Assange Threatens to Release Snowden info that Greenwald says Could Endanger Lives
Source: christian science monitor
The presumed tension between anti-secrecy activist Julian Assange and Glenn Greenwald, the arch-disseminator of NSA documents provided by Edward Snowden, erupted into the open yesterday on Twitter. The two sparred publicly over Greenwald's decision to redact a piece of information from a recent story.
The story released yesterday and written by Greenwald and two colleagues, alleges that the US is "secretly intercepting, recording, and archiving the audio of virtually every cell phone conversation on the island nation of the Bahamas." The story, published on First Look Media's Intercept channel, also says that the US is harvesting cellphone metadata from four other countries and names three of them - Mexico, The Philippines and Kenya.
The fifth country? The article says "The Intercept is not naming (it) in response to specific, credible concerns that doing so could lead to increased violence."
Assange is generally assumed to write the Wikileaks Twitter feed (and has been watched doing so.) And he wasn't happy at Greenwald's decision to withhold information.
Read more: http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Backchannels/2014/0520/Assange-threatens-to-release-Snowden-info-that-Greenwald-says-could-endanger-lives
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)At one point I may have thought that they were doing something for a greater good but...now it's about ego, fame, headlines and some other twisted/weirdo shit.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)appacom
(296 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Get over it. They aren't robots. Your description sound more like the people who post here that aren't infuriated with NSA/DEA.
Cha
(297,304 posts)Response to Cha (Reply #14)
Post removed
Cha
(297,304 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)Thats right. A whistleblower breaks the law to obtain 50,000 documents, he flees the country to escape prosecution and jail time, he hands over these 50,000 pages to a handful of individuals in return for their promise to present these documents to the public, six months pass, and the public gets 1% of these documents. But please, wait. This is not all. Far more interesting and troubling things happen meanwhile.
The main wanna-be reporter begins his relentless pursuit of high dollars in return for for what? In return for exclusive interviews where he would discuss some of this material. In return for a very lucrative book deal where he would expose a few extra pages of these 50,000-page documents. In return for a partnership with and extremely high salary from a Mega Corporation (think 1%) where he would hmmmm, well, it is not very clear: maybe in return for sitting on and never releasing some of these documents, or, releasing a few select pages?
Thats right. The culprit is able to use his role in the whistleblower case, and his de facto ownership of the whistleblowers 50,000-page evidence, to gain huge sums of money, fame, a mega corporate position, book and movie deals yet, making sure that the public would never see more than a few percent of the incriminating evidence.
Of course, secondhand checkbook profiteers tend to be very savvy, able to blow smoke, muddy water, and obscure their real deeds and true personhoods. This particular one is famous for spending years as an ambulance-chasing style attorney, where all he had to do was to write dozens of pages to make cases that were never cases, or make real cases appear as if they never were.
See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/12/08/checkbook-journalism-leaking-to-the-highest-bidders/#sthash.esuPxh6S.dpuf
You're spot on Soap. Even Anonymous was discussing showing up at GG's events to protest his greed. This has never been about the public good for these guys.
Gus @Gus_802
Follow
ICYMI: When Greenwald Met Snowden
8:28 AM - 19 May 2014
73 Retweets 21 favorites Reply
Retweet
Favorite
TOD
Tarheel
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)How the hell do you do that, when this asshole stands to make gazillions of dollars off of someone else's loss of freedom? Sadly, that pic speaks volumes.
Cha
(297,304 posts)with another self-righteous asshole..
Julian Assange Is Angry At Glenn Greenwald And Hes Not Going To Take It Anymore
http://www.buzzfeed.com/miriamberger/julian-assange-is-angry-at-glenn-greenwald-and-hes-not-going
Watch out.. War of the LEAKERS!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)They, supposedly, were talking about protesting GG's affiliation with Pierre Omidyar, a true One Percenter. They, allegedly, are pissed that GG is only back in the country to sign mega$$$bucks movie & book deals. I can see where this is going, and GG, for the first time may be in WAY over his head. The backlash cometh!
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Nothing but a dog-and-pony show...
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)24601
(3,962 posts)releasing info he acknowledges is dangerous and premeditated murder if it results in death.
JI7
(89,252 posts)The Stranger
(11,297 posts)WTF?
24601
(3,962 posts)way, someone has information essential to safeguard the safety of the President. He publishes it knowing that
terrorists can use it to assassinate the President, and they do. Any doubt he is directly responsible for the murder? No doubt in my mind he has been directly culpable. Another example, the information released is how to build a bomb and plan a bomb that kills 50 people. How is that not accessory to 1st degree murder. Or consider that the information released identifies an individual who worked undercover in a terrorist cell, which then murders him and his family in retaliation.
in any of those circumstances, He is clearly enabling a murder, or murders, when he knew it was the likely consequence.
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)Thanks for playing.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Guessing, but I'd bet on it.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Response to JI7 (Original post)
JackRiddler This message was self-deleted by its author.