Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 11:45 AM Dec 2013

Senate Confirms Nina Pillard To D.C. Circuit Court In Late-Night Session

Source: TPM

SAHIL KAPUR – DECEMBER 12, 2013, 9:03 AM EST

The Senate voted 51-44 early Thursday morning, around 1 a.m., to confirm Nina Pillard to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals after Republicans, angry about filibuster reform, forced an all-night session and pushed the vote at the last possible moment.

Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (WV), Mark Pryor (AR) and Joe Donnelly (IN) voted with Republicans against the confirmation.

Pillard, a law professor at Georgetown, became a judge after Patricia Millett was confirmed earlier this week to the powerful court, which looms large in President Barack Obama's second term. The two were confirmed as a result of to Democrats' decision to trigger the nuclear option and eliminate the 60-vote threshold for presidential nominees other than the Supreme Court.

"I thank the Senate for confirming Nina Pillard to be a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which for the first time, will have five active female judges on the bench," Obama said in a statement. "Throughout her career, Ms. Pillard has displayed an unwavering commitment to justice and integrity. Her landmark accomplishments on behalf of women and families include Supreme Court cases defending the constitutionality of the Family and Medical Leave Act and opening the doors of the Virginia Military Institute to female students. I’m confident she will be a diligent, thoughtful and judicious addition to the D.C. Circuit."

:::snip:::



Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/senate-confirms-nina-pillard-to-d-c-circuit-court-in-late-night-session

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Confirms Nina Pillard To D.C. Circuit Court In Late-Night Session (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2013 OP
Senate 2014 yeoman6987 Dec 2013 #1
" Can you imagine the Right Wing Wackos that are going to be confirmed with a Republican Senate" WilliamPitt Dec 2013 #2
Not to mention, there won't be another Republican Senate, ever. Coyotl Dec 2013 #5
Obama still has to nominate. n/t cosmicone Dec 2013 #3
Oh Thank God I forgot that! yeoman6987 Dec 2013 #8
The Republicans continue to obstruct democracy any which way they can. Coyotl Dec 2013 #4
Why would Manchin and Pryor vote against her? starroute Dec 2013 #6
A deal was made. They counted votes and told them to vote how they wanted. 51 was enough Lochloosa Dec 2013 #7
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Senate 2014
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:03 PM
Dec 2013

We better keep the Senate. Can you imagine the Right Wing Wackos that are going to be confirmed with a Republican Senate. I shutter the thought. We must fight like it is the last election in 2014.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
2. " Can you imagine the Right Wing Wackos that are going to be confirmed with a Republican Senate"
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:06 PM
Dec 2013

Um...nominated by whom, exactly?

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
5. Not to mention, there won't be another Republican Senate, ever.
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:27 PM
Dec 2013

Republicans are a self-immolation party at this point. They are even alienating seniors, one of their once-reliable voting blocks.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
8. Oh Thank God I forgot that!
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 01:49 PM
Dec 2013

Your post puts me at ease. Some are saying that Republicans will never hold the Senate again. I am not that confident especially next year. However, your post I completely forgot about. Thank the Lord!!!!!

starroute

(12,977 posts)
6. Why would Manchin and Pryor vote against her?
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:28 PM
Dec 2013

I understand that they're from red states and need to appear conservative on social issues. But why vote against a generally uncontroversial presidential nominee? It doesn't seem like it would gain them any advantage with their constituents.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate Confirms Nina Pill...