Conservative Activist Advises GOP: Ignore Hispanics, Go For White Voters Instead.
Source: Mediaite
by Andrew Kirell, May 29th, 2013
The Republican Party should ditch any attempts to reach out to the Hispanic vote and instead focus on courting more white voters. Thats the advice of longtime conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly.
While appearing this week on the Focus Today radio program, Schlafly told host Perry Atkinson that the recent attempts by the GOP to reach out to Hispanic voters through immigration reform constitutes a great myth because immigrants are unlikely to vote conservative anyway.
The Hispanics who come in like this are going to vote Democrat, she said. There isnt the slightest bit of evidence that they are going to vote Republican.
The people the Republicans should reach out to are the white votes the white voters who didnt vote in the last election. There are millions of them. I think when you have an establishment-run nomination system, they give us a series of losers, which theyve given us with Dole, McCain, and Romney and they give us people who dont connect with the grassroots.
Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/conservative-activist-advises-gop-ignore-hispanics-go-for-white-voters-instead/
Who are the grassroots, the bigots and racists? Why doesn't she just tell them to also avoid going after the AA vote, the gay vote, the Asian vote, etc.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Although somebody SHOULD tell Phyllis that those dudes don't like Catholics, either.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I forgot that this woman even existed. I remember her from my childhood, she apparently hasn't changed her tune much.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Phyllis S. always reminds me of the old bat in the first scene of "The Music Man" who accuses Marian the Librarian of essentially sleeping her way to the job.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts)Her kid, Andrew, runs Conservapedia, which is a compendium of knowledge freed from any contamination of liberal bias. Really, that's its purpose. It also has a project to come up with an open-source wiki-wingnut translation of the Bible, one with all of the liberal biases from current translations removed. That's right, his big ambition is to use Conservatism to create another schism in Chrisianity. That guy makes the Tea Party look dilute.
I'm afraid she didn't die fast enough.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts)Then entire basis of it is the press/academia liberal bias conspiracy theory, expanded to worldwide proportions:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
Here are some of his most laughable beliefs.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:Andrew_Schlafly%27s_greatest_insights
It's the kind of quotes you'd read from George W. Bush if he'd been educated exclusively by Patrick Buchanan.
Phyllis is someone who should be given a Darwin Lifetime Achievement Award for reproducing and hence damaging the whole species' chances for survival. Not that Phyllis didn't make other heroic efforts that might qualify her anyway, but the Eagle Forum pales in comparison.
Rest of the family tries to mitigate evil Aunt Phyllis' villainy by brewing Schlafly Beer. A laudable effort, but to truly repair it, they need a time machine.
obama2terms
(563 posts)That even a friend of mine who is pretty conservative looks at it as a joke.
Based on that quick reading, Andy appears to be seriously mentally ill.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)I will always treasure the initial iteration of the article on Florence, Italy:
Florence is a medieval city of the Medicis on the River Ebro in the Italian region of Tucsony. It is known for David's statue, the baptistery and the Dome.
For those of you who have a geography deficit, the Ebro is in Spain, Florence is on the Arno. Tucsony is obviously in Arizony. "Dome" is, I suspect, a typo for Duomo, Italian for "cathedral".
Here is the Conservapedia definition of "liberal":
A liberal is someone who favors censorship of Christianity plus increased government spending and power, as in ObamaCare. Increasingly liberals side with the homosexual agenda, including same-sex marriage. Many liberals favor a welfare state where people receive endless entitlements without working. Liberals are often anti-Christian, or otherwise disagree with moral or social principles held by many American Christians. The liberal ideology has worsened over the years and degenerated into economically delusional views and intolerant ideology. Some liberals simply support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of conservative principles without having any meaningful values of their own.
I would just point out the intolerance of Conservapedia. I can say from personal experience that they will block any contributor who does not toe the party line.
In furtherance of its intolerance, it has articles on such topics as Liberalism and Bestiality. There is an article Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese, which is simply impossible to parody.
There is an unfathomable bias in Conservapedia against the Theory of Relativity, with claims that physics has been corrupted by liberal influences. Apparently, Schlafly confuses relativity in physics with moral relativity. Schlafly believes that the mathematical method of proof by contradiction is somehow flawed. Schlafly is young earth creationist.
Schlafly has some material for home schooling. I pity any student educated by this man.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,076 posts)...? I recall Archie Bunker talking about how, "Phyllis Shoefly...", was going to set things straight.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Deep inside the dark heart of the Tea Party is outright racism against, largely, the AA block but not limited to them.
They thought they could get significant numbers among hispanic voters, but they were wrong.
It's a failed strategy, and it looks like they're going to step it up a notch.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Not that it would be a bad thing..........
Hugs to you and the furry babies.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)As much as the GOP membership vehemently denies its racism, its established members will bolt if it makes itself appealing to minorities. This is not a fact that they will admit, but the Party can't change. Talks of changing the party for minorities are like rumors heard on the Titanic about a rescue boat.
All Schlafly has done is say aloud what the Party will do anyway.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)There aren't enough of them to vote the Republicans into the WH. They'll have a better chance in the House, if it's a conservative district.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)Look at their 2012 field of Presidential candidates, and consider the one before that was George W. Bush. Note the current "leadership" of Boehner and McConnell. After thirty years of drinking toxic Reagan kool-aid, the people who rise to the top of the GOP are the ones most committed to greed and ignorance.
It might play in some gated communities, but when the Republican Party puts its best and dimmest on display, even Conservatives get embarrassed. They kept a grin a bear it approach to Dubya's gaffe a day, pretending there was nothing wrong with the guy. That worked out so badly it will never work again.
They don't admit it, and they never trace it down to their own ideology.
This is not to say that Repubs can't and won't create as much misery as they can as they spiral down the toilet of history. They're pushing their agenda so much in the states because they know their fortunes are declining, and they have a majority of the Supreme Court, and so can keep their policies entrenched forever.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Their major problem is within their own ranks. They both have to contend with the wacky Tea Party bunch. Boehner definitely can't contain them or make them agree to work with the Democrats. I don't envy the guy's job. McConnell is up for reelection and he keeps veering right to avoid being primaried by the T.P. He also has to contend with kooks like Paul and nasty ones like Cruz.
PhilosopherKing
(317 posts)That's right Republicans. Keep taking the advice of this old douche nozzle.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Apparently, she's still around spreading her unique kind of joy.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)bold letters, and pass it around the community with the RNC logo prominently displayed on top and bottom.
I think it would do them a world of good.
As long as they don't get their pillowcases caught when they turn the crank on the machine.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Yeah, they better be careful with those pillowcases.
BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)Don't say or do ANYTHING that would discourage the Rethugs from embracing this strategy!
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Let them sink themselves. They won't see the inside of the WH in decades with that strategy.
We can buy them some shovels in order to help them dig their hole a little deeper.
Baitball Blogger
(46,705 posts)don't take the shovel away from them.
Just say'n.
kmlisle
(276 posts)An echo of the election predictions here. Maybe the word demographics has too many syllables for her.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)calimary
(81,261 posts)Glad you're here! That woman always amazed me. She was out there - as a businesswoman (well, of sorts), commanding big speaking fees and enjoying a high public profile and really getting ahead in the world, building her professional reputation and fame and fortune, taking FULL advantage of everything for which feminists had been fighting! For access. For equal access and equal treatment, breaking barriers down for women so that we could achieve in our own right, and be defined by and as ourselves instead of strictly in regard to whether we did or did not have a man, and to have the doors open and the playing field a little more level so we had a chance to work and expand and achieve and become and express, to NOT have to be hostage to the kind of gonads we had. Especially regarding personal choices, career choices, and life choices.
And all she wanted to do, and clearly still does want to do, was/is to undermine the feminist movement, turn the clock back at least 80 or 90 years (or decades, or more!) and drag the rest of us women and those who love us back to primordial times. Probably, preferably, to when women were property and we didn't have to bother our "pretty little heads" about any of this stuff. I just found that - well, dumbfounding! Seriously, phyllis? You're out there writing books and giving lectures and going on TV and making a fortune and actively influencing policy - that would relegate women to pink collar jobs only, with no opportunity for advancement or to be paid a living wage (especially many female heads-of-households who have no partner to help with the workload) because we womenfolk really all belonged at home with the kids and out of the workforce. So why aren't YOU home too, then? Instead of carrying on in the limelight all the time?
This woman literally built a career trying to prevent generations of women coming up after her from having the opportunities and choices she had. And she sure threw a lot of weight behind the fight against the Equal Rights Amendment. She did everything she could to slow down progress, if not stop it altogether and then roll some of it back.
That said... I hope the GOP does everything she tells them to do! Stick with whites only! Stay true to that diminishing demographic! All the better for the rest of us.
LonePirate
(13,420 posts)If by some miracle we can reclaim the House after the 2014 elections, President Obama might be able to get some things done and then our President will have a nice majority in both chambers follow the sweep of the 2016 elections.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)She is of a generation who lived through the blatant sexism of that era. Why would she oppose something that would help her and all women?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...Phyliss Schafly has said she thinks women are inferior to men and should not have equal rights. I know, I know.... a normal person has no response to such idiocy as this. They were both probably dropped -- often -- as infants. (I think it's instinctual attempt on the part of mothers to preserve the species when they know they spawned a psychopath.)
- But in any event, I now defer to a man who knows how to talk to ladies such as this:
Beacool
(30,247 posts)She says a lot of incendiary things to call attention to herself. In Schlafly's case, I think that she does believe what she spews.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Coultergeist has such a hateful attitude toward most people in the world that she really does believe what she says. I wonder if someday her head will start spinning and then you will hear a few beeps before she self-destructs.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I really don't believe that she really means it.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)especially against their own gender (which I think you will agree with me is horrid). I'm not quite sure what causes her to be that way. I see her the same as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc. She seems to me to be a pathological liar.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)She's just not important enough.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)It's just interesting to wonder what makes her tick.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)that sorta kinda actually maybe made a little sense, even if it was premised on an enormous amount of naivete. I didn't agree with it, but I admired Sorkin for coming up with an argument that didn't make Ainsley sound like a chicken for Colonel Sanders.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Stick with what she knows.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)She seemed old enough to be my grandmother way back in the mid-70s.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I just went and checked, she's 88 with the mind of a 150 year old.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)till someone on the right thought it was a good idea (tea party) to go after them
TygrBright
(20,759 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)well not so sad for Democrats; but tragic for the modern gop, is ...
That statement is exactly correct ... and the modern gop will never figure out why.
CheapShotArtist
(333 posts)Hispanic just refers to one's culture, not anything racial. Basically, you're instructing your party to write off a chunk of White voters.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)I wish you much success in this endeavor.
GoldenOldie
(1,540 posts)Neither of these women nor their ilk, have accomplished anything of worth during their life time. Although they benefited greatly on the backs of women who fought for their right to be educated idiots and their right to use birth control, etc., they chose to be the white, female, whores, of the old white male establishment.....little or no effort. Their only claim to fame is spouting inane crap that they do not really believe nor follow for themselves. They are only responsible to the pimps and their following. No effort is really required in writing books that have simplistic or moronic content, as those that buy and are unable to or will not read them, but they are assured that the pimps will purchase in bulk so as to payoff the whores and place the books on The Best Sellers Lists, in attempt to prove credibility.
Schafly and Coulter are way past their "shelf life." And a hint to both, if they stick around to much longer, they damn well better be able to speak Spanish.
hibbing
(10,098 posts)Hi,
As usual, conservatives always so astute about future trends.
Peace
BDavinciNY
(95 posts)Things like this shows further proof that the Republican Party should change their mascot from an Elephant to a Dinosaur with a teabag! They are very close to extinction but they don't know it yet!
frylock
(34,825 posts)just keep on keepin on, gop.
merrily
(45,251 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)She's very, very smart. You should make her your RNC chairman in fact.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)quite some time. I think the younger generation is turning more dem, but that would probably be from the failure of the gop to engage them.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Stick to it TeaPukers!!!
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)and many, maybe most, of them don't even know it.
John2
(2,730 posts)white voters she is talking about, interact socially with minorities. They are color Blind and not racists. A lot of them don't care about her racist views and white supremacy. Many young Whites go about their business of making a living and don't see their friends as a threat to them. In fact interracial marriage has been on the rise. Look at Obama, he is a product of interracial marriage. They only see Americans and not Hispanics or Blacks. She might be talking about their mother, sister, brother or kids. She might be talking about their best friends. America has changed for her and she can't adjust. Look who is coming to dinner.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I've always tried to be this way and keep getting better at it as time goes on. When I travel to large cities I see it even more. With people much younger as well. Martin Luther King's dream that his children and his children's children be judged by the content of their character (rather than the color of their skin) is becoming more and more a reality. We still have a long way to go. Especially toward economic fairness. But thinking of how much we've accomplished gives me the hope I need to continue the struggle.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)keep as many minorities from voting as possible. Not a hypothetical, a reality, a huge campaign doing exactly that.
Ganja Ninja
(15,953 posts)News flash Phyllis, Not all white people are old shriveled up southern pseudo-christian rednecks.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Like you said, they are not all rednecks.
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)The Cons tries that the last election cycle and lost badly and now many still don't get it? Racism is the opposite of common sense.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)It's not part of the Republican platform.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)If Dems have the votes of women, blacks, Hispanics and anti gun folks...we get the election.
kimbutgar
(21,141 posts)And when the current reich wing is finally destroyed it will be a great for America. Bring back sane republicans who can counterbalance things the way it should be and not be know only for obstructionism.
Please proceed....
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)so that no one will be confused as to your intent...
proclaim it loudly and boldly... everyone needs to hear your message.
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)If they take her advice, then they'll lose even bigger next time. We should mute our criticism of her position on this so we can take back the house in '14.
She's a Neanderthal with tits. Low hanging tits. But, tits nonetheless.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)She might have added that they should avoid going after the women's vote too.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)Still crazy after all these years.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)Maybe evil is a preservative
BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)I remember attending a speech she gave at my college some 20 years ago. Partisan, hateful, close-minded woman.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Hispanics are all the same, and the GOP should be the White Party
Don't you just love it when some of them are at least honest about their party's racism?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)naaa, that will never happen.
Maybe they can change their party name to something that sounds friendly and pull a razzle-dazzle.