Prince Charles 'should abdicate' after comparing Putin to Hitler, says MP
Source: Guardian UK
Labour MP Mike Gapes calls for prince to 'abdicate and stand for election' if he wants to make controversial statements
Prince Charles is facing a call for his abdication and a frosty response in Moscow after reportedly comparing Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler over Russia's annexation of Crimea.
Charles blundered into the international crisis over Russia's actions in Ukraine during a tour of Canada, when he spoke to a woman who fled the Nazis and lost family members during the Holocaust.
According to the Daily Mail, the prince compared the Russian president to the Nazi leader when talking to Marienne Ferguson, a museum volunteer who moved to Canada with her Jewish family when she was just 13. "Now Putin is doing just about the same as Hitler," Charles is reported to have said.
Charles's remarks have been criticised across the political spectrum in Britain: the Labour MP Mike Gapes called for his abdication, while the outspoken Ukip leader, Nigel Farage, said the prince was wrong to get involved.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/may/21/prince-charles-vladimir-putin-adolf-hitler
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)EmilyAnne
(2,769 posts)Just asinine.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)EmilyAnne
(2,769 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)''We live in our fantasies and endure our realities.'' ~Robert Anton Wilson
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Psephos
(8,032 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)that assertion with facts. Furthermore he didn't say Putin was Hitler he said Putin actions were similiar to Hitler's. Nothing wrong with stating the truth.
CSStrowbridge
(267 posts)Let's see...
Putin has begun land grabs in order to protect "ethnic Russians" and has done nothing about neo-nazis kidnapping and torturing suspected gays.
Yep. I think the comparison is apt.
T_i_B
(14,749 posts)Sometimes prince Charles puts his foot in it. Not on this occasion.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)short shrift to a disturbing high level remark that diminishes the truly serious nature of the holocaust?
massive testes.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)It was similar to what Hitler did in 1938. He wasn't trying to equate it to the Holocaust.
reddread
(6,896 posts)despicable indiscretion from high level observers like that goes well appreciated by warmongers.
just sayin.
MADem
(135,425 posts)he wasn't writing an editorial for the Times.
And he was right.
Maybe Putin shouldn't run around stealing chunks of other people's countries if he doesn't want to be likened to a guy named Adolph who did the same thing.
LibertyLover
(4,788 posts)is correct. In this case Charles was comparing the land grabs engineered by Putin to those engaged in by Hitler. No Godwinning at all on Charles' part.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Gosh, I don't see how a woman who fled the Nazis and lost family members during the Holocaust could possibly fail to appreciate the nuance in the Prince's statement. I'm glad you understood it, too.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,385 posts)The prince then said And now Putin is doing just about the same as Hitler.
I must say that I agree with him and am sure a lot of people do. I was very surprised that he made the comment as I know they (members of the Royal Family) arent meant to say these things but it was very heartfelt and honest.
I told the prince that while my family and I were lucky to get a permit to travel, many of my other relatives had permits but were unable to get out before war broke out on September 1. They were sent to the concentration camps and died.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2634400/Putin-behaving-just-like-Hitler-says-Charles-Princes-controversial-verdict-Russian-leaders-invasion-Ukraine.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Monk06
(7,675 posts)Kaleva
(36,356 posts)sofa king
(10,857 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)It's not like Charles is or amounts to anything....
daleo
(21,317 posts)That sounds like a denial of free speech, kind of like a certain person whose name started with capital h might agree with.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)Try reading before jerking your knees.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)As a constitutional hereditary-monarch he has strict limits on political speech. He can't have it both ways.
- A monarchy is a form of government in which sovereignty is actually or nominally embodied in a single individual (the monarch).
All those freebies, those castles, ladies-in-waiting and horse-drawn carriages? That's the price.
- He can say whatever he wants the minute he gives it all up.
former9thward
(32,093 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)former9thward
(32,093 posts)Did Harry apologize for a fake picture? Did the BBC publish a fake picture?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4170083.stm
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)The neoconservative underground posters take sides with Prince Charles over a center left politician.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)If the people want to change the system then they should speak up but he shoukd not abdicate for that comment.
Putin is a creep imo.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)--- Yeah, I know...
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)And one one cares.
This is just silliness.
Blue Owl
(50,523 posts)n/t
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)''Authority, when first detecting chaos at its heels, will entertain the vilest schemes to save its orderly facade.''
~V
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)off the peoples taxes.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,212 posts)the Prime Minister; but I think they could have a rather lower salary without risking starvation; and I don't think that, in the 21st century, it should be hereditary.
Whatever you think of monarchy, Elizabeth Windsor has IMO done a good job as figurehead president. If she did abdicate and stand for election, I think she would in fact get elected by quite a large majority against most likely alternatives. I am not at all sure that the same would hold for Charles!
As regards the specific comment: I intensely dislike Putin, but he ain't Hitler. Lots of countries and leaders have made unjustifiable land-grabs, including a number of Charles' ancestors. Putin is IMO comparable to the Godfather of the Mafia, but not to Hitler.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Ilford South MP Mike Gapes yesterday faced accusations he was a Putin apologist after criticising Prince Charles for comments comparing the Russian president to Hitler.
The Labour politician, a former Foreign Affairs Select Committee chair, suggested the Prince of Wales take a lesson in discretion from his mother after a former Polish war refugee claimed the prince said Vladimir Putins actions in Ukraine were not unlike Hitlers takeover of countries in the build-up to the Second World War.
My position is that our Queen has been fantastic because she is seen and not heard, he said.
She never makes any controversial comments and thats why shes been so popular. [Prince Charles] could do with taking a lesson from his mother.
http://www.ilfordrecorder.co.uk/news/news/mike_gapes_mp_accused_of_putin_apologism_after_prince_charles_snipe_1_3611571
Aside from that the fact is nobody knows exactly what his nibs did say.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)"Abdicate" FFS that is what the reigning monarch does not one of the nobles.
He means that the Prince should renounce his titles and abandon his right to succeed. Not a bad idea but not for this particular storm in a teacup
treestar
(82,383 posts)What effect has it had? Has it harmed international relations between the two countries? Everyone knows the Prince has no political power.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,874 posts)Poor Charles.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)perfectly.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Wolf Frankula
(3,602 posts)Everybody knows that Chucky Jugears is dangerously inbred. He really can't help himself.
Wolf
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)JCMach1
(27,575 posts)probably the shoe fits pretty well.