Italy Plans to Tax Church on Commercial Property
Italy Plans to Tax Church on Commercial Property
By RACHEL DONADIO
Published: February 16, 2012
ROME Over the years, the Italian government has quietly passed scores of laws that benefit the Roman Catholic Church, but it is rare for it to issue a public statement announcing it intends to strip the church of privileges.
The government of Prime Minister Mario Monti took that step on Wednesday, telling the European Commission that it intends to change Italian law to ensure the church pays property tax on the parts of its buildings used for commercial ends.
The church owns vast amounts of property in Italy, and the move is aimed at making sure that convents that offer bed and breakfast or church buildings that rent space to shops pay their full share of taxes.
The change once it is formally drafted and approved by Parliament could result in revenues of $650 million to $2.6 billion annually, according to municipal government associations. It could also set an example for other debt-strapped European countries most notably Greece and Spain where there is growing popular resentment over tax breaks for the church.
More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/17/world/europe/italy-sets-tax-on-church-property.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
Richardo
(38,391 posts)If the Church is profiting from a commercial property, they should be taxed. They can still be exempt for places of worship and residences.
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)the welfare given to churches in the form of no taxation is obscene.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)I am all for it.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)nt
glinda
(14,807 posts)it most certainly does.
LarryNM
(493 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)mopinko
(70,112 posts)they are apoplectic. (not just the church, bunch of non-profits get free water and sewer.)
RayTy
(50 posts)i wont hold my breath...
happyslug
(14,779 posts)Italy wants to tax COMMERCIAL parts of Church Property and that has been the law for decades in the US. Italy will NOT tax churches or other church owned property NOT used for commercial purposes, the same as current US rules.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Churches and parish houses aren't taxed, but property belonging to churches that is subleased or used commercially is already subject to taxation in every state I'm aware of. Religious exemptions for taxes generally only apply to properties that are actually used for religious purposes.
There's also a huge difference between the U.S. and Europe on the actual impact of this type of taxation. In Europe, a millenia and a half of religious power-brokering has left the churches with ownership of a lot of land. Most of that land is simply rented back out to others, with the rent going to the church.
The churches in the U.S. never really had that kind of power, and own relatively little land outside of their actual church sites. The amount of money generated from this kind of taxation is tiny in the U.S. compared to the windfall Italy is pursuing.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)In every state, as far as I know. It goes by state law, obviously.
In the US tax exemptions for non-profits are purpose-based. If it is for a charitable, educational etc purpose, the property isn't taxed, but if it is for a commercial purpose, it is. Tax exemption is not by holder but by purpose.
katty
(11,033 posts)yay
appleannie1
(5,067 posts)TBF
(32,062 posts)I have no problem with places of worship and their accompanying soup kitchens being tax free, but these huge organizations that are selling products etc... - all the commercial enterprise should be taxed.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)AnOhioan
(2,894 posts)crunch60
(1,412 posts)Religion vs Politics .. Robertson's worth..200million to one billion dollars. Now that's a lot of mullah for a Man of God.
snip..
What Robertson failed to mention during his on-air tirades was the $8 million he had invested in Liberian gold mines. His constant concerns about the Stability of Liberia were all but altruistic. One might be crass enough to claim that Robertsons religious status is more about saving money through tax exemption than souls through Gospel. Id rather believe that his conscience simply makes him believe his actions are holy. Robertson also owns diamond mines in Rwanda
http://www.rawstory.com/exclusives/avery/taxing_jesus_122104.htm
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Post removed
valerief
(53,235 posts)SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)Wish we did that here!
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)so should we all.