Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 06:32 PM Jan 2014

Edward Snowden: ‘Not Possible’ to Return to U.S. Now

Source: ABC News

By Lee Ferran

Jan 23, 2014 4:37pm

Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor that exposed the agency’s most closely held secrets, said today that while returning to the U.S. would be the “best resolution” for everyone, it’s “not possible” now because he does not believe he can get a fair trial.

Charged in the U.S. with espionage-related crimes and living quietly in Russia, Snowden answered Twitter questions today in an online Q&A. When CNN’s Jake Tapper asked under what conditions Snowden would return to the U.S., the 30-year-old said the nearly 100-year-old Espionage Act, under which he is charged, “forbids a public interest defense.”

“This is especially frustrating, because it means there’s no chance to have a fair trial, and no way I can come home and make my case to a jury,” he said.

In a Wall Street Journal Op Ed Tuesday, attorney Jesselyn Radack, who has represented government whistleblowers in the past and has had contact with Snowden, argued similarly that it’s a “fantasy” to think Snowden would be able to mount a solid defense in a fair trial due to Espionage Act-related government restrictions.

-snip-

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2014/01/edward-snowden-not-possible-to-return-to-u-s-now/

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Edward Snowden: ‘Not Possible’ to Return to U.S. Now (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2014 OP
this is why those who call for Snowden to return and face the charges are disingenuous at best.... mike_c Jan 2014 #1
Rather presumptuous, aren't you? We won't know until he returns, will we? George II Jan 2014 #6
Not presumptuous at all. We know from history: Manning. Th1onein Jan 2014 #26
Manning was a sad case, and I really feel sorry for the person. George II Jan 2014 #32
It wasn't just Manning. There were others before him. Th1onein Jan 2014 #42
Lol. n/t ronnie624 Jan 2014 #44
"Chelsea" Manning didn't go on trial, Bradley did. He/she didn't become "Chelsea" until.... George II Jan 2014 #7
What's the point of the quotation marks in "Chelsea" Manning? deurbano Jan 2014 #8
If Manning wants a name change, perhaps the most natural approach would be to petition struggle4progress Jan 2014 #13
To be sure there could not be a "fair" hearing on the name change petition either treestar Jan 2014 #17
The procedure seems pretty simple in Kansas. There might be two hurdles for Manning: struggle4progress Jan 2014 #19
"...is currently domiciled in Kansas and has no plans to move elsewhere in the immediate future." randome Jan 2014 #20
Statute 79-32,109: Definitions struggle4progress Jan 2014 #22
I worked in Kansas for three years. Wouldn't wish that on anyone, even an incarcerated felon. randome Jan 2014 #25
It's a matter of her stated preference and respect (or not) for that choice, not a legal issue. deurbano Jan 2014 #23
I doubt everyone will respect Manning's wishes in this regard: I have already pointed out upthread struggle4progress Jan 2014 #28
If a guy named Theodore asked you to call him Ted . . . markpkessinger Jan 2014 #29
The use of quotation marks in such contexts is sometimes common, in fact struggle4progress Jan 2014 #30
In some contexts, yes, but not in routine references n/t markpkessinger Jan 2014 #31
Of course. And Manning is not using Chelsea as a nickname. It has greater significance. deurbano Jan 2014 #36
Bingo George II Jan 2014 #24
Perhaps, but that person was "Bradley" before and during the trial. George II Jan 2014 #33
The Supreme court should overturn this relic of less-enlightened times Demeter Jan 2014 #2
Not possible in the face of circumstances as they appear now. pa28 Jan 2014 #3
..."living quietly in Russia" ??? SoapBox Jan 2014 #4
arglebargle!!12 frylock Jan 2014 #11
Yeah, geez..."Comrade Eddie"?! Either back to the 50's... or Freeperland (which is kinda the same). deurbano Jan 2014 #37
Are you aware that you just demonstrated that you have no idea what you're talking about? DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #27
Too bad. One doesn't refuse to face charges merely because HE believes he won't.... George II Jan 2014 #5
"Quite honestly, the numbers of those who care are dwindling." Yet, here you are. deurbano Jan 2014 #9
the haters give "media whore" snowden more attention then they care to admit frylock Jan 2014 #12
Yep, working to enlighten the dwindling few of their folly George II Jan 2014 #34
Pssst... Titonwan Jan 2014 #41
I suspect public opinion could be rallied to support immunity for leaking about metadata struggle4progress Jan 2014 #10
Which begs the question... randome Jan 2014 #14
Greenwald's primary interest IMO is whatever magnifies Greenwald struggle4progress Jan 2014 #15
Not enough money has been offered! George II Jan 2014 #35
Since he considers himself above our government, no wonder he thinks the trial would not be fair treestar Jan 2014 #16
"Welcome to another edition of 'Where Are They Now?'" randome Jan 2014 #18
Sure it's possible! jmowreader Jan 2014 #21
Stay where you are buddy. DeSwiss Jan 2014 #38
Right on, DeSwiss! n/t Titonwan Jan 2014 #40
Stay away Edward (for now) Titonwan Jan 2014 #39
The Best thing He could do Cryptoad Jan 2014 #43
Even with full immunity and no prosecution, it would just be a matter of time until they "find" hughee99 Jan 2014 #45

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
1. this is why those who call for Snowden to return and face the charges are disingenuous at best....
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 06:35 PM
Jan 2014

They know he will only face a foregone conclusion in a kangaroo court, where he will not be allowed to defend himself. He'll be railroaded, just like Chelsea Manning was railroaded.

George II

(67,782 posts)
32. Manning was a sad case, and I really feel sorry for the person.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 10:56 PM
Jan 2014

Assange saw a mixed up individual that he could manipulate, and he duped Manning into stealing all those documents for his own benefit. So Manning winds up going to jail (and I'm sure a horrendous existence) for decades while Assange sips champagne in the cushy environs of a foreign embassy.

As much as I pity poor Manning, I despise Assange even more.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
42. It wasn't just Manning. There were others before him.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 05:44 AM
Jan 2014

Who did, indeed, try to go the straight route. Their lives were ruined.

George II

(67,782 posts)
7. "Chelsea" Manning didn't go on trial, Bradley did. He/she didn't become "Chelsea" until....
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 07:12 PM
Jan 2014

.....AFTER the trial.

What makes you think he was railroaded?

deurbano

(2,895 posts)
8. What's the point of the quotation marks in "Chelsea" Manning?
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 07:51 PM
Jan 2014

Also, the person who went on trail was the same person after the trial... and that person now prefers to be called Chelsea.

struggle4progress

(118,290 posts)
13. If Manning wants a name change, perhaps the most natural approach would be to petition
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:49 PM
Jan 2014

a court for the name change

As matters now stand, Manning, as a prisoner at Leavenworth, is still officially known as "Bradley Manning;" the records of the case were always similarly styled; and Manning's 21 August 2013 application to the Office of the Pardon Attorney, seeking a Presidential pardon for "Bradley Edward Manning," is signed "Bradley Manning"

treestar

(82,383 posts)
17. To be sure there could not be a "fair" hearing on the name change petition either
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:04 PM
Jan 2014
The court would likely follow the law as it stands, which may be different from what Manning wants, in which case, it's "unfair."

struggle4progress

(118,290 posts)
19. The procedure seems pretty simple in Kansas. There might be two hurdles for Manning:
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:20 PM
Jan 2014

first, establishing Kansas residency; and second, actually appearing in court personally to defend the name change, if the judge considers it necessary

The first is probably easy, as Manning is currently domiciled in Kansas and has no plans to move elsewhere in the immediate future. The second could present a problem, since Leavenworth officials might not be much inclined to help Manning appear in a Kansas court for a name-change, lest various other prisoners at Leavenworth conclude a name change offers a handy excuse for a daytrip outside the walls: maybe, however, a good lawyer might persuade a Kansas judge that Manning's name-change did not require much special investigation

Beyond that, it's just fees, some newspaper notices, and some paperwork, then a court date

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
20. "...is currently domiciled in Kansas and has no plans to move elsewhere in the immediate future."
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:22 PM
Jan 2014

Oh, you of the subtle wit!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)
[/center][/font][hr]

struggle4progress

(118,290 posts)
22. Statute 79-32,109: Definitions
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:32 PM
Jan 2014

... (b) "Resident individual" means a natural person who is domiciled in this state. A natural person who spends in the aggregate more than six months of the taxable year within this state shall be presumed to be a resident for purposes of this act in absence of proof to the contrary ...
http://kansasstatutes.lesterama.org/Chapter_79/Article_32/79-32x109.html

Kansas Administrative Regulations
92-12-4a. Resident individual. (a) ... “Kansas resident” shall have the same meaning as that assigned to the term “resident individual” in K.S.A. 79-32,109 ...
(1) Subject to the further conditions and requirements in this subsection, “domicile” shall mean that place in which a person’s habitation is fixed, without any present intention of removal, and to which, whenever absent, that person intends to return ...

http://rvpolicy.kdor.ks.gov/Pilots/Ntrntpil/IPILv1x0.NSF/ae2ee39f7748055f8625655b004e9335/172c2d615f169b8e86257146004a9afa?OpenDocument

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
25. I worked in Kansas for three years. Wouldn't wish that on anyone, even an incarcerated felon.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:34 PM
Jan 2014

Okay, there were some good times, too.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)
[/center][/font][hr]

deurbano

(2,895 posts)
23. It's a matter of her stated preference and respect (or not) for that choice, not a legal issue.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:33 PM
Jan 2014

My daughter's legal name is still the name that was on her birth certificate in Vietnam. She prefers to be called by her American first and last name, so everyone respects her wishes-- without feeling compelled to use snarky quotation marks.

struggle4progress

(118,290 posts)
28. I doubt everyone will respect Manning's wishes in this regard: I have already pointed out upthread
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 10:22 PM
Jan 2014

that Manning signed the Presidential pardon request "Bradley Manning" in late August, and that the institution of confinement still identifies the prisoner as "Bradley Manning"

There are, of course, multiple issues here, such as the defense claim that Manning's leaks resulted from a medical condition, sometimes called gender identity disorder or gender dysphoria. The issue, whether Manning suffers from such a condition, can be resolved neither by Manning's self-diagnosis nor by casual posts on internet bulletin board but is instead simply a matter that must be considered by appropriate physicians. A related issue, whether Manning's medical condition ameliorates responsibility for some criminal acts, will be resolved only by combining available expert medical testimony with knowledge of current legal theories of diminished responsibility. To date, I have encountered no information on Manning's appeal, though the fact that counsel did attempt, in part, a diminished responsibility defense, which seems to have failed, suggests that the appeal will include arguments that the gender dysphoria diagnosis was not properly considered in verdict or in sentence

... Attorneys representing Pfc. Bradley Manning, a 24-year-old Army private previously identified as gay, startled observers at a pre-court martial hearing on Saturday by saying allegations that Manning leaked classified U.S. intelligence information could be linked to a personal struggle over his gender identity ...
Lawyers say Bradley Manning struggled with gender identity disorder
December 19, 2011
By Lou Chibbaro Jr. on December 19, 2011

I myself have never interacted with Manning in any manner. My knowledge of Manning is essentially limited to the unauthorized disclosure of hundreds of thousands of files Manning never have read. I have at present no cause to form any definite opinion whatsoever about any alleged psychiatric or medical condition Manning might suffer. On purely abstract grounds, I consider it a serious mistake to portray Manning as a poster-child for the gay community -- as some apparently wanted to do through election to Grand Marshal of San Francisco Pride -- or to make Manning the face of persons suffering gender dysphoria, especially as such portrayal is related to a particular court-martial defense strategy

Manning's daily interactions currently will be with guards and fellow-prisoners, and the modes of address by guards will be largely governed by regulation. If Manning strongly prefers not to be known as "Bradley Edward Manning," then a name-change seems an appropriate route for change

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
29. If a guy named Theodore asked you to call him Ted . . .
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 10:32 PM
Jan 2014

. . . Would you insist on putting Ted in single quotes?

deurbano

(2,895 posts)
36. Of course. And Manning is not using Chelsea as a nickname. It has greater significance.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 11:29 PM
Jan 2014

It also was just thrown in gratuitously by the poster upthread, since it has nothing to do with agreeing with or refuting the position that Manning was railroaded.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
2. The Supreme court should overturn this relic of less-enlightened times
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 06:45 PM
Jan 2014

so that we can have democracy at last.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
3. Not possible in the face of circumstances as they appear now.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 06:51 PM
Jan 2014

It seems to me that he's saying he could return with an immunity deal.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
4. ..."living quietly in Russia" ???
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 07:05 PM
Jan 2014

ROFLMAO

Comrade Eddie, the media whore?????

He CANNOT keep his mouth shut!

Traitor Snowden, you are NEVER coming back to America. Try Somalia or some such place.

deurbano

(2,895 posts)
37. Yeah, geez..."Comrade Eddie"?! Either back to the 50's... or Freeperland (which is kinda the same).
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 11:35 PM
Jan 2014
 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
27. Are you aware that you just demonstrated that you have no idea what you're talking about?
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 10:03 PM
Jan 2014

Really. It's provable. I just wasn't sure if you were aware of how this makes you look.

George II

(67,782 posts)
5. Too bad. One doesn't refuse to face charges merely because HE believes he won't....
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 07:09 PM
Jan 2014

....get a fair trial. That's a slap in the face of America's judicial system.

Quite honestly, the numbers of those who care are dwindling. It may reach the point that only three people consider him relevant any more - he himself, Glenn Greenwald (until he finds another dupe), and Vladimir Putin.

struggle4progress

(118,290 posts)
10. I suspect public opinion could be rallied to support immunity for leaking about metadata
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:37 PM
Jan 2014

But he's gone rather beyond that: he provided the Chinese with information about Chinese addresses; he provided some technical details about UK intercepts; and so on

And he's managed to provoke quite a number of diplomatic crises completely unrelated to metadata collection

Moreover, he set out to do something like this: he says he took the BAH job because it might offer him the ability to obtain documents, and he then obtained a number of them by conning co-workers into revealing their passwords to him. In all, he obtained something like 1.7 million files, more than twice as many as Manning -- so, like Manning, he cannot have known the contents of most of the documents he handed over



 

randome

(34,845 posts)
14. Which begs the question...
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:54 PM
Jan 2014

...why hasn't Greenwald released anything of late? It's been a while, hasn't it?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)
[/center][/font][hr]

treestar

(82,383 posts)
16. Since he considers himself above our government, no wonder he thinks the trial would not be fair
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:01 PM
Jan 2014

He thinks he should be above our law. Too bad for him he's in a place that has a much more repressive government. I don't think it's going to respect his opinion that he gets to do whatever he pleases.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
18. "Welcome to another edition of 'Where Are They Now?'"
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:11 PM
Jan 2014

"Tonight, we interview local goat herder Edward Snowden. It may be hard to visualize but Mr. Snowden once worked for the American intelligence services. Good afternoon, Mr. Snowden, how is your herd today?"

"Whuh? Huh? Oh. Right. Did you see that light in the sky?"

"Mr. Snowden, you were once in a position of great trust for the American National Security Agency before you stole classified information and gave it away to foreign journalists. Can you tell us how you've adjusted to your life in Russia?"

"Sure. Right. Mr. One-Horn here is my best friend. He only has one horn. But he likes the other goats."

"Ohhhh...kay, Mr. Snowden, thank you for your time. Give our regards to Wikileaks or Vladimir Putin. Or...the goat association or whatever it is that you...whatever. Stop that. We're on camera. Good night, everyone!"
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)
[/center][/font][hr]

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
21. Sure it's possible!
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:28 PM
Jan 2014

The minute he's no longer useful to the Russian government, they'll just take him into custody, call the US Embassy and ask that he be picked up.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
38. Stay where you are buddy.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 11:37 PM
Jan 2014

You have all the leverage now. And as these revelations continue the water will get hotter for them, not you.

- Fuck 'em.....

K&R

Titonwan

(785 posts)
39. Stay away Edward (for now)
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 03:16 AM
Jan 2014

America is under the influence of propaganda and police state policy. Until we get this under control- there won't be any justice.
End the evil 'patriot' act. Rein in the NSA. Give this guy a medal, fer chrissakes.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
43. The Best thing He could do
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 07:38 AM
Jan 2014

for his cause would be to return and face the music, but it wouldnt be the best thing for him. The Gubermint is glad that he is where he his!

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
45. Even with full immunity and no prosecution, it would just be a matter of time until they "find"
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jan 2014

kiddie porn on his computer, a pound of heroine in the trunk of car, or a dead prostitute in his basement.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Edward Snowden: ‘Not Poss...