Autism rates now 1 in 68 U.S. children: CDC
Source: CNN
One in 68 U.S. children has an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a 30% increase from 1 in 88 two years ago, according to a new report released Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
This newest estimate is based on the CDC's evaluation of health and educational records of all 8-year-old children in 11 states: Alabama, Wisconsin, Colorado, Missouri, Georgia, Arkansas, Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Utah and New Jersey.
The incidence of autism ranged from a low of 1 in 175 children in Alabama to a high of 1 in 45 in New Jersey, according to the CDC.
Children with autism continue to be overwhelmingly male. According to the new report, the CDC estimates 1 in 42 boys has autism, 4.5 times as many as girls (1 in 189).
<snip>
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/27/health/cdc-autism/
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)That doesn't bode well, it's either becoming epidemic and thus due most likely to some environmental factors, or the data is wrong and it's being misdiagnosed.
Or, some combination of these things.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)CSStrowbridge
(267 posts)You are probably right. People are being diagnosed with it, because the symptoms are better understood.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)"...the burden of proof is upon anybody who feels that there is NOT a real increase here in the number of kids affected."
- Dr. Thomas Insel, Director of National Institute of Mental Health and head of Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC)
The increase could be a growing number of children with autism or better screening or a combination of both, said Dr. Coleen Boyle, the CDCs director of the national center of birth defects and developmental disabilities.
Related: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014766480
[img][/img]
cprise
(8,445 posts)No proof required!
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)Will neurotypicals go the way of neanderthals and dinosaurs?
http://isnt.autistics.org/
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)She'll love the site you included, " Tragically, as many as 9625 out of every 10,000 individuals may be neurotypical."
She's toying with autistic and sufferers of ADD and ADHD from an approach suggesting that atypical/anormative behaviors/conditions might actually be coping mechanisms, reactions to environment, and/or traits beneficial to a changing world.
She just got started with this, but the interest is based on her having worked with this population for her entire career.
You both might be onto something.
Lars28
(84 posts)So is the political, economic and social system that encourages them.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Where almost everyone is "suffering" from these "disorders" and the systems might naturally change.
I certainly agree, the systems are maladaptive and unresponsive (but to those few in power).
kmlisle
(276 posts)If Autism is a a genetic condition that is affected by multiple alleles (ie many genes combine to produce this and other types of social and mental behaviors) then the Autism spectrum makes sense because there are many combinations of genes that create that spectrum. Think hair and skin color and you will begin to get the idea here. Those are also multiple alleles and recombining the genes produces a lot of variability and a spectrum of traits. This also means that if there is an advantage for a person with Autism in modern society then the folks on the end of the spectrum that allows them to function reasonably well socially posses other advantageous abilities and represent selective pressure for that personality type and for those genes. Think engineers and scientists and IT types and you will have the group in your sights. That's a lot of people in the Creative Class who do well in modern environments. If more and more of these people are surviving well and reproducing then their children's genes will fall somewhere on the spectrum and the variations will produce more at both ends of that spectrum.
I think the position of the autism web site above is also an excellent comment on modern society as it gets more rigid and intolerant of children who don't fit its cookie cutter molds (think ed reform which really veers in this direction). Diversity is strength in nature not weakness. we are more prepared for coming changes as a human population when diversity is honored and accepted. And we obviously are not defining the advantages of autism along with its disadvantages in the current rigid world view.
Its just natural selection at work!
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)"has been diagnosed with" would be the more accurate way to put it. It's very unlikely that the actual rate of incidence (as opposed to the rate of reporting) has increased by 30% in 2 years.
gordianot
(15,237 posts)in describing the Autism spectrum.....Years ago I worked in a small rural district that had 7 children in a two year span in a quarter mile radius of a long abandoned WWII era wood treating plant. It was strange they were all severe and very similar. At least that was the suspicion of locals; how do you prove it? Nothing like that has happened since in that area.
By the time I retired 5 years ago parents were coming in to schools asking for an autism diagnosis where a decade from that time they focused on ADD. The figure going around 5 years was 1 in 150.
ffr
(22,669 posts)No cure for autism.
Environmental damage? Mercury in our fish? Toxins in the food supply and unnatural foods? Artificial sugary syrupy junk foods?
mathematic
(1,439 posts)So something uniquely american (or otherwise not common worldwide) doesn't make a good candidate as a cause.
My guess is that this is a change in diagnostics more than a change in actual incidence.
Lars28
(84 posts)So that suggests a genetic component.
demigoddess
(6,640 posts)boys only have one X chromosome, and on the X is some of the resistance to disease etc.(if I remember right) also if the X is damaged girls have another than can make up for the missing parts. Boys are more vulnerable to things, period.
Lars28
(84 posts)Another piece of evidence against the existence of a just God. But then I suppose He tries to balance things out by making life worse for females in other areas of life, e.g., painful childbirth, male oppression, etc.
The total quantity of good and evil always adds up to zero.
Sigh.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I think what's different is that kids are now being "diagnosed" with autism, whereas when I was a kid we were just "different" kids.
There are a lot of incentives both to classify kids in educational systems and for parents to get their kids slapped with the official label, so I think this is a bureaucratic phenomenon.
mia
(8,360 posts)Listen to the NPR broadcast here.
The symptoms of autism may not be obvious until a child is a toddler, but the disorder itself appears to begin well before birth.
Brain tissue taken from children who died and also happened to have autism revealed patches of disorganization in the cortex, a thin sheet of cells that's critical for learning and memory, researchers report in the New England Journal of Medicine. Tissue samples from children without autism didn't have those characteristic patches.
Organization of the cortex begins in the second trimester of pregnancy. "So something must have gone wrong at or before that time," says Eric Courchesne, an author of the paper and director of the Autism Center of Excellence at the University of California, San Diego.
The finding should bolster efforts to understand how genes control brain development and lead to autism. It also suggests that treatment should start early in childhood, when the brain is capable of rewiring to work around damaged areas....
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/03/26/294446735/brain-changes-suggest-autism-starts-in-the-womb
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)...according to the rigorous, science-vetting, informed autism parents. Seen on Twitter (multiple sources) last night. I recall it was mentioned that 'normal' children also may have this anomaly. They had a lot to say about the researcher's previous work, also, by the way.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)In the years that I have worked with autistic children, in two different states, only ONE was a girl. In one family both their sons were autistic, but their three daughters weren't.
hoosierlib
(710 posts)The increased rate is a function of two things;
1) The definition has been expanded over the years and more people are looking for it
2) The average age of parents has been increasing steadily over the past 40 years as more and more couples have delayed child birth for economic or personal reasons. Over the same time period we have seen the rapid increase. While I understand this is purely correlation (much like CO2 contributing to climate change), there is some validity to this theory.
It is my opinion is that autism, much like downs syndrome, is related to gene mutations that take place within chromosomes with the parents as they age. The longer they wait, the higher the risk of gene mutations and thus a higher chance of autism. Have you ever met the parent of a child with autism that were under 30 (note a mother or father who is under 30 with a partner that is over 30 doesn't count)? I haven't and understand that this observation is purely anecdotal.
The recent study comparing child brain tissues only further bolsters my belief.
Additionally, why is autism given such a stigma? While there are extreme cases, we have gotten people like Temple Grandin who have contributed greatly to humanity.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)hoosierlib
(710 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I have a son with autism and while he does require additional education on social cues and a little more time to process what he learns at school, I promise you it's not that bad. He has many great attributes and strengths, and he laughs and plays and is happy.
alp227
(32,020 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)way our society functions. Just the 'theory of mind' issues could be why some people are radically attached to a religion or a political party. Unable to change, adapt or accept others opinion or diversity.
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)I am autistic. I am better adapted to where society is going than you neurotypicals.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)and extremely environmentally destructive. To the extent applied globally: Think of the middle ages, but with high technology. And a much smaller population, most of which will be living in controlled artificial environments, with protective gear needed in order to venture 'outside'.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)No focus on what the h. effects the brain development of the 2 month fetus. The entire society bickers over anything, might is right. 2 class system. Have nots, 'voiceless', the 'haves' eccentric in various unforeseen ways, no empathy for man, land or beast.
perhaps some other first world country will discover what chemical effects the fetus. The chemical will be banned around the world except in the USA. Here they'll jail the parents. ( it's probably the common alcohol or a combination, alcohol + ?.)
Rex
(65,616 posts)I think there is a very big misunderstanding from people that are not autistic.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)That is a horrible thing to say.
The 'theory of mind' problems associated with autism have nothing to do with an inability to accept other people's diversity. On the contrary, they lead to an inability to manipulate or deceive; and too often to being bullied and isolated as other people are unable to accept autistic or other disabled people's diversity.
THIS is what happened to a local autistic man:
http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/11112129.Government_admits_Mark_Wood_s_benefits_cut_before_he_starved_to_death__was_wrong_/
And you think that autistic people are the ones responsible for the problems in society??? On the contrary, people in power are responsible for the problems in society; and autism tends to make it difficult to seize power.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)Just as far fewer people in power are blind/ deaf/ suffering from depression/ chronically ill or disabled in any other way/ from poor backgrounds/etc. than the overall proportion in the population.
Starting with any disadvantage makes you less likely to get into power. Autism in particular makes it hard for you to manipulate other people, which is important in getting into power.
On the other hand, probably psychopaths are over-represented among people with power.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)other researchers tried to replicate Baron-Cohen's results with older children, and the Autistic ones correctly said that Anne thought the box still had Smarties in it. Thus, whatever ability Baron-Cohen was describing is delayed, not absent.
P.S. There are quite a few Autistic DUers.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)by Laura Sanders
2:10pm, March 28, 2014
Ever-increasing numbers of autism diagnoses have parents worried about a skyrocketing epidemic, and this weeks news may only drive alarm higher. Perhaps it shouldnt.
<SNIP>
But the numbers might not reflect a spike in actual cases. Instead, the rise might be driven, at least in part, by an increase in diagnoses. The estimates are drawn from a collection of organizations that provide services to children with autism, including doctors, schools and social service agencies. As awareness builds and more people look for signs of autism, these numbers will keep going up.
Regional spottiness suggests that better autism detection is feeding the increase. The autism rate in Alabama is just one in 175, while the rate in New Jersey is one in 45, the CDC reports. It would be surprising, and scientifically really important, if children in Alabama were truly much more protected from the disorder. Instead, differences in diagnosis rates are probably at play.
If these alarmingly high numbers are driven by professionals and parents better spotting autism, thats nothing to be alarmed at. On the contrary: This is good news. The earlier therapies begin, the better kids with autism do. Thats the idea behind CDCs Learn the Signs: Act Early program to educate people about signs that something might be amiss with a child. So our best move is to find the kids who need help, and find them when theyre young. Most kids, including the ones in the new CDC survey, arent diagnosed with autism until about age 4 1/2. But whatever goes wrong happens long before then.
https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/growth-curve/autism-spike-may-reflect-better-diagnoses-and-thats-good-thing?utm_source=Society+for+Science+Newsletters&utm_campaign=dd13ea88b3-Editors_picks_week_of_March_24_20143_29_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_a4c415a67f-dd13ea88b3-93315837
Emphasis added by me.