California drought: Jerry Brown declares emergency, asks public to ration water
Source: SFGate
Gov. Jerry Brown on Friday officially declared a drought emergency in California, asking residents to voluntarily reduce their water use by 20 percent and committing to bolster the state's dwindling water supplies with better management and federal assistance.
The order, announced at a news conference at the governor's San Francisco office, comes as the state is gripped by a third consecutive year of dry weather.
Rivers are running low. Snowpack is meager. And communities across California are worried about having sufficient water for homes, businesses and farmland. The dry weather also has increased the threat of wildfire, with record acreage burning this month, including a 1,700-acre fire that continues to char the hills above Los Angeles.
With the emergency declaration, Brown said he would make it easier for communities to transfer water from wetter parts of the state to dryer areas. He also said he would seek federal assistance, though he didn't detail that effort.
"We are in an unprecedented and very serious situation," Brown said. "It's important to awaken all Californians to the serious matter of drought and the lack of rain."
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/California-drought-Jerry-Brown-declares-5152625.php
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)and Jerry Brown was governor.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)And no doubt many Californians.
Julie
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)I live in Oregon now. I know a lot of Californians can't take the rain and gray skies here, but I don't think I was meant to exist in a semi-arid landscape. I like greenery and a tree canopy and and rain-washed air and moss and moisture. I'm wondering if that terrible drought of my childhood had something to do with my preference.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Michigander here! Visited Montana a few years ago, everything was beige. And dry. Was glad to get home. Glad you found home.
Julie
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)(can you say "California Aquaduct????"
--future headline on Newsmax
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)And I think it will get ugly.
Julie
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)The drought is not a matter of a single year or a few years. We live in a desert. The more people and the more housing we have, the more water we need. We have to limit our population in this state according to the water supply. Either that or we need to start desalinating the ocean water that is so plentiful at our shores.
We have very mature avocado trees. They were dying until we deep watered them upon the advice of an arborist. If Los Angeles is to be livable as a city, we have to have some trees. I and many like me have switched from grass to succulents to save water, but there are limits. We will be forced to limit our population through some means if we don't find a source for more water. A city of the size of Los Angeles may be unsustainable in a desert climate like Los Angeles.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)and rocks. However they aren't so good at providing a watershed so when it does rain, the hill doesn't slide down.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)My grandfather lived through part of the dust bowl. He became a conservationist. Trees must be protected. They hold the soil together. They secure hillsides. Trees are important and must be watered.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)break. I do give them a deep soak once a month. They are essential.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)This isn't the year to plant, though. :\
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Our house moves with the weather. If it rains we can close or open doors and when it doesn't rain, we can close or open other doors. I changed my front garden to succulents earlier this year. I'm so glad I did although I realize that they don't hold the soil in place.
anasv
(225 posts)Same thing with the doors. It was the clay expanding and contracting. Not that there aren't nasty hillside problems.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I posted below.
someone else
(55 posts)Not enough water? We won't have to limit population, it will move.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Republicons really need to stop lying, and get serious. This is going to impact their families, too.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Some with his sprinklers on!
Cleita
(75,480 posts)they feed a myriad of animal life that depend on them.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)green at this time of year. Now it's dry and yellow. My Irish husband often said how the terrain here in winter reminded him of Ireland and made him a little homesick. I'm glad he didn't live long enough to have to witness this.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Take fewer and shorter showers. Flush toilets once a day if only urine. Wash dishes once a day. Do less and only essential laundry. Don't wash your car. When you water plants, water each area only once a week and do it in the evening so it stays in the ground longer overnight. These little things save a lot of water in a week's time.
grilled onions
(1,957 posts)But when I see all those huge homes and each one complete with a huge pool it makes me wonder how much water it takes to fill each one. Secondly all these homes have so many bathrooms often with kids who tend to play in the water(as kids do) but in the fewer bathroom homes there is often an adult close by telling them to stop playing in the water, turn the water off etc.
At one time California was semi desert to many. Water rationing was a given. It's sad to think that Death Valley mode may come to pass once again.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)use of water because their homes are too big and have too many bathrooms and a pool are the least likely to try to conserve.
Retrograde
(10,136 posts)I've been through a few drought years here, with cutbacks on watering. What an across the board 20% cut does is penalize people who were frugal with water before things got dire. I got rid of my yard long ago, and now have plants that will survive with no summer watering. I'm not planning on planting rice or digging a swimming pool, but I intend to continue with my normal use - which my local utility recently informed me was among the lowest in the neighborhood for a house the size of mine.
Meanwhile, business complexes keep watering that green, green grass and letting the runoff flow into the gutters. When they cut down, I'll consider it.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Im really worried about how this drought is going to affect us, he said. I heard about the drought in the 70s, and how people couldnt water their lawns and wash their cars. They could take only one-minute showers.
Can you believe that? his wife said. Were used to taking an hour.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/us/as-californias-drought-deepens-a-sense-of-dread-grows.html
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)quadrature
(2,049 posts)Californians, apparently,
not so much.
(sarcasm)
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Close ALL the fucking golf courses! Horrendous waste of water.
Brother Buzz
(36,431 posts)How about letting the ones that have been irrigating with treated waste water for decades continue to operate?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)should go to farms. Golf courses are a terrible waste of water, are a terrible waste of land and benefit a very tiny percentage of the population.
GP6971
(31,158 posts)going into the groundwater
Brother Buzz
(36,431 posts)and they will sell it to anyone. Who pays for the pipelines to deliver it to the farmers?
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)...farms use the water to grow lettuce that contains more water than nutrients, farms as well appear to be a "terrible waste...".
.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)There are certain crops, lettuce being one of them, that are a horrible waste of water, esp. for the lack of nutritional value in return. Our entire farming system could use reforming, everything from the use if "icides" to growing fruits, nuts and veggies that require less water to ensuring that minerals and nutrients are added back into the soil by natural means.
Having said that, my ORIGNAL objection was golf courses -- a complete waste of land and water that benefits a very small fraction of the population.
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)...giving industry a pass while calling on the public to sacrifice more. While I don't object to public conservation, more attention should indeed be paid to the "entire farming system" that wastes resources like no industry I know.
The industrial food industry has even given FARMING a bad name.
.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)so, I'm guessing you're a golfer.
Have a nice day.
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)...I own some golf clubs but I don't use them.
I am, however, a picky eater.
.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)similar to the last sustained drouth that we experienced in the 90s, the north will be asked to make sacrifices to benefit the south and central.
roody
(10,849 posts)ripcord
(5,399 posts)But instead of investing a fortune in high speed rail California should be investing in efficient water collection, storage and desalinization, it is without a doubt the most urgent need.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)that will ship all the Northern California delta water to 400 farmers in Fresno and Bakersfield.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)the south and central delivery boy. It is an uphill battle for is environmentalists to defeat this.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)I frequently check the USGS earthquake maps and in the past day there seems to be some increased activity... even for California. Five along the San Andreas.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/
Berlum
(7,044 posts)question everything
(47,479 posts)in SoCal insist of lush water hungry lawns.
Brother Buzz
(36,431 posts)Dimes to donuts says those communities that use reclaimed water for irrigation will be the same asses that will believe they are doing more then their part in water conservation and will make no effort to save water inside their homes; twenty percent reduction is for chumps.
http://www.irwd.com/services/recycled-water