Momentum Builds Against N.S.A. Surveillance (NYTimes)
Source: New York Times
Momentum Builds Against N.S.A. Surveillance
By JONATHAN WEISMAN
Published: July 28, 2013
WASHINGTON The movement to crack down on government surveillance started with an odd couple from Michigan, Representatives Justin Amash, a young libertarian Republican known even to his friends as chief wing nut, and John Conyers Jr., an elder of the liberal left in his 25th House term. But what began on the political fringes only a week ago has built a momentum that even critics say may be unstoppable, drawing support from Republican and Democratic leaders, attracting moderates in both parties and pulling in some of the most respected voices on national security in the House.
snip
Representatives Jim Sensenbrenner, Republican of Wisconsin, and Zoe Lofgren, Democrat of California, have begun work on legislation in the House Judiciary Committee to significantly rein in N.S.A. telephone surveillance. Mr. Sensenbrenner said on Friday that he would have a bill ready when Congress returned from its August recess that would restrict phone surveillance to only those named as targets of a federal terrorism investigation, make significant changes to the secret court that oversees such programs and give businesses like Microsoft and Google permission to reveal their dealings before that court.
snip
Backers of sweeping surveillance powers now say they recognize that changes are likely, and they are taking steps to make sure they maintain control over the extent of any revisions. Leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee met on Wednesday as the House deliberated to try to find accommodations to growing public misgivings about the programs, said the committees chairwoman, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California.
snip
Aides familiar with his (Mike Rogers-R) efforts said the House Intelligence Committee was focusing on more transparency for the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which oversees data gathering, including possibly declassifying that courts orders, and changes to the way the surveillance data is stored. The legislation may order such data to be held by the telecommunications companies that produce them or by an independent entity, not the government.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/29/us/politics/momentum-builds-against-nsa-surveillance.html?pagewanted=all
pscot
(21,024 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)deurbano
(2,895 posts)so pscot is simply providing the important context you (tellingly?) didn't include in the excerpts you posted:
<<The rapidly shifting politics were reflected clearly in the House on Wednesday, when a plan to defund the National Security Agencys telephone data collection program fell just seven votes short of passage. Now, after initially signaling that they were comfortable with the scope of the N.S.A.s collection of Americans phone and Internet activities, but not their content, revealed last month by Edward J. Snowden, lawmakers are showing an increasing willingness to use legislation to curb those actions.
Representatives Jim Sensenbrenner, Republican of Wisconsin, and Zoe Lofgren, Democrat of California, have begun work on legislation in the House Judiciary Committee to significantly rein in N.S.A. telephone surveillance. Mr. Sensenbrenner said on Friday that he would have a bill ready when Congress returned from its August recess that would restrict phone surveillance to only those named as targets of a federal terrorism investigation, make significant changes to the secret court that oversees such programs and give businesses like Microsoft and Google permission to reveal their dealings before that court.
There is a growing sense that things have really gone a-kilter here, Ms. Lofgren said.
The sudden reconsideration of post-Sept. 11 counterterrorism policy has taken much of Washington by surprise. As the revelations by Mr. Snowden, a former N.S.A. contractor, were gaining attention in the news media, the White House and leaders in both parties stood united behind the programs he had unmasked. They were focused mostly on bringing the leaker to justice...>>
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)If Obama isn't careful, he could end up on the wrong side of this issue. I hope he has the NSA drawing up some ideas on how to work within a modified system.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)over the wrong side of this issue on a tight rope in a high wind. He could climb down, but will he? Afterall, he walked out there in the first place.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)or they ran out of Vaseline.