Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OneCrazyDiamond

(2,032 posts)
Wed May 21, 2014, 12:58 PM May 2014

Federal funds earmarked to offset Affordable Care Act insurer losses

Source: LA Times

The Obama administration has quietly adjusted key provisions of its signature healthcare law to potentially make billions of additional taxpayer dollars available to the insurance industry if companies providing coverage through the Affordable Care Act lose money.

The move was buried in hundreds of pages of new regulations issued late last week. It comes as part of an intensive administration effort to hold down premium increases for next year, a top priority for the White House as the rates will be announced ahead of this fall's congressional elections.

Administration officials for months have denied charges by opponents that they plan a "bailout" for insurance companies providing coverage under the healthcare law.

They continue to argue that most insurers shouldn't need to substantially increase premiums because safeguards in the healthcare law will protect them over the next several years.

Read more: http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-80263091/




Can we hear about single payer yet? More money taken from Healthcare for actual people and given to Financial Services, the virtual people.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Psephos

(8,032 posts)
17. Just a thought, but the VA health system is single payer.
Wed May 21, 2014, 08:42 PM
May 2014

I'm a single-payer advocate myself and have been for a long time, but it's getting harder to trust the US government to do much right these days.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
5. This "ear-mark" and "adjustment" was not "buried" in the law ...
Wed May 21, 2014, 01:16 PM
May 2014

it has been fully vetted since the last time the gop raised the "bail-out" issue, that doesn't exist.

 

TheNutcracker

(2,104 posts)
6. If you don't earn more, how can they charge more, as it is the law to pay no more than 9%?
Wed May 21, 2014, 01:27 PM
May 2014

Single payer is coming.....I've said it all along. Only way.

Medicare was not single payer when set up. It was a mess! The court did it. We are on the way, hopefully. Boehner says "repeal and replace". They don't say with what.
And if they allow hikes in premiums, without earning more, then the mandate must go.

A MESS! That will lead to single payer. But we better hold on to the senate!

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. all this does is make sure that insurance companies that actually
Wed May 21, 2014, 01:32 PM
May 2014

provide coverage for treatment don't go out of business as a result.

because they don't want insurance companies denying coverage and treatment.

IronLionZion

(45,457 posts)
8. Because people are using too much healthcare?
Wed May 21, 2014, 01:36 PM
May 2014

Lots of newly insured people. The insurers have reported that most everyone who signed up has paid premiums. Some of the big players who stayed out last time are entering the marketplaces next enrollment period. And I guarantee more people will sign up if they had waited because of technical issues with the websites.

I'm more concerned about the nonprofit co-ops. I hope they can maintain solvency. Some of them have folded already.

And then there's the medicaid expansion. Idiotic red states opting out is not a way to balance the books for a program.

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
11. Good for the administration. As I pointed out a month ago, there is a lot that can
Wed May 21, 2014, 01:42 PM
May 2014

go wrong, since the SCOTUS threw a big monkey wrench into the ACA by letting states opt out of Medicaid. It was unfair to force the privates to risk losing their shirts being forced to take on the care of massively ill people who should have been covered under the Medicaid expansion. It is also unfair to force people who bought ACA insurance to pay the bills for the folks who should have been on the Medicaid expansion. Basically, this a back door way for the administration to help cover the ones who should have been covered by Medicaid--the ones whose state governments actually passed laws preventing their own county hospital authorities from dealing directly with the federal government.

Glad to see that someone is actually doing their job. Hats off to the Obama Administration. They are doing a mighty fine job in a might bad political climate.



Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal funds earmarked t...