Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Computers are learning to read emotion, and the business world can’t wait. By Raffi Khatchadourian
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/01/19/know-feel. . .
n October, Kaliouby took the Acela to New York to speak at a conference, called Strata + Hadoop World, at the Javits Center. More than five thousand specialists in Big Data had come from around the countrybelievers in the faith that transformative patterns exist in the zeros and ones that sustain modern life. The talks ranged from Industrial Internet to How Goldman Sachs Is Using Knowledge to Create an Information Edge. Some of the attendees wore badges for well-known corporations (Microsoft, Dell, G.E.); others were for companies I hadnt heard of (Polynumeral, Metanautix). While waiting to enter the main hall, I stood beside one of the few women there. Her badge simply said U.S. Government.
In the darkened hall, audience members opened laptops, and their screens glowed. In the greenroom, Kaliouby reviewed her notes and did breathing exercises. Onstage, she declared that it was the first time a scientist in her field had been invited to join the Big Data conversation: a throwaway line, but one with a remarkable implicationthat even emotions could be quantified, aggregated, leveraged.
She said that her company had analyzed more than two million videos, of respondents in eighty countries. This is data we have never had before, she said. When Affectiva began, she had trained the software on just a few hundred expressions. But once she started working with Millward Brown hundreds of thousands of people on six continents began turning on Web cams to watch ads for testing, and all their emotional responsesnatural reactions, in relatively uncontrolled settingsflowed back to Kalioubys team.
Affdex can now read the nuances of smiles better than most people can. As the companys database of emotional reactions grows, the software is getting better at reading other expressions. Before the conference, Kaliouby had told me about a project to upgrade the detection of furrowed eyebrows. A brow furrow is a very important indicator of confusion or concentration, and it can be a negative facial expression, she said. A lot of our customers want to know if their ad is offending people, or not really connecting. So we kicked off this experiment, using a whole bunch of parameters: should the computer consider the entire face, the eye region, just the brows? Should it look at two eyebrows together, or one and then the other? By the time Kaliouby arrived in New York, Affdex had run the tests on eighty thousand brow furrows. Onstage, she presented the results: Our accuracy jumped to over ninety per cent.
. . . more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1192 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Computers are learning to read emotion, and the business world can’t wait. By Raffi Khatchadourian (Original Post)
swag
Jan 2015
OP
They're putting cameras & microphone receivers directly into your new digital tv,
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#2
OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)1. Wait till Comcast figures out what I really think about them!
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)2. They're putting cameras & microphone receivers directly into your new digital tv,
so I imagine they'll know everything in real time!
National Spy Agency: "Nothing is beyond our reach."
IDemo
(16,926 posts)3. There's technology to deal with the cameras:
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)4. Here's the Henson film the article references
From watching this, one thing is crystal clear: Jim Henson liked weed. A LOT.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)5. I hope they learn to recognize passive aggression
because I don't like to be forced into buying any thing.