Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:20 AM Jan 2014

Watchdog Report Says N.S.A. Program Is Illegal and Should End

Source: New York Times

Watchdog Report Says N.S.A. Program Is Illegal and Should End
By CHARLIE SAVAGEJAN. 23, 2014



WASHINGTON — An independent federal privacy watchdog has concluded that the National Security Agency’s program to collect bulk phone call records has provided only “minimal” benefits in counterterrorism efforts, is illegal and should be shut down.

The findings are laid out in a 238-page report, scheduled for release by Thursday and obtained by The New York Times, that represent the first major public statement by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, which Congress made an independent agency in 2007 and only recently became fully operational.

The report is likely to inject a significant new voice into the debate over surveillance, underscoring that the issue was not settled by a high-profile speech President Obama gave last week. Mr. Obama consulted with the board, along with a separate review group that last month delivered its own report about surveillance policies. But while he said in his speech that he was tightening access to the data and declared his intention to find a way to end government collection of the bulk records, he said the program’s capabilities should be preserved.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

The program “lacks a viable legal foundation under Section 215, implicates constitutional concerns under the First and Fourth Amendments, raises serious threats to privacy and civil liberties as a policy matter, and has shown only limited value,” the report said. “As a result, the board recommends that the government end the program.”

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/23/us/politics/watchdog-report-says-nsa-program-is-illegal-and-should-end.html?hp&_r=1

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Watchdog Report Says N.S.A. Program Is Illegal and Should End (Original Post) kpete Jan 2014 OP
they're obviously a collection of racist Paul and traitor-lovers stupidicus Jan 2014 #1
Tee hee! Titonwan Jan 2014 #3
what dark agenda-setting conspiracy has snookered the libs THIS time?! MisterP Jan 2014 #4
many I'm sure stupidicus Jan 2014 #7
first it's "we have to talk about inequality now!" and then "it was a mistake" MisterP Jan 2014 #8
lol stupidicus Jan 2014 #9
Wait for it... Titonwan Jan 2014 #2
kick OKNancy Jan 2014 #5
K&R Yo_Mama Jan 2014 #6

Titonwan

(785 posts)
3. Tee hee!
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:49 AM
Jan 2014

Last edited Thu Jan 23, 2014, 10:21 AM - Edit history (1)

Edward Snowden will be answering questions submitted by the public on his official support site, freesnowden.is, this Thursday 23 January at 8pm GMT, 3pm EST. (Today)

Link--
http://www.freesnowden.is/asksnowden/

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
4. what dark agenda-setting conspiracy has snookered the libs THIS time?!
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 04:29 PM
Jan 2014

not like the clearsighted neolib centrists!

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
7. many I'm sure
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 10:18 PM
Jan 2014

dude.

The content of the is TP, and all other indicators for it before too, was why I thought the idea from the neolib centrists that BHO's NSA couldn't be a bit astray legally speaking, was rather silly.

I think that went a long way towards showing the weakness of their hand on the matter from the beginning. Once that fell, they would then of course be in the rather untenable position of defending what is by consensus pov I'd think at this point -- that illegalities have occured.

It seems to me that the only leg BHO/the NSA have to stand on is that it was mistakes over interpretation of the law, in this case mostly Section 215 of the PA. They wouldn't have to go the full Bush defense of "I'm the decider during wartime" as I recall his was with bypassing the FISA court requirement in force at the time. That's a toughie to "interpret" around.

So I expect the "he's better than Bush" defense if it plays out that way. It'll be "a little overzealous interpretaion to keep us safe..." versus "willfully ignoring the clear and unmistable meaning and spirit" of the law...lol

Titonwan

(785 posts)
2. Wait for it...
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:49 AM
Jan 2014

Thanks Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, the Guardian (and to a lesser extent- the NYT's) and all the previous whistle blowers who have jerked away the curtain of illegal spying on American citizens.
That massive data base has only one true purpose- dossiers. OWS protestors, anti-war/poverty/green activists and anyone else who displays dissent most certainly have these permanent records to be used when ever they're a little too 'uppity'.
Remember those overnight and early morning raids on protesters at the RNC convention in 2007?
J. Edgar Hoover deserves to be unearthed and shot out of a trebuchet. Into a brick wall.
Clapper and Alexander deserve long prison sentences at a maximum security facility.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Watchdog Report Says N.S....