How One Man Laid the Groundwork for Today’s Crisis in the Middle East..guess who?
The only person Henry Kissinger flattered more than President Richard Nixon was Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the shah of Iran. In the early 1970s, the shah, sitting atop an enormous reserve of increasingly expensive oil and a key figure in Nixon and Kissingers move into the Middle East, wanted to be dealt with as a serious person. He expected his country to be treated with the same respect Washington showed other key Cold War allies like West Germany and Great Britain. As Nixons national security adviser and, after 1973, secretary of state, Kissingers job was to pump up the shah, to make him feel like he truly was the king of kings.
Reading the diplomatic record, its hard not to imagine his weariness as he prepared for his sessions with Pahlavi, considering just what gestures and words would be needed to make it clear that his majesty truly mattered to Washington, that he was valued beyond compare. Lets see, an aide who was helping Kissinger get ready for one such meeting said, the shah will want to talk about Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf, the Kurds, and Brezhnev.
During another prep, Kissinger was told that the shah wants to ride in an F-14. Silence ensued. Then Kissinger began to think aloud about how to flatter the monarch into abandoning the idea. We can say, he began, that if he has his heart set on it, okay, but the president would feel easier if he didnt have that one worry in 10,000 [that the plane might crash]. The shah will be flattered. Once, Nixon asked Kissinger to book the entertainer Danny Kaye for a private performance for the shah and his wife.
The 92-year-old Kissinger has a long history of involvement in Iran, and his recent opposition to Barack Obamas Iran nuclear deal, while relatively subdued by present Washington standards, matters. In it lies a certain irony, given his own largely unexamined record in the region. Kissingers criticism has focused mostly on warning that the deal might provoke a regional nuclear arms race as Sunni states led by Saudi Arabia line up against Shia Iran. We will live in a proliferated world, he said in testimony before the Senate. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed co-authored with another former secretary of state, George Shultz, Kissinger worried that, as the region trends toward sectarian upheaval and state collapse, the disequilibrium of power might likely tilt toward Tehran.
Of all people, Kissinger knows well how easily the best-laid plans can go astray and careen toward disaster. The former diplomat is by no means solely responsible for the mess that is todays Middle East. There is, of course, George W. Bushs 2003 invasion of Iraq (which Kissinger supported). But he does bear far more responsibility for our proliferated worlds disequilibrium of power than anyone usually recognizes.
http://www.thenation.com/article/how-one-man-laid-the-groundwork-for-todays-crisis-in-the-middle-east/
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Up there with other war criminals in causing and prolonging death. Evil bastard is a good example for why there is no Just God.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)Another apple that does not belong to the US, taken anyway.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)SoS?
Of course, this is hill-bashing!
erronis
(15,306 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)at the time. thanks for the enlightening. My initial answer was Dick Cheney/Rumsfeld.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,370 posts)Thanks for the thread, Ichingcarpenter.