Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Madness of Funding the Pentagon to “Cover the Globe”
from TomDispatch:
Military Strategy? Who Needs It?
The Madness of Funding the Pentagon to Cover the Globe
By William D. Hartung
President Obama and Senator John McCain, who have clashed on almost every conceivable issue, do agree on one thing: the Pentagon needs more money. Obama wants to raise the Pentagons budget for fiscal year 2016 by $35 billion more than the caps that exist under current law allow. McCain wants to see Obama his $35 billion and raise him $17 billion more. Last week, the House and Senate Budget Committees attempted to meet Obamas demands by pressing to pour tens of billions of additional dollars into the uncapped supplemental war budget.
What will this new avalanche of cash be used for? A major ground war in Iraq? Bombing the Assad regime in Syria? A permanent troop presence in Afghanistan? More likely, the bulk of the funds will be wielded simply to take pressure off the Pentagons base budget so it can continue to pay for staggeringly expensive projects like the F-35 combat aircraft and a new generation of ballistic missile submarines. Whether the enthusiastic budgeteers in the end succeed in this particular maneuver to create a massive Pentagon slush fund, the effort represents a troubling development for anyone who thinks that Pentagon spending is already out of hand.
Mind you, such funds would be added not just to a Pentagon budget already running at half-a-trillion dollars annually, but to the actual national security budget, which is undoubtedly close to twice that. It includes items like work on nuclear weapons tucked away at the Department of Energy, that Pentagon supplementary war budget, the black budget of the Intelligence Community, and war-related expenditures in the budgets of the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Homeland Security.
Despite the jaw-dropping resources available to the national security state, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair General Martin Dempsey recently claimed that, without significant additional infusions of cash, the U.S. military wont be able to execute the strategy with which it has been tasked. As it happens, Dempseys remark unintentionally points the way to a dramatically different approach to whats still called defense spending. Instead of seeking yet more of it, perhaps its time for the Pentagon to abandon its costly and counterproductive military strategy of covering the globe.
A Cold War Strategy for the Twenty-First Century
Even to begin discussing this subject means asking the obvious question: Does the U.S. military have a strategy worthy of the name? As President Dwight D. Eisenhower put it in his farewell address in 1961, defense requires a balance between cost and hoped for advantage and between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable. Eisenhower conveniently omitted a third category: things that shouldnt have been done in the first place -- on his watch, for instance, the CIAs coups in Iran and Guatemala that overthrew democratic governments or, in our century, the Bush administrations invasion and occupation of Iraq. But Eisenhowers underlying point holds. Strategy involves making choices. Bottom line: current U.S. strategy fails this test abysmally. ..................(more)
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175973/tomgram%3A_william_hartung%2C_your_money_at_war_everywhere/#more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 703 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Madness of Funding the Pentagon to “Cover the Globe” (Original Post)
marmar
Mar 2015
OP
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/sites/default/files/images/a_story_images/christian_nation_A.jpg
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2015
#1
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)1. http://www.rightwingwatch.org/sites/default/files/images/a_story_images/christian_nation_A.jpg
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)2. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Bombs_pic.jpg