Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 03:19 PM Jun 2013

FBI chief says spy tactics could have stopped 9/11 attacks

Source: The Guardian

The FBI has shrugged off growing congressional anxiety over its surveillance of US citizens, claiming such programs could have foiled the 9-11 terrorist attacks and would prevent "another Boston".

The FBI director, Robert Mueller, also revealed that US authorities would be taking action against whistleblower Edward Snowden for revealing the extent of its activities, confirming that the FBI and department of justice were taking "all necessary steps to hold the person responsible".

But Mueller's testimony before the House judicial oversight committee brought angry responses from many congressmen, who questioned whether such surveillance was lawful and demanded to know why it had failed to prevent the Boston bombing if it were so effective.

In a frequently heated debate over balancing privacy and security, Mueller went further than other government officials in claiming that the collection of data on all American phone calls had become an essential part of counter-terrorism efforts and would make the US "exceptionally vulnerable" if watered down.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/13/fbi-mueller-spy-tactics-9-11-boston

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI chief says spy tactics could have stopped 9/11 attacks (Original Post) alp227 Jun 2013 OP
How many times will we let them wave the bloody flag... JCMach1 Jun 2013 #1
Really it could have ? was 'Shareef' on the payroll then too? azurnoir Jun 2013 #2
Boston just happened, er, Bob BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #3
Found a typo there: christx30 Jun 2013 #27
Bullshit. This surveilence has been in place for 12 yeasrs and it didn't prevent the Boston bombings snagglepuss Jun 2013 #4
Sure and DUI checkpoints don't stop all deaths by DUI, so let's stop having those checkpoints. JoePhilly Jun 2013 #8
Joe, the FBI interviewed the Bomber and said 'nothing to see' Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #17
Coulda shoulda woulda, Mueller. Gormy Cuss Jun 2013 #5
Yes, and the Bush administration might could have prevented it had they heeded the warnings from the ladjf Jun 2013 #6
(x) 3,497... KansDem Jun 2013 #15
Yes. Their performance may well have put them in the "treason" range. But, we all know ladjf Jun 2013 #16
Unless of course they actually read the memo which said that intel was working to confirming a plan 24601 Jun 2013 #33
Im so scared I just shit my pants and pissed myself too. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #7
Hey fuckwit. WilliamPitt Jun 2013 #9
After doing all the research for the paper nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #25
I don't think I say often enough how much I enjoy your input. Ash_F Jun 2013 #31
But couldn't stop the Boston Marathon attack. Pull my other finger Mueller. n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #10
Can you say Coleen Rowley? I knew you could. tech3149 Jun 2013 #11
The problem isn't lack of information, the problem is internal to the FBI (and others). SharonAnn Jun 2013 #14
All they had to do was follow the process that was in place BEFORE Baitball Blogger Jun 2013 #12
'It could have prevented that which it did not prevent' Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #13
Bull Shit! Rain Mcloud Jun 2013 #18
Fear mongering at its' best. theplanfor2016 Jun 2013 #19
Not meddling in the Middle East could have stopped 9/11 attacks. Far more likely, in fact. Gregorian Jun 2013 #20
It couldn't have stopped 911. That was an inside job. olddad56 Jun 2013 #21
Well, that's interesting. OnyxCollie Jun 2013 #22
The system could have been in place nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #24
Congress should call Thomas Drake to the stand nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #23
Um, we were onto the terrorists before 9/11. Bushco just chose to ignore the threat. kestrel91316 Jun 2013 #26
Yes, if they'd been mining Cheney's conversations. Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #28
NSA documents show 9/11 warnings shared with, and IGNORED by, Bush Octafish Jun 2013 #29
oh bullshit...they knew something was going down and.... madrchsod Jun 2013 #30
LOL. "Could have?" By that measure, bad weather "could have stopped 9/11 attacks." PSPS Jun 2013 #32
Coleen Rowley and her boss MN tried to tell you annm4peace Jun 2013 #34
What a load. DeSwiss Jun 2013 #35

BeyondGeography

(39,370 posts)
3. Boston just happened, er, Bob
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 03:28 PM
Jun 2013

Tsarnaev was on a watch list and you still didn't know who he was when you were staring at his photo.

He deserves to roasted for that line.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
8. Sure and DUI checkpoints don't stop all deaths by DUI, so let's stop having those checkpoints.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 03:49 PM
Jun 2013

Its like the gun nuts arguing that which ever law you discuss, it would not have prevented event X.

As if that actually tells you anything about whether the law would be valuable overall.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
17. Joe, the FBI interviewed the Bomber and said 'nothing to see'
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:05 PM
Jun 2013

And if a bartender serves a drunk, there is liability in some cases. The Boston Bombers were stopped by the checkpoint and released. Then they crashed into a crowd. That's the DUI analogy.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
5. Coulda shoulda woulda, Mueller.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 03:33 PM
Jun 2013

"Could have" isn't the same as "would have." I could have stopped the 9/11 attacks by being a super hero.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
6. Yes, and the Bush administration might could have prevented it had they heeded the warnings from the
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 03:46 PM
Jun 2013

CIA.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
15. (x) 3,497...
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:19 PM
Jun 2013
Bush knew of terrorist plot to hijack US planes

George Bush received specific warnings in the weeks before 11 September that an attack inside the United States was being planned by Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, US government sources said yesterday.

In a top-secret intelligence memo headlined 'Bin Laden determined to strike in the US', the President was told on 6 August that the Saudi-born terrorist hoped to 'bring the fight to America' in retaliation for missile strikes on al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan in 1998.

Bush and his aides, who are facing withering criticism for failing to act on a series of warnings, have previously said intelligence experts had not advised them domestic targets were considered at risk. However, they have admitted they were specifically told that hijacks were being planned

--more--
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/may/19/terrorism.september11


Apparently, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, et al, didn't know what "bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" meant...

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
16. Yes. Their performance may well have put them in the "treason" range. But, we all know
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:42 PM
Jun 2013

how badly it turned out for the entire world, even including the Islamic World.

24601

(3,961 posts)
33. Unless of course they actually read the memo which said that intel was working to confirming a plan
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 12:21 AM
Jun 2013

for aircraft high-jacking in order to gain release of the blind shaykh.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CIA_Memo.JPG

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
9. Hey fuckwit.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 03:53 PM
Jun 2013

Boston happened exactly 60 days ago. This little program you love has been ongoing in one form or another for more than 4,000 days at the most conservative estimate. Sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up, you bag of stupid fucking fuck. P.S. Fuck you.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
25. After doing all the research for the paper
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:09 PM
Jun 2013

in one form or another since 1948... just thought I would point this out.



Now my challenge, write pretty complex information in an engaging, non dry fashion... damn some of what I just spent reading is dryer than sand in the Sonoran Desert.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
11. Can you say Coleen Rowley? I knew you could.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:06 PM
Jun 2013

She didn't have unlimited surveillance on everyone in her jurisdiction but was able to target and ID the Sept 11 2001 alleged conspirators. She was ignored by staff senior to her.

SharonAnn

(13,772 posts)
14. The problem isn't lack of information, the problem is internal to the FBI (and others).
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:06 PM
Jun 2013

They had information, but ignored it.

It's just the bureaucratic mindset of the FBI itself. And especially it was significant that the FBI had shifted most of its resources to Ascroft's personal campaign against sin, such as prostitution, and away from terrorism and white-collar crime.

theplanfor2016

(14 posts)
19. Fear mongering at its' best.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:33 PM
Jun 2013

Even if it were true, which I doubt, that doesn't mean the activity is just or constitutional.

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
22. Well, that's interesting.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:58 PM
Jun 2013

From the article:

He described how Khalid al-Midhar, one of the 9-11 hijackers, had called a Yemeni safe house from a phone in San Diego shortly before the attack – a phone call that would have been intercepted and acted upon, claimed Mueller, had today's surveillance system been in place.


On March 27, 2008, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, speaking at the Commonwealth Club in defense of the Bush Administrations surveillance program and proposing changes to FISA, made the statement that before the 2001 terrorist attacks:

“We knew that there had been a call from someplace that was known to be a safe house in Afghanistan and we knew that it came to the United States. We didn’t know precisely where it went. You’ve got 3,000 people who went to work that day, and didn’t come home, to show for that.” (Egelko, 2008).


In a letter to Attorney General Mukasey from Rep. John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee; Rep. Jerry Nadler, Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties; and Rep. Bobby Scott, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security (hereinafter “Conyers Letter”), Rep. Conyers responds to Attorney General Mukasey’s statement:

This statement is very disturbing for several reasons. Initially, despite extensive inquiries after 9/11, I am aware of no previous reference, in the 9/11 Commission report or elsewhere, to a call from a known terrorist safe house in Afghanistan to the United States which, if it had been intercepted, could have prevented the 9/11 attacks. In addition, if the Administration had known of such communications from suspected terrorists, they could and should have been intercepted based on existing FISA law. For example, even assuming that a FISA warrant was required to intercept such calls, as of 9/11 FISA specifically authorized such surveillance on an emergency basis without a warrant for a 48 hour period. If such calls were known about and not intercepted, serious additional concerns would be raised about the government’s failure to take appropriate action before 9/11. (Conyers, Nadler, Scott, 2008).


In a statement provided to Glenn Greenwald (2008) at Salon, former Rep. Lee Hamilton, the vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, stated:

I am unfamiliar with the telephone call that Attorney General Michael Mukasey cited in his appearance in San Francisco on March 27. The 9/11 Commission did not receive any information pertaining to its occurrence.


Additionally, Greenwald (2008) provides an email response from Philip Zelikow, the 9/11 Commission Executive Director (and former Counselor to Condolleeza Rice) (ellipses in original):

Not sure of course what the AG had in mind, although the most important signals intelligence leads related to our report -- that related to the Hazmi-Mihdhar issues of January 2000 or to al Qaeda activities or transits connected to Iran -- was not of this character. If, as he says, the USG didn't know where the call went in the US, neither did we. So unless we had some reason to link this information to the 9/11 story....

In general, as with several covert action issues for instance, the Commission sought (and succeeded) in publishing details about sensitive intelligence matters where the details were material to the investigative mandate in our law.
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
24. The system could have been in place
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:05 PM
Jun 2013

it was code named ThinThread, and it was canned by General Hayden.

Before you ask

HTTP://WWW.WHISTLEBLOWER.ORG/PROGRAM-AREAS/HOMELAND-SECURITY-A-HUMAN-RIGHTS/SURVEILLANCE/NSA-WHISTLEBLOWERS-BILL-BINNEY-A-J-KIRK-WIEBE

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
23. Congress should call Thomas Drake to the stand
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:04 PM
Jun 2013

in open session and ask about ThinThread. For that matter Binney and Wiebbe, and ask them about Hayden and how he stopped the internally developed program, instead adopted the contractor Trailblazer and why that failed. In fact, why was Trailblazer canned in 2006, and why a version of ThinThread was deployed without the privacy filters in place.

This is what Congress should be asking.. but they won't. We need Frank Church, or at least the ghost of Frank Church.

Oh and this is the tip of the freaking iceberg.

Now back to work with me.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
29. NSA documents show 9/11 warnings shared with, and IGNORED by, Bush
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:36 PM
Jun 2013

From a year ago:

New NSA docs contradict Bush Administration 9-11 claims

Many of the documents publicize for the first time what was first made clear in the 9/11 Commission: The White House received a truly remarkable amount of warnings that al-Qaida was trying to attack the United States.


Hey! Who's on Dancing with the Stars?

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
30. oh bullshit...they knew something was going down and....
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:37 PM
Jun 2013

they knew who was going to do it. why else would they fly the saudi`s out of the usa hours after the buildings fell.

PSPS

(13,594 posts)
32. LOL. "Could have?" By that measure, bad weather "could have stopped 9/11 attacks."
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 11:52 PM
Jun 2013

J Edgar Hoover thought his dossiers on MLK, RFK, etc., "could have" been useful too.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
35. What a load.
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 02:17 AM
Jun 2013
- The Febbies had it in August 2001 and blew it. Twenty-six days before 911, Zacarias Moussaoui is arrested on immigration charges as FBI agents in Minneapolis grow increasingly suspicious of why he enrolled in 747 flight training. While America Slept

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI chief says spy tactic...