Fierce fighting reported in Ukraine's Mariupol
Last edited Fri May 9, 2014, 10:17 AM - Edit history (3)
Source: RTE
Fighting between troops and pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine's southeastern city of Mariupol has left 21 people dead.
Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said 20 insurgents and one police officer were killed.
Mr Avakov said that five policemen were wounded and four rebels were captured.
The Interfax-Ukraine news agency said police were trying to take back control of the police building when they came under fire from pro-Russians who had taken the interior ministry building.
Read more: http://www.rte.ie/news/2014/0509/616263-ukraine/
(Sky News)
Eight pro-Russian militants have been reportedly killed in eastern Ukraine as Vladimir Putin landed in Crimea for his first visit since it was annexed by Moscow.
Ukrainian troops used large-calibre weapons as they tried to take an occupied police HQ in the southeastern port city of Mariupol.
Sky's Katie Stallard, in Mariupol, said there is black smoke over the city and heavy fighting.
She said the police HQ was taken by pro-Russian gunmen on Thursday night, and Ukrainian forces are now trying to retake it.
http://news.sky.com/story/1258205/ukraine-crisis-eight-rebels-killed-in-mariupol
https://twitter.com/shaunwalker7/status/464764465133944833
2:50 PM - 9 May 2014
https://twitter.com/shaunwalker7/status/464764958421823488
2:52 PM - 9 May 2014
Tank with local youth speeds past flying Donetsk Republic flag. Today in Mariupol feels more like civil war than any day so far
https://twitter.com/shaunwalker7/status/464765440481591296
2:54 PM - 9 May 2014
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Separatists claim Ukrainian troops used armored vehicles in Mariupol
Moscow/Kyiv - The self-defense forces in Mariupol claimed that a Ukrainian law enforcement contingent has made use of military hardware while storming the city police department.
"Armored vehicles have approached the city police department. The building is being shelled. It is an old building with thick walls which cannot be crushed by gunfire," a spokesman for the self-defense command told Interfax-Ukraine.
He said, citing immediate reports, that several dozen police officers remain inside the building. They refused to fulfill Kyiv's orders. Information about casualties is being verified, he said.
Local media reported, meanwhile, that the city police department and military garrison are being stormed. Military hardware is approaching the city from the airport. Streets are being closed for traffic and local residents have been denied access to this part of the city.
"The sound of shooting can be heard in the center of Mariupol," says a posting on the 0629.ua Web site.
http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/separatists-claim-ukrainian-troops-used-armored-vehicles-in-mariupol-347073.html
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)It sounds like a situation in which they would be useful.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)trying to limit any civilian casualties. Good thing.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)People just standing around. Then there were gunshots and they were on the ground, with bloodstains spreading.
On edit: Here's the video. These people didn't look like "rebels." They start dropping at about 7:10.
pampango
(24,692 posts)for capturing cities that are controlled by 'rebels'. It's a bit of a neo-con tactic but it works!
First make sure you have the tanks and planes and they don't. Second surround the city and seal it off. Then use your bombs and tanks from far away to reduce the city to rubble. (Some would say there is a risk of 'collateral damage', i.e. killing civilians, women and children, but you have to be tough to defeat the 'rebels' who are entrenched in the city. Can't let danger to civilians stand in your way. You start playing by the "rules" and you are weak and destined to lose. Besides the 'accidental' deaths of a lot of civilians sends a powerful 'message' to those who resist you. Just ask Vlad, George and Bashar.)
When the city is sufficiently 'softened up' send in your soldiers to do the block-by-block, house-by-house fighting against hopefully demoralized and weakened 'rebels' and the civilians that may be foolish enough to get in the way.
It is a classic neo-con battle strategy. You use your superior military power to defeat a weaker opponent; you and your country look "strong" and "respected" - not to be trifled with; battlefield success boosts your political popularity at home; you kill a lot of civilians (bad PR for a while but nobody pays attention for long) and destroy a lot of buildings and infrastructure (imagine the money to be made during reconstruction); not many of your guys get killed because you are blasting the city from miles away and high in the sky so there's relatively little political resistance back home.
The Kiev government has apparently done the first two, relatively easy, steps: they have the tanks and planes and the 'rebels' do not; they have surrounded the city and sealed it off. We shall see if they are really up for the next step - the big 'neo-con' step of unleashing the power of the tanks and planes on the 'rebels' in the city. So far Kiev has not shown the same level of 'determination' that Vlad, George and Bashar have shown in similar situations. That may change but I have my doubts.
The Kiev government seems to have followed the first two requirements of the strategy. Their side has tanks and planes. The 'rebels' do not. And they cut off the city so that reinforcements and supplies cannot enter.
However, they messed up big time by sending in their forces right away. Vlad, George and Bashar will tell you that your planes and tanks can 'soften up' the city from miles away and high up in the sky. There is little risk to your troops that way. When the time is right - you've killed some of the 'rebels' and enough civilians that they know you mean business and won't be throwing themselves at your tanks - then you send in your troops.
The idea of sending in your troops too early - even if that MAY reduce civilian casualties that would have occurred with indiscriminate heavy shelling and bombing - may sound good to liberal politicians but it is not the tactic that worked in Grosny, Fallujah and Homs.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)That's where Kiev does not meet the first requirement of the Vladimir W. al Assad strategy - "First make sure you have the tanks and planes and they don't." The 'rebels' don't have tanks and planes but their friends just a few miles away have plenty of them.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)No, you can not tell who fired and where it came from. I guess you assume no Pro Russian people have weapons, only flowers right?
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)all of those civilians and they do not seem to be shooting from the uniformed side in their direction.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Sending some scared young conscripts is always a bad idea.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Look at the first video, Hint it was one of those "unarmed civilians" firing at the soldiers.
http://www.itv.com/news/story/2014-04-23/russia-ukraine-tensions/
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)on their news ticker. They have a reporter , Katie Stallard , on the spot.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)KIEV (Reuters) - Ukraine's interior minister said security forces had killed about 20 pro-Russian rebels in the port city of Mariupol on Friday, in what appeared one of the biggest actions in Kiev's attempt to end an insurgency in the country's east.
Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said an attempt by "terrorists" to seize police headquarters turned into a pitched battle inside the building with Ukrainian army, national guard and security forces.
The Ukrainian forces brought armoured personnel carriers into the town and the building caught fire at one point. The rebels then fled into the town.
>
Mariupol, an important industrial and shipping centre in the Donetsk region that is planning to hold a secessionist referendum on Sunday, has been the focus of frequent skirmishes in recent days. But Friday's action appeared to be a concerted effort by several forces to claw back control from rebels.
http://www.thestar.com.my/News/World/2014/05/09/About-20-proRussia-rebels-killed-in-fighting-in-east-Ukraine--minister/
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)"The only position towards terrorists is shoot to kill," he said. "I ask all of you, the friends and the enemies, put all your conflicts and interests aside, the country is at stake. It is time to recollect our strength and to come out of this situation."
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ukraine-crisis/russias-victory-day-takes-deadly-turn-ukrainian-city-mariupol-n101176
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Only part of the U.S. government are teabaggers...
Only part of the British government is Plaid Cymru.
Only part of the German government is the Party of Bible-Abiding Christians.
Only part of the Itialian government is the Monarchist Alliance.
I doubt we collectively define these governments by these particular parties (however, I do understand that bias often compels us to hold one thing to a much higher standard than we may hold a similar thing. Part of human nature, I'd guess...)
IAMWE
(9 posts)Under any label.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Fuck a war!
pampango
(24,692 posts)Show some restraint. They are your citizens even if they differ in ethnicity, language or religion.
IAMWE
(9 posts)Up until last month they were concerned citizens.
I guess it all depend where you are protesting.
I hope the "government" doesn't start using tanks in lieu of dialog.
So sad :'(
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Attacked them at the police station.
I guess maybe the police were on the side of the separatists.
I just heard it on the Beeb.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Igel
(35,300 posts)Scrap Avakov's "20 killed." So far they're officially reporting 9, with added reporting of 2 more bodies of policemen found in the armory, dead from inhalation.
One version says "police were in the building and had occupied it; refusing to obey orders, the military attacked them and killed X many."
I can't find coherence in a version that says the police and the military attacked at the same time.
A third version has the the police trying to seize the building back from gunman--nobody says "successfully." But then the building was surrounded by separatist reinforcements arrived to fight the police. The military showed up to support the police, sandwiching the separatists between part of the building and on the street.
The videos, apart from the assumption that the entirety of the Ukr military and National guard are "right sectors," show armored motorized vehicles moving in. Not a question. But everybody that is a political dissenter or suspected of being a Ukr supporter is, from the POV of the separatists fascist and "right sector". It's a general term of abuse at this point and can't be taken at face value.
But the videos also include shots from inside the building where there are men and women apparently at peace inside. The building is being surrounded and then assaulted by "black men." Perhaps those taking the videos are "separatist" occupiers and the men in black are police, but that seems hardly likely. Why?
Because the men in black also are seen celebrating the "seizing" of a broken amphibious vehicle (which was reported as seized, even though as soon as the military returned to tow it off only civilians were left; video shows it being looted, though, carefully edited to not show the faces of those stealing arms from the vehicle). The black men are also carrying off the wounded--but apparently are being jeered. Black men have turned up in a few cases, though, and I'm hard put to categorize them. Green men are invariably separatists.
Still, if the men in black were police they wouldn't celebrate "seizing" the vehicle. Wrong side. I can see how some would jeer separatists. Support isn't 100% for them, esp. if they're the ones that triggered the "invasion."
It also doesn't make sense that Saenko, the DAI chief (think "subsection of police" , was kidnapped before the military showed up and, according to reports, killed. If the separatists and police were on the same side, that's unlikely (unless he called in the troops).
When the military shows up the military are in camo, not in black. And the two groups are fighting as far as I can tell.
Still can't make sense of either narrative; there's always something that fails to fit. RT's or Avakov's. I lean towards AVakov's. And I suspect that the police ousted the gunmen (so they could be in the armory), were under seige by separatists in black, plus civilian supporters who invariably are there and provide a kind of human shielf for them; the men in black were then caught by the military. Still don't buy Avakov's #s.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)They do not call journalism 'the rough draft of history' for nothing. It is usually a good idea to wait and reserve judgement on initial reports out of complex and fluid situations. People forget this on peril of making themselves look like knee-jerk idiots....
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)The dead and injured are carried out of a burning building; more bodies lying in the street; prolonged exchanges of fire as armoured carriers smash through barricades; and, with the violence, anger and calls for revenge.
This is Mariupol, in eastern Ukraine, after a day of bloody strife that slid Ukraine further towards civil war. The countrys caretaker government can be accused of trying to blow out flickering hopes of peace by launching a military operation on one of the most revered anniversaries in the Russian-speaking half of the country the commemoration of victory over Nazi Germany.
The military action is accompanied by stridently aggressive rhetoric from politicians in Kiev who are crowing about the numbers of terrorists killed and threatening further lethal punishment.
By the evening there are differing body counts ranging from 20 to five, with around another 25 injured. But the accuracy of statistics has meant little in this confrontation. What matters is the perception. For many in this port on the Azov Sea, today greatly reinforced the view relentlessly promoted by the separatist leadership that fascists from the west of the country are coming to attack.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-crisis-bloody-assault-in-mariupol-dashes-hopes-of-avoiding-civil-war-9347972.html
IAMWE
(9 posts)Since inception.
No wonder a lot of Ukrainians seem to have strong concerns brining them into the streets.
Hopefully our gov officials can reign them in... but will they listen?
:fingers-crossed:
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)to take over the "caretaker" coup government.
This is what happened in Ukrainian Parliament yesterday...
The Svoboda party...
This is the government appointed Minister of Freedom of Speech a Svodoba party member...
#t=22
They're backed by the thugs creating atrocities in Ukraine that wear armbands and mask their faces. This is what they did in Odessa... WARNING: GRAPHIC PHOTOS...
http://nsnbc.me/2014/05/10/odessa-massacre-detail-investigation/
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)<snip>
In Mariupol, there was a mood of rage after the Ukrainian army left, intensified by the fact that many people were intoxicated from the earlier Victory Day celebrations. Several fights broke out in the crowd, but the main anger was reserved for Kiev.
"We will never live with these filthy fascists again. . Ukraine as a country is over," said Vladimir, 27. "Imagine coming here on Victory Day and doing this."
At Café Arbat, where pools of blood were visible on the ground, one of the waitresses, Lena, said that three unarmed men had been shot by Ukrainian soldiers.
"I wasn't for one side or the other until today, but after seeing this, I have the feeling I want to take up a weapon myself and kill these people," she said. "I'm 50 years old and they made me fall on the ground and hide from bullets, in my own cafe, in my own town."
<snip>
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Ukraines security forces conceded the streets of the second biggest city in Donetsk region to pro-Russian protesters on Saturday after one of the bloodiest military operations of the crisis.
Using BMP armoured combat vehicles, the army drove dozens of insurgents out of the police headquarters in the city of Mariupol on Friday, killing at least five people and possibly as many as 21.
After this battle, however, the security forces then withdrew to a chain of checkpoints around Mariupol, leaving the city itself, with a population of 500,000 people, under the de facto control of the pro-Russians.
This comes one day before the leaders of the Donetsk Peoples Republic are due to hold a referendum on independence for the region on Sunday.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10821846/Ukraine-security-forces-cede-Mariupol-streets-to-pro-Russian-protesters-after-deadly-clash.html
bemildred
(90,061 posts)DONETSK, Ukraine (CNN) -
Pro-Russian activists in eastern Ukraine insisted Saturday that a controversial referendum on greater autonomy will go ahead -- despite calls from Kiev and Moscow not to hold the vote amid soaring tensions.
The referendum is due to take place on Sunday in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine, where armed groups have been involved in deadly clashes with Ukrainian security forces in recent days.
At least seven people were killed and 39 others were injured in violence Friday in the flashpoint southeastern city of Mariupol, the Donetsk regional health department said. Acting Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said the casualty toll is higher.
http://www.ksat.com/news/prorussian-activists-referendum-will-happen/25911644