Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,630 posts)
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 07:15 PM Jun 2013

Smithfield Foods' 4Q profit falls 63 percent

Source: AP-Excite

By MICHAEL FELBERBAUM

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) - Pork producer Smithfield Foods Inc.'s profit sank nearly 63 percent in the fourth quarter as feed costs rose even as consumers resist price hikes, hog prices fell and its exports to China and Russia declined.

The results reported Friday come only weeks after Smithfield agreed to a $4.72 billion takeover offer from the majority shareholder in China's largest meat processor.

The Smithfield, Va.-based company, whose brands include Armour, Farmland and its namesake, said Friday it earned $29.7 million, or 21 cents per share, for the period ended April 28. That's down from $79.5 million, or 49 cents per share, a year ago, when its results included a $16.8 million benefit from insurance reimbursements.

Revenue rose more 3 percent to $3.32 billion.

FULL story at link.



Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20130614/DA6TJ0UG0.html



Maybe the China company will back out of the buyout?



In this May 29, 2013 file photo, hams and other memorabilia is displayed at a restaurant in Smithfield, Va. Pork producer Smithfield Foods says its net income fell nearly 63 percent in the fourth quarter as it experienced lower hog prices, higher feed costs and a decline in exports to China and Russia. (AP Photo/The Virginian-Pilot, Amanda Lucier, File)

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Smithfield Foods' 4Q profit falls 63 percent (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jun 2013 OP
No more ham? aquart Jun 2013 #1
Ithought it had more to do with being purchased by a Chinese company hollysmom Jun 2013 #2
I'm not eating as much country ham as I used to. BobbyBoring Jun 2013 #3
Nah...they had Profit Decline before they Sold out to China.... KoKo Jun 2013 #4
Good davidwparker Jun 2013 #5
f*** them Skittles Jun 2013 #6

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
2. Ithought it had more to do with being purchased by a Chinese company
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 07:48 PM
Jun 2013

with their high standards of food handling quality for pets, so wouldn't it just be dandy for people?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. Nah...they had Profit Decline before they Sold out to China....
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 08:42 PM
Jun 2013

Consumers...didn't like the 10% Patented Solution they were injecting the poor dead Pigs Carcases with enough to buy and eat the Finished Product.

It was just a typical Consumer Backlash for buying Pork that "tasted Off" for years and then when they put the Disclaimer of the "10% Patented Solution" most of the buyers said:

NO THANKS ...It's DISGUSTING and I won't eat or feed it to my Kids.

PLAIN SPEAK...they Sold Their Brand Down the RIVER...and the Chinese Bought it and will feed the Disgusting "10% Solution" to them and their Kids.

davidwparker

(5,397 posts)
5. Good
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jun 2013

They won't get any of my money. If you want a better ham, get an Edwards ham.

http://virginiatraditions.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/dining/03curi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

I live in the commonwealth and Edwards is 1) much better and 2) not owned by communist China.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Smithfield Foods' 4Q prof...