich will make his debut in his new role on "The O'Reilly Factor" on Thursday night.
Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes said he's always been impressed with Kucinich's fearlessness and thoughtfulness on the issues.
Kucinich, who was elected mayor of Cleveland at age 31, said Fox has always provided him with a chance to offer his perspective.
Read more: http://newsok.com/fox-hires-dennis-kucinich-as-analyst/article/feed/487925
glinda
(14,807 posts)Renew Deal
(81,858 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)him, too, because they're like a borg that thinks alike, doncha know!!!"
He must need money, but damn--there are better ways short of soul-selling and prostitution to get a bit of cash. How anyone could take a paycheck from that craven Murdoch is beyond me--it's a complete abrogation of one's integrity, IMO.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)also a good possibility that Kucinich might give some real news to those Republicans who
listen to or read Fox News only, and expose them to what's actually happening in the
world for the first time.
MADem
(135,425 posts)heard. And he voted with the GOP more often than most Democrats (so far left he's right?). Why wouldn't he go work for the King of All Wingnuts, Rupert the Sleazy? He needs money, and he can grind his axe while taking that cash from Murdoch.
Now that he's no longer a perennial candidate, he can go back to his anti-choice ways, too, if he'd like.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)I think you are thinking of Lieberman,
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)when asked by his supporters who he felt they should support, he replied "Obama".
That seems nice.
MADem
(135,425 posts)LoisB
(7,206 posts)Renew Deal
(81,858 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)when he was mayor didn't frighten him away from what he was doing. He continued his
fight against gangsters.
brush
(53,776 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)Kucinich has to do is to tell the truth. In this sense, any Dem. can out-debate any Repub.
He is worse than Rendell -- and always has been. Just an attention whore with few real principles. Not that different from extreme right wingers -- so now he has found his true home...
Okay then.
alp227
(32,023 posts)Renew Deal
(81,858 posts)Turns out it's Kucinich that is a joke. He's now a tool of the war machine and a sellout. Some would argue that he sold out ages ago.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20130116/us-tv-fox-kucinich
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Him criticizing Obama's foreign policy in front of ignorant assholes will make Obama go to war more often?
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)peace frog
(5,609 posts)Give 'em hell, Dennis!
tblue
(16,350 posts)I don't mind it. Let's see how it pans out.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)and his anti-Obama stance. I'm beginning to believe DK has always been a Republican in heart and soul, and only played it as if he were a Liberal.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The view, which he had held for decades, was incompatible with a national presidential campaign.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)of the Cleveland City Council from an area that was heavily ethnic and anti-Black. Kucinich led the Council's opposition to Mayor Carl B Stokes, the nation's first Black Mayor of a major city. I think we'd refer to the then Dennis as a blue-dog Dem. The stint at FOX just means he's gone back to his roots. BTW, the movie "The Deer Hunter" was filmed in Kucinich's ward.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Please tell me this is a joke.
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)I believe Rand Paul was the original sponsor of this piece of legislation protecting the NRA's FOREIGN gun markets:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022193033
cali
(114,904 posts)If this is your standard for courage, heaven help you.
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)are assumptions, nothing more than that.
Bumblebee
(3,446 posts)Then we are in trouble. Fortunately he ain't that.
MADem
(135,425 posts)funds!
And now, he's one of the best sellouts, working for one of the best heartless, soulless bastards in the known universe.
Cognitive dissonance--'tis hard on some folk.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)Though it is true that whatever is said in either case, may or may not be true about its respective subject, DK or PO, I just wanted to point this comparison out, because I, unlike what calls itself "the Left, am willing to admit the possibility of my own errors, about DK or anyone else.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)in the House. Only 32 of 200 Dems had a worse voting record than he did in the 112th Congress.
former9thward
(32,004 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)former9thward
(32,004 posts)Your link shows he voted with the party 88% of the time. Nobody voted 100% and even Boehner voted his party 91%. Most Democrats were just a few percent higher in the low 90s. That's why this is BS. What the "party" votes are is not said. Usually most votes in Congress are more complicated than just a "party" vote. Are we to believe that Boehner who is the leader of his party voted against his party 1 out of every 10 times?
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Dennis Kucinich is near the bottom in votes with the Democratic party. I say again: he was one of the GOP's most reliable votes from the other side. There are even Blue Dogs who had a better voting record than he did. Most of the Progressive Caucus had a better record.
He was a constant critic of Democrats, got almost nothing of note done during his tenure in Congress, and preferred to throw the baby out with the bathwater when he didn't get his way exactly how he wanted it.
Ted Kennedy managed to be a great liberal and a fighter for liberal causes, while at the same time get shit done.
Dennis can now get paid for his bashing of Democrats and he gets to do it in front of a camera with an audience. I don't doubt he's very excited.
former9thward
(32,004 posts)Party unity being defined as when a majority of Democrats oppose a majority of Republicans. I knew your chart was BS.
http://innovation2.cq.com/media/2011/votestudy_2011/
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)As I said, he was a constant critic of Democrats and his record sucks. He did almost nothing of note during his tenture in Congress besides grandstanding to get his mug on TV. He was not an asset for any liberal or progressive who actually wanted to accomplish anything.
You can deny the above facts all you want, but his most recent action belies your spin.
"Through 16 years in Congress and two presidential campaigns, FOX News has always provided me with an opportunity to share my perspective with its enormous viewership. I look forward to a continuation of our relationship this time as a FOX News contributor."
--Dennis Kucinich, FOX News Employee
cyclezealot
(4,802 posts)I doubt Kucinich will stay long. He's too much a proponent of media diversity. Re drones, a president's right to kill Americans without judicial OK. . Obama deserves a little criticism. Kucinich may befriend an occasional Republican. But, he hardly ever votes their way.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)for a paycheck.
Maybe he needs the money.
cyclezealot
(4,802 posts)doubtful. I"ve heard Kucinich speak on the O'Reilly factor before. Kucinich has a way to not offend. I think its his spiritual beliefs. When he spoke before O'Reilly before he made his case without selling out. Time will tell....I predict should Fox news not allow him to lay out his views as he'd like , he'll resign on his own. ?
Should he take on the Neo Cons on their own turf, this could be a good thing.?
Enrique
(27,461 posts)will realize they are progressives after hearing Dennis on a regular basis.
Bumblebee
(3,446 posts)He is an opportunist. Always has been.
colorado_ufo
(5,734 posts)Satan was seen strapping on his ice skates.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Pryderi
(6,772 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)There, I fixed it. He'll be just like Alan Colmes and Kirsten Powers.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Dennis is all about Dennis.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,735 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)I know you have to eat but this is beyond reason. You strive for perfection and if it misses by a millimeter you *hit in the punch bowl. I really have tired of that.
cyclezealot
(4,802 posts)As his political action fund. You think Fox approves ?
peace13
(11,076 posts)I actually contributed to his campaigns!
valerief
(53,235 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Hannity does it all the time.
BlueNoteSpecial
(141 posts)....opportunity knocks but once....and don't come back no more.... So grab it in the night, grab it in the day, grab it right now or it will get away....you better snatch and grab it....snatch and grab it....you better snatch and grab it baby 'fore it gets awaaaaaaaaay....
patrice
(47,992 posts)has what it takes to bring it and even if he does, more or less successfully, do so, he's still just their little token "Liberal".
He will be allowed to say, what they want him to say. He doesn't have the real ability to draw blood and if he perchance did somehow, he'll be fired after FOX makes an adequate display of their intellectual magnanimmity.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Read it and weep. Only 32 of 200 Democrats voted with Republicans more often than Kucinich did in the last Congress. Even among the Progressive Caucus, he was near the bottom.
His record was even worse in previous Congresses.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Alex Jones' guest in 2008. Ron Paul was the mainstay then, and some might be surprised who he's had on the air. He and Paul felt oppressed by their parties.
He's retired now and decided to stay out of office. A lot more money to be made at propaganda central. He'll corral the liberals into watching conservatives and believe Fox is fair and balanced.
Just like Infowars with their 'both parties are the same.' Except the Tea Party and Libertarian, they are much better, just so long as you don't look at the Koch bros money funding the stuff.
Don't look, keep the magic going...
bvar22
(39,909 posts)That is about the only thing that will get me to tune in to Fox.
I will wait for the evidence before forming my opinion.
Anyone who thinks that Kucinich will be another Alan Colmes does not know DK.
I was expecting a response out of the ordinary from Dennis after the repeated shaftings from the Democratic Party, but going to FOX was not something that was on my radar.
He is a STAND UP spokesman and representative for traditional Liberal Democratic Party Values,
and an outspoken thorn in the sides of the DLC "Centrists" who were frequently embarrassed by DK stand on Liberal values.
[font color=firebrick][center]Unlike the other candidates, I am not funded by those corporate interests.
I owe them no loyalty, and they have no influence over me or my policies.
---Dennis Kucinich [/font]
[/center]
MADem
(135,425 posts)corporations. So he does owe them his loyalty, and they will influence him--because if his performance doesn't meet their standards, they will fire his ass.
In bed with Murdoch--who knew?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)..oppose private citizens making a living.
I think that using Rupert's money to spread the words and values of FDR, LBJ, and Wellstone is a WIN/WIN,
and wouldn't hesitate to get on THAT Gravy Train myself.
I can't think of a better use for Old Rupert's money.
Anyone who thinks that private citizen Dennis Kucinich is NOW going to suddenly change and start supporting Conservative Values like Mandatory Health Insurance from For Profit Corporations and More Anti-LABOR Free Trade is suffering from delusions.
[font color=firebrick][center]"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone [/font][/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center][/font]
MADem
(135,425 posts)compromising bastards" card so very often throughout his self-absorbed career. Of course, when he changed his positions it was because he "rethought"--if anyone else bowed to political reality, they were "caving."
He's a hypocrite. He never worked well with the delegation, either. A difficult man who accomplished little, save garnering attention for himself.
I have enough to get by--I have standards, and I wouldn't go work for Faux. I guess the speaker's circuit is too much work, and that very fat Congressional pension (he's old enough to collect it IN FULL) isn't enough to live the good life?
I hope the soul selling goes well for him, though--he can't go any lower.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...who didn't work well with the conservative "Centrist" delegation.
Like me, he has a stubborn streak when it comes to the traditional Democratic Working Class Values of FDR/LBJ, and the direction of the Democratic Party.
As the Democratic party swung farther and farther to the conservative Right, Dennis stood his Democratic ground. He wasn't afraid to call out those who capitulated to Republican demands or sold out to Wall Street and Corporate America.
For THAT, he won MY respect.
Far THAT, he receives your hatred.
We're not very much alike.
MADem
(135,425 posts)"blind, slobbering adoration" or "lockstep loyalty?" I don't do that because that's getting personal, ascribing motives not in evidence, and it's rude.
See how that works? There's no need to get personal and shitty. Your little dig reflects more on you than me. And on that score, no, we're not very much alike at all, I'd say. I can have an adult conversation, replete with differences, without characterizing your motives in a petty and childish fashion.
I don't "hate" the man, I simply think he is an opportunist and a sell-out. It takes caring to hate, and anyone who would flush their reputation, such as it is, for a Murdoch paycheck has enough personal problems without my emotional input. I'd also venture to say that if becoming "more of a Democrat" means taking a check from an agency that never let the truth get in the way of a good story, a place that prioritizes low cut blouses and a bimbo culture over facts and analysis, well, I'd prefer to not be "more" of that kind of a Democrat. That crew, let's remember, calls the Quisling Dick Morris one of their "Democrats" as well.
If you choose to buy what they sell, that's on you. I'll eschew their wares.
Indykatie
(3,696 posts)Some actually saw him as a credible candidate for president. Kucinich is not the face of a liberal Democrat that I would entrust to advocate liberal positions and let's face it he won't change many Fox viewers minds and Fox knows that or they wouldn't have hired him.
MADem
(135,425 posts)him up as the Authoritative Voice of the Democratic Party (which they'll likely call "The DemocRAT Party, snicker, snicker, snort, yuck!" .
He'll probably get the same make-up artist that they gave Colmes--greasy hair mussed and dyed far too dark, pan stick makeup sickly coffin-white, clothes a bit rumpled and ill-fitting....it's like a Passion Play with those guys; they appeal to the lowest common denominator. He'll be the wrestler the crowd loves to boo in the Faux Snooze Big Time Wrestling Ring. And we know how that wrestling stuff is fixed...!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Murdoch's brilliant strategy! Brilliant!!!!
"Anyone who thinks that Kucinich will be another Alan Colmes does not know DK."
Why is he getting paid more?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I also tune in when Bill Clinton appears on O'Reilly's Fox Show.
...and you KNOW I'm not a big fan of old DLC Bill,
but I like to stay informed.
I'm really glad Rupert will be spending his money to give a platform to a Liberal Democrat.
I can't understand the opposition that some DUers have to a consistent and stalwart Liberal Democrat's voice on O'Reilly's show.
[font color=firebrick][center]The Democratic Party is a BIG TENT, but there is NO ROOM for those
who advance the agenda of THE RICH (Corporate Owners) at the EXPENSE of LABOR and the POOR. [/font][/center]
tblue37
(65,342 posts)did the liberal cause a lot of good when he appeared regularly on FOX. Diehard Teabagger types won't change, obviously, but some Republicans are just ill-informed and inclined to continue to trust and stay with the same party they have always identified with--and in many cases that connection was established when they were kids, simply because everyone around them was a member of the same party. I have a lot of relatives, otherwise wonderful people, who have always been Republicans and who watch FOX and have their worldview deformed by it because they never get any better information.
My father was a career Air Force man. He was at Pearl Harbor when it was bombed. His whole Sicilian immigrant family is super committed to patriotism, and there's a strong tradition of military service in the family. In fact, I was the first of his kids who didn't join the military!
For people like my relatives, hearing the liberal argument presented by a highly respected general with decades of honored service to his name undoubtedly helped to counter some of the BS they were hearing 24/7 from everyone else on FOX. I am sure that most FOX viewers remained unmoved, but I bet at least a few were influenced by Clark when he was a regular FOX contributor. Some here on DU called him a fool or a traitor for appearing on FOX, but I thought he was helping the liberal cause.
Kucinich won't have Clark's military backgroundd to help him win a modicum of respect from those viewers inclined that way, but he is a staunch, well-spoken liberal, and I cannot imagine Kucinich rolling over or playing doormat with wishy-washy arguments for his liberal views the way most of FOX's token liberals do.
I imagine that for most FOX viewers he will just reinforce their prejudice against what they consider "extreme" leftwing views. But those few who are FOX-viewing Republicans from long habit and circumstance, rather than from inherent nastiness, might be enlightened, at least a bit, when they hear someone speak intelligently and with sincere conviction about beliefs that they have only ever heard presented in the most outrageously false ways by people like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity, et al.
cyclezealot
(4,802 posts)He's been on the O'Reilly show many times. Each time I've seen him before O'Reilly he did not back down from his ideals.. Quite the opposite.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)I question his integrity since he's going to be on the Murdoch payroll.
The proof in the pudding will be if he bashes his fellow dems.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)not if
Politicub
(12,165 posts)I'll admit I never was a big fan of his.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Ha!
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)lolz
Remember how shocked certain folks were to learn that HuffPo was really HuffHo? Yeah, I reckon it's these same folks whose heads are exploding right now.
Julie
dogman
(6,073 posts)Wes Clark went into the lion's den, but I don't think their viewers are capable of enlightenment. I hope he has integrity.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)fair weather folk
Dennis, but it's hard to have any respect for this decision of his.
frylock
(34,825 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)and very large tires ...
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)Why on earth would Kucinich do this? At best he's going to be the token liberal who always gets shouted down, at worst they're going to trot him out as an example of a Democrat who constantly disagrees with the President.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)He will suit their needs perfectly. I am not surprised. Well, yes, I am a little surprised.
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Response to swag (Original post)
madrchsod This message was self-deleted by its author.
judesedit
(4,438 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)No judgements here. Lets see what we shall see. Now Fox has both Dennis and Joe Trippi.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)brentspeak
(18,290 posts)Ups Fox's ratings:
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022202491
Still, I could see how Kucinich going to Fox Noise wins it instant credibility with you.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)questions posed by Washington Post, USA Today, and McClatchy Newspaper reporters:
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/smartpolitics/2013/01/fox_still_shunned_at_obama_pre.php
Outlets Selected for Questions at President Obama News Conferences, 2009-2013
...
Rank: 9 - Fox News (#questions: 14)
Rank: 10 - Washington Post (#questions: 11)
Rank: 11 - USA Today (#questions: 9)
...
Rank: 13 (tie) - McClatchy (5)
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Murdoch's writing Kucinich's checks.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)He, by answering Fox News reporters' questions more than he does the Washington Post and USA Today; you, by laughably linking to "facts" which actually say the opposite of what you intended to say.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Maybe you should too.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)[font size=4]Bvar's Postulate[/font]
The first person to use in a discussion thread is not really laughing,
but has, in effect, made a public admission that they are no longer able to cogently defend their position,
and are desperately clinging to the absurd misconception that no one will be able to see through their pathetic attempt to Save Face.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)After all, they've already won you over:
"That is about the only thing that will get me to tune in to Fox. "
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=371006
Brilliant Murdoch move.
Wait for it....
bvar22
(39,909 posts)You just saw your entire argument shot down in flames,
but you want us to believe you're laughing.
.
.
.
.
Yep. I believe that.
.
.
.
Un Hunh
.
.
Well now I'm laughing too,
at the transparent desperation.
Cheers!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Is Murdoch his boss?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...so what IS your point?
I'm increasingly surprised at the number of DUers who oppose private citizens working for a living.
If Dennis starts suddenly pushing for Conservative Republican values like Mandatory Health Insurance from For Profit Corporations,
or MORE Free Trade,
or Drone Bombings,
or more extra-Constuitutional power for the "Unitary Executive",
I'll be the first to express my disappointment.
I can't think of a better way to spend old Rupert's money than to have someone standing UP for the Liberal values I still support.
[font color=firebrick][center]"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone [/font][/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center][/font]
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I'm increasingly surprised at the number of DUers who oppose private citizens working for a living. "
Are you defending Fox?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...which is no surprise considering the origin.
I'm not "defending" anything.
Are you attacking me for supporting a private citizen's right to work for a living,
or to appear on Fox?
If DK suddenly starts pushing Conservative Policies,
I will be the first to attack him,
but, as I stated above, I'm not going to be pulled into a Knee Jerk judgement,
unlike some here.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Damn, are you that desperate?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Bill Clinton IS a private citizen, and makes a lot of money through public appearances.
Do you KNOW whether he was paid for his appearance?
I really don't care either way,
because I have no problem with private citizens being fairly compensated for their time...but apparently you do.
Why don't you explain that objection to us.
I LIKE the idea of Rupert's money financing a Liberal voice on his network.
Hey.
What happened to the cartoon smilies?
..No longer laughing, are you?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Do you KNOW whether he was paid for his appearance?"
It was a fucking interview!
because I have no problem with private citizens being fairly compensated for their time...but apparently you do.
Why don't you explain that objection to us.
I LIKE the idea of Rupert's money financing a Liberal voice on his network.
Yup, it's desperation. I'm sure you're OK with lobbyists and the like. After all, they've got to eat.
Oh brother.
Dennis Kucinich Cashes In With FoxNews
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/16/1179544/-Kucinich-Cashes-In-With-FoxNews
bvar22
(39,909 posts)It is routine for networks to pay people for appearing on their shows,
especially if they are guaranteed Ratings Boosters.
O'Reilly's show is organized under the Entertainment/Commentary division at Fox, not the "News" division.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Old Dog picked up a check for his time.
I don't really care either way.
I mentioned above that I am in favor of Private Citizens being fairly compensated for their time & effort.
YOU are the one having a problem with it,
but so far have not been able to logically explain your attacks.
Just stamping you foot and insisting that, somehow, magically,
it is different when Bill Clinton does it is not a logically sound argument.
Cheers!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)it's interesting that you're trying to justify Fox by comparing Kucinich to Bill Clinton, you know, the DLC guy.
Damn!
rational_pi
(23 posts)I am also baffled by this over reaction! It is possible that Fox news may be trying to get some credibility. It may turn out that,
(1) DK will just be the token Liberal whipping boy.
(2) DK turns into just another Faux news conservative talking head,
(3) DK will be allowed to express his opinion openly and he becomes an effective Liberal voice for that outfit,
(4) DK may find that he is being used or is forced to follow an script and flip his middle fnger to Faux and quit.
It seems most here are already convinced of (1) and/or (2).
Why don't we wait and see?
Politicub
(12,165 posts)If you can't see the difference then I can't help you.
But the proof will be in the substance of his views.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)When's the DoJ going to investigate News Corp phone hacking?
Ah, that only happens in other countries.
Fun Fact: Viet Dinh, the author of the USA PATRIOT Act, is on News Corp's board of directors.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Cha
(297,210 posts)Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama.. it's all Obama fault! Obama made Dennis do it.
Yes - Obama's fault!
Still Sensible
(2,870 posts)One, the positions he takes will often be the most liberal... nothing wrong with that on its face, but it will give Fox what they will portray as a far left contrast to their "reasonable" (read neanderthal, racist, right wing knuckle dragging) viewers... whose numbers, by the way, seem to be declining, but they're so damn brainwashed. They wil try and portray his solid liberal viewpoint as both "way out there" and "mainstream democrat" at the same time.
And, two, it gives them someone who can level severe criticism from the left to aid Fox in the right's divide and conquer quest.
I am sure that DK will often have terrific perspectives and great analysis. But make no mistake, he will be used by the evil Fox empire.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I cannot say I am shocked, but I am certainly disappointed.
and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)And I hope they do not intend to belittle and mock him at his expense. They are ruthless and cruel ideological propagandists.
otohara
(24,135 posts)Blood money ... Get ready for daily abuse from your new co workers
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)you couldn't pay me to go on ever again. There is no soap in the universe that will get the stench out.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Dennis,hold out for Al-Jazeera...you should know that is BLOOD MONEY!
and as far as this quote:
"Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes said he's always been impressed with Kucinich's fearlessness and thoughtfulness on the issues. "
The translation is "he is a useful idiot that I can use to destroy the left!"
ballaratocker
(126 posts)He will be a liberal milquetoast who comes on to criticize Democrats. It's very disappointing.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Rather than have on a Democrat who is an Obama supporter they will have on a Democrat who is a solid left-wing critic of the president, to fan the flames of disunity in the Democratic Party.
That's the plan.
aandegoons
(473 posts)Or they just may be trying to upset their already shrinking viewership to try and stem bleeding artery. Either way I doubt it will bring any of us extremist lefties to the table. I will continue to boycott them and any business that supports them.
stultusporcos
(327 posts)on another channel.
Working in the enemy's camp to undermind them could have big payoffs in the end.
Yes when PBO acts like a pub he needs to be called on it too and I don't not care either why because it would be truthful and cheerleading is worthless and does not help the country at all.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,735 posts)More likely he'll confirm their belief that Democrats are a bunch of crazies.
stultusporcos
(327 posts)Personally I have nothing to do with all things Republican but Dennis decided to take a different path so maybe he will have some luck maybe not. It is his choice so I am sure he has an idea as to what he is doing.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)"Through 16 years in Congress and two presidential campaigns, FOX News has always provided me with an opportunity to share my perspective with its enormous viewership. I look forward to a continuation of our relationship this time as a FOX News contributor."
Yeah I'm sure he's going to stick it to the people writing his paycheck!
stultusporcos
(327 posts)keep it simple
Duval
(4,280 posts)I've always thought of Kucinich as one of the most honest politicians and as a true patriot. It is ok to disagree with some of our President's policies, but to turn to Fox's "hate venue" is not Kucinich. I hope he makes a much needed contribution to Truth. Still, I can hardly believe this.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)entire career.
Exen Trik
(103 posts)I'm sure Fox sees him as someone who can either be ridiculed as a liberal or used as a critic of Obama, or perhaps both at once. But how it'll play out? If he can just promote some honest, healthy, informed populism among the fox news crowd I think the country as a whole will be better for it. Even if its basically presented as anti-Obama, a push from the right and left on mutually important issues could do wonders for our public discourse.
I'm willing to bet that's the angle he has in mind too.
But as I said, we'll see how it goes...
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... asked them if they knew what they were doing? Maybe Ailes thinks he can drag some democrats over to watch Fox News, since they have hired Dennis? I love Dennis Kucinich, but I will never watch Fox news in order to get a glimpse of him. I salute him for doing this...literally entering the lions den to speak truth to money (oops, I mean power). They will try to chew him up and spit him out, but he will turn the tables on them and leave them wondering what the Hell happened. Dennis has the power of his convictions,
and no one, not even Fox News, can conquer it. I salute Dennis Kucinich!
IronicNews
(129 posts)Also, viewership on right wing networks plummeted after the election so being the good capitalists they are, Fox, probably did this to gain viewers. I kind of what to see what he has to say...
kairos12
(12,860 posts)He will be that rat like creature next to Jabba the Ailes on Storm Trooper News.
triplepoint
(431 posts)Way to go Dennis! You're our Mole there now!
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Apparently DU is full of geniuses who know exactly what Kucinich will say, including the extent to which he'll present genuine progressive positions and the extent to which he'll be manipulated by Fox just to make Obama look bad.
Hey, geniuses, could I have your picks for the NFL playoffs this weekend?
I side with the rational voices, such as cyclezealot in #62 ("I'll watch first, criticize later" and Exen Trik in #92 ("I'll reserve jugement until I see how it plays out" .
My personal prediction is that, yes, he'll criticize Obama, but he'll also criticize plenty of RWers, and will at least let a little fresh air into the hermetically sealed Fox bubble.
You might also consider that criticism from the left can help Obama. On health care, for example, the ACA looks moderate and centrist if you consider it as a compromise between the right (an unregulated free market) and the left (single payer). I'm sure many Fox viewers don't even realize that there's anything to the left of the ACA.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)express their utter contempt for anything, or anyone, of the Liberal ilk. A feeding frenzy of sorts, except that the only blood in the water is of their own making, to satisfy their own ends. On the reality side, I seriously doubt that Dennis will sacrifice any of his beliefs for Fox, any more than Michael Steele has on MSNBC. Third wayers hate Kucinich speaks the truth, even when it is inconvenient for them, and for that he endures their full wrath. It is kind of fun to watch them scramble over each other to peddle their wares though, rec, +1, Huge K&R, 'you know Kucinich used to be pro-life', yadda, yadda, yadda.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)You mean like getting paid by Murdoch?
It's pretty hilarious that you're criticizing people for not being on board with Kucinich joining Fox.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)If you hate Liberals, just say so and state your reasons...it's your right. This 'round-about' kabuki our 3rd wayers constantly use to express their dislike of the Liberal class without actually having to come out and directly say it smacks as a bit ridiculous to me. That's all.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"If you hate Liberals, just say so and state your reasons...it's your right. "
...Fox Noise is for "liberals"?
"This 'round-about' kabuki our 3rd wayers constantly use to express their dislike of the Liberal class without actually having to come out and directly say it smacks as a bit ridiculous to me."
You know what "smacks as a bit ridiculous": that piece of drivel above.
Are you going to watch Fox Noise now that Kucinich has been hired?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022204073
greiner3
(5,214 posts)By insulting 75% of the posters here?
Fuck any and all DU'ers who have anything bad to say/think about Dennis.
Holy shit people, Fuck You if you think Dennis will turn on his life long Progressive stance.
I have many problems with Obama and I am vocal on them.
Does this make me a 'turncoat?'
Does this make me a whore for Fox News (granted I will not have a 'bully pulpit' either)?
Does this make me any less of a Progressive?
I think the knee jerk reaction to this news, at least for the non-trolls, is WAY over the top.
Fuck the trolls and any DU member who still has thoughts that Dennis has 'betrayed us' in the light of tomorrow's day.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Holy shit people, Fuck You if you think Dennis will turn on his life long Progressive stance. "
...used to be pro-life. Nothing "life long" there.
Again, you're upset because people hate the notion that he joined Fox Noise. Oh well.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Obama used to be anti-gay marriage. Nothing life-long there either. Your problem with Kucinich is that he IS a liberal, and it really has nothing to do with him being a Fox contributor. That is just the excuse you jumped on to further bash the liberal class. You do realize how transparent the motivation factor for your crew here on DU is don't you?
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Dennis is NOT a progressive. Being a "progressive" entails working for progress. Dennis did nothing of the sort. He accomplished next to nothing in his Congressional career because he has an ego the size of Alaska and threw tantrums every time he didn't get his way exactly how he wanted it. He constantly threw the baby out with the bathwater, rejecting any progress because it wasn't everything he wanted.
"Does this make me a whore for Fox News" -- not unless you are a salaried Fox News employee with your paychecks signed by Rupert Murdoch. Dennis Kucinich is. Are you?
Dennis Kucinich was an obstacle to progress and most certainly not a friend of liberals who were serious about getting things done.
Ted Kennedy is an example of a liberal who amassed a great progressive record while working with other people, something which Kucinich never did.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)That's the difference my friend.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Dennis can honestly join those who say, "there is a vast conspiracy of the normal against the different"
I salute his dedication to be different than most of the so called Democrats in Congress. I think he'll use the money wisely for his own war chest.
The ends justify the interesting means put in front of the bunch of fucked up Fox News watchers, g3.
flvegan
(64,407 posts)Cha
(297,210 posts)Right backatcha, hothead.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Are there no currents, no Al jazeeras, no Huffpos, hell any MSNBCS that he could apply to, no, he went for the ego, and secondly the money.
If Keith O showed up at Fox news, there are would be screams that rival the ninth layer of Hell!
Then again, Keith O would not do this.
and all the people saying "You are just third way people" etc, ask yourself this, how can Dennis be uncomprised if he takers money from Murdoch?
Hell, if he offered to slam Obama for free, I could still see some honesty, but he wanted to aid fox to punish Obama because,like many egotists, he feel once the collapse happen, people will finally listen to him..
onpatrol98
(1,989 posts)I'm for waiting and seeing. He could be a refreshing change. I'm not a fan of Alan Colmes or Bob Beckel, but I actually think Kirsten Powers sounds like the sane one in the group when she speaks. I think Dennis will come across as knowledgeable and give a predominately right leaning audience a "different" point of view.
Maybe he didn't want to work for an MSNBC or Current. I would think it would be more fun to debate differing opinions than to spend all day long with people who think just like me. I think it's a bold move. I think he'll stick to his positions. I don't have to agree with everyone all the time. Maybe it will help Fox users.
They may be losing viewers, but they still have a boat load of them. If there are minds that need changing, I say go to that location and speak. I hope he does well. And, if things go south...after the disclosure agreement wears out, he can come out and share the dirt on Fox.
Win/Win
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)First of all, Fox is not going to let him get points in edgewise,unless it is how much Obama sux. Please, this is not a place where debate happens, it is the WWE of news, where everything is set up beforehand. Actually, since a lot of 'accidents" happen in the WWE, it is in insult to compare the slick, quick edit of Fox to the WWE.
And let's say he storms off, you do not think Fox has a bunch of lawyers, as well as would be james O keefes ready to make up some mystical "footage ' that will be played ad nauseam, judge as proven fact before the screenwriters even bother to write it?
And of course, this is the "we hate Obama so much we will help the GOp" BS that people got tired of, they listened to this meme in 2010, and we all know what happened there.
Dennis is eithe rseeling out, or, even more likely, letting hsi ego run away with him, either way, he is a fool. We do not need to ehar the inevitable "why Dennis K works at Fox" BS.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)however, this entire thread is not about that which makes sense, it's simply about bashing Liberalism,and kucinich going to Fox is nothing more than an opportunity for our conservative astroturf crew to do just than albeit in a round-about way.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)--bvar22
a Mainstream-Center loyal, FDR/LBJ Working Class Liberal Democratic Party activist for over 44 years,
now labeled a Fringe Leftist by some at DU.
I haven't changed.
[font color=firebrick][center]"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone [/font][/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center][/font]
onpatrol98
(1,989 posts)I don't think its a big deal. Me personally, I want to see what he says. If it's astroturf, he won't be on long. But, I would love to see fireworks. I would love to see their ideas challenged in their faces.
If that doesn't happen, I can easily flip the channel. But, realistically speaking, Dennis is on their channel for the money. He needs to pay the bills. But, if he can remain true to his principles, then he'll speak the truth as he sees it and FOX will be paying to hear him speak to millions.
Sometimes we'll agree and sometimes we won't. I wouldn't respect him at all, if all he was capable of doing was "group think". Not to mention, more than just hardcore conservatives watch Fox News. It's just only the conservatives that enjoy it. I watch every news station. I will watch FOX (when I can stand it), CNN, MSNBC, HLN, and whatever else my little cable selection offers. And, there are others who watch it as well. That's the only way they could possibly have the numbers they have.
I just don't watch every one on every news station. I actually like Shep quite a bit. Heck, even my mother watches Fox sometimes. Now, she may be yelling at the TV when she does, but she always had the attitude of, you have to know what other people are saying. You can't live in a bubble.
I wish him luck. If it sucks too badly, I have no doubt he'll either leave or get the boot. I watch when Jon Stewart goes on Fox, too. And, the contrast is huge. He's always in control of his facts. And, he's always interesting when he's confronting half truths and such. And, I do not believe he compromises what he believes when he speaks. I also do not believe liberal causes suffer when his knowledge, demeanor, and command of the situation is showcased.
Truth is portable. You can take it anywhere and it'll always be good.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Polite and reasonable too.
I had to check to see if I was still on DU.
Kudos for THIS:
[font size=3]"Truth is portable. You can take it anywhere and it'll always be good."[/font]
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)There is no room in the progressive front to play nicey nicey with the enemy known as Fox News. Which is a shame, he was a great progressive.
LostinRed
(840 posts)Why is he wasting his time in that sewer pit
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Or else take your payment in 30 pieces of silver.
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)their viewers & "anchors". They'll think he's a for'ner speakin' anudder langweg.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Not really a surprise, considering that he was a frequent guest on the network while he was in Congress.
Cha
(297,210 posts)true. He won't be on fox if he doesn't get in the Lying bashing Pres Obama lockstep mode.
I'm not surprised.. just more pissed at him than when he lost and accused Marcy Kaptur of cheating. Asshole.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)He is not Allan Colmes. He is not one to acquiesce to the punching bag role for anyone. One of the problems in the current range of discussion is that the mainstream media represents Obama as the farthest left anyone can even imagine. The is neither good for the Obama agenda or for the progressive agenda. When Bernie Sanders appears on FOX News - I would say he gets a fair degree of respect and apparently lots and lots of fan mail from ordinary Fox News viewers who discover that they actually agree with him on a lot of issues. I think Dennis may very well be the same.
There are many conservative who will respect an unabashed and unapologetic liberal or progressive a lot more than a weak knee somewhat center left - watered down liberal apologist.
I think Dennis will do very well for the cause. But let's wait and see.
Charles Goya
(18 posts)A problem would be if he turned conservative or failed to defend liberal views.