FBI chief says spy tactics could have stopped 9/11 attacks
Source: The Guardian
The FBI has shrugged off growing congressional anxiety over its surveillance of US citizens, claiming such programs could have foiled the 9-11 terrorist attacks and would prevent "another Boston".
The FBI director, Robert Mueller, also revealed that US authorities would be taking action against whistleblower Edward Snowden for revealing the extent of its activities, confirming that the FBI and department of justice were taking "all necessary steps to hold the person responsible".
But Mueller's testimony before the House judicial oversight committee brought angry responses from many congressmen, who questioned whether such surveillance was lawful and demanded to know why it had failed to prevent the Boston bombing if it were so effective.
In a frequently heated debate over balancing privacy and security, Mueller went further than other government officials in claiming that the collection of data on all American phone calls had become an essential part of counter-terrorism efforts and would make the US "exceptionally vulnerable" if watered down.
Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/13/fbi-mueller-spy-tactics-9-11-boston
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)Tsarnaev was on a watch list and you still didn't know who he was when you were staring at his photo.
He deserves to roasted for that line.
christx30
(6,241 posts)He deserves to roasted for that line.
That word should be lie. Hope this helps.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Its like the gun nuts arguing that which ever law you discuss, it would not have prevented event X.
As if that actually tells you anything about whether the law would be valuable overall.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)And if a bartender serves a drunk, there is liability in some cases. The Boston Bombers were stopped by the checkpoint and released. Then they crashed into a crowd. That's the DUI analogy.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)"Could have" isn't the same as "would have." I could have stopped the 9/11 attacks by being a super hero.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)CIA.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)George Bush received specific warnings in the weeks before 11 September that an attack inside the United States was being planned by Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, US government sources said yesterday.
In a top-secret intelligence memo headlined 'Bin Laden determined to strike in the US', the President was told on 6 August that the Saudi-born terrorist hoped to 'bring the fight to America' in retaliation for missile strikes on al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan in 1998.
Bush and his aides, who are facing withering criticism for failing to act on a series of warnings, have previously said intelligence experts had not advised them domestic targets were considered at risk. However, they have admitted they were specifically told that hijacks were being planned
--more--
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/may/19/terrorism.september11
Apparently, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, et al, didn't know what "bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" meant...
ladjf
(17,320 posts)how badly it turned out for the entire world, even including the Islamic World.
24601
(3,961 posts)for aircraft high-jacking in order to gain release of the blind shaykh.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CIA_Memo.JPG
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Boston happened exactly 60 days ago. This little program you love has been ongoing in one form or another for more than 4,000 days at the most conservative estimate. Sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up, you bag of stupid fucking fuck. P.S. Fuck you.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)in one form or another since 1948... just thought I would point this out.
Now my challenge, write pretty complex information in an engaging, non dry fashion... damn some of what I just spent reading is dryer than sand in the Sonoran Desert.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)tech3149
(4,452 posts)She didn't have unlimited surveillance on everyone in her jurisdiction but was able to target and ID the Sept 11 2001 alleged conspirators. She was ignored by staff senior to her.
SharonAnn
(13,772 posts)They had information, but ignored it.
It's just the bureaucratic mindset of the FBI itself. And especially it was significant that the FBI had shifted most of its resources to Ascroft's personal campaign against sin, such as prostitution, and away from terrorism and white-collar crime.
Baitball Blogger
(46,703 posts)Bush came into office.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Boston makes his claims specious.
Rain Mcloud
(812 posts)Bill Clinton tells what he did which the Bush regime ignored.
[link:
theplanfor2016
(14 posts)Even if it were true, which I doubt, that doesn't mean the activity is just or constitutional.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)From the article:
On March 27, 2008, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, speaking at the Commonwealth Club in defense of the Bush Administrations surveillance program and proposing changes to FISA, made the statement that before the 2001 terrorist attacks:
In a letter to Attorney General Mukasey from Rep. John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee; Rep. Jerry Nadler, Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties; and Rep. Bobby Scott, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security (hereinafter Conyers Letter), Rep. Conyers responds to Attorney General Mukaseys statement:
In a statement provided to Glenn Greenwald (2008) at Salon, former Rep. Lee Hamilton, the vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, stated:
Additionally, Greenwald (2008) provides an email response from Philip Zelikow, the 9/11 Commission Executive Director (and former Counselor to Condolleeza Rice) (ellipses in original):
In general, as with several covert action issues for instance, the Commission sought (and succeeded) in publishing details about sensitive intelligence matters where the details were material to the investigative mandate in our law.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it was code named ThinThread, and it was canned by General Hayden.
Before you ask
HTTP://WWW.WHISTLEBLOWER.ORG/PROGRAM-AREAS/HOMELAND-SECURITY-A-HUMAN-RIGHTS/SURVEILLANCE/NSA-WHISTLEBLOWERS-BILL-BINNEY-A-J-KIRK-WIEBE
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)in open session and ask about ThinThread. For that matter Binney and Wiebbe, and ask them about Hayden and how he stopped the internally developed program, instead adopted the contractor Trailblazer and why that failed. In fact, why was Trailblazer canned in 2006, and why a version of ThinThread was deployed without the privacy filters in place.
This is what Congress should be asking.. but they won't. We need Frank Church, or at least the ghost of Frank Church.
Oh and this is the tip of the freaking iceberg.
Now back to work with me.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Eddie Haskell
(1,628 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)From a year ago:
New NSA docs contradict Bush Administration 9-11 claims
Many of the documents publicize for the first time what was first made clear in the 9/11 Commission: The White House received a truly remarkable amount of warnings that al-Qaida was trying to attack the United States.
Hey! Who's on Dancing with the Stars?
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)they knew who was going to do it. why else would they fly the saudi`s out of the usa hours after the buildings fell.
PSPS
(13,594 posts)J Edgar Hoover thought his dossiers on MLK, RFK, etc., "could have" been useful too.
annm4peace
(6,119 posts)what a jack ass mueller is.