Allegations of voter fraud follow Hillary Clinton campaign across nation
This was too late for LBN. Copied verbatim, no editorializing form me. Main stream media report:
Allegations of voter fraud follow Hillary Clinton campaign across nation
Arizona is just the latest state where allegations of voting irregularities have been claimed.
As the Huffington Post reports:
Beginning in Iowa and climaxing with the holy mess that occurred in Arizona, the Democratic presidential primaries have been a Wagnerian Ring Cycle of electoral shenanigans, cynical rule-bending and outright voter suppression.
Much more at link: http://ktar.com/story/1029529/allegations-of-voter-fraud-follow-hillary-clinton-campaign-across-nation/
________
couldn't copy much do to formatting and paragraph breaks.
dchill
(38,505 posts)"Sounds like a plan."
RandySF
(58,908 posts)Delegitimize at every turn.
Unicorn
(424 posts)And, I witnessed it in my states' election which still went over-whelmingly for Bernie.
How is this out of the Republican play book?
Do you declare everything you don't want to hear, out of the Republican play book?
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)And he will soon. He's been pretty much told to by party leaders.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)Fla Dem
(23,691 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Speaking of delegitimatizing, here's your most recent hide, speaking of the state of kentucky, and bernie's prospects therein:
Obama would've won that primary if he were white.
Real funny comment to make, since as you note, Hillary DID win that state, and as noted in a response to you, is projected to do so again.
And then there's this...
In all my years, I've never seen a campaign as Sanders 2016 and their supporters. Sanders is a lucky man to such devoted henchmen do the dirty work as he wags his finger of judgement. Lee Atwater would have been proud.
I don't think you get to try to claim others are delegitimatizing anything, RandySF. Not with your clear record on the subject.
Fla Dem
(23,691 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)Do you think David Brock is Hillary's "Karl Rove?" Or is Hillary herself playing the part of KKKaarl? Or is it just her lackies all over the country who are KKKarling, causing the voter suppression, the long lines because of closed polls (because they are so supposedly expensive), the po, po states just unable to afford an election?
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)against AZ even when she won there?
So why is the official in NY whose "error" in dropping thousands of names from the Dem voter lists a Republican?
Those NY names were dropped in an area largely supportive of HRC as shown by those who voted there, so it is fair to infer that her candidacy was likely disadvantaged more by this. Of course, if the GOP clerk whose "error" caused the names to be dropped had enough ESP to know in advance that every single one of these was a Sanders voter, then we can know for sure that it was fraud against Bernie.
Most of the "fraud" allegations seem to originate with and are perpetuated by a vocal minority of SBS supporters, especially those who are most afflicted with CDS and likely never Dems to begin with. The vocal minority becomes most zealously rabid whenever Bernie loses. It is certainly a trend - and not one that has ever been seen at the level of Democratic primaries in my lifetime - which has been pretty long.
Things are getting so bad that every time I see that Hillary wins a primary, I know just as night follows day that there will be allegations of fraud from this same group. Frankly, it is really pissing me off. These are indeed GOPer tactics, brought into the Dem race by non-Dems.
Darb
(2,807 posts)It doesn't play well in Victimlandia.
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)I see what you did there. Drip, drip, drip. Trying to tie Hillary to fraud. I agree with earlier poster - typical Republican playbook.
Maybe a better headline would have been - "fraud follows Bernie . . ."
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)My Hillary supporting friend had to give up on voting because she didn't have time to stand in Helen Purcell's 4 hour voter line in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Hillary lost that vote because of Helen Purcell's shenanigans.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)This is a proportional race, so a reduced margin of victory means fewer delegates than she might have otherwise earned.
But in any case, you've clearly implied that you don't much care that my friend could not vote.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)Too bad.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)As more than one commenter at the link points out: PLEASE stop using the term VOTER FRAUD... It isn't the voters being fraudulent... it is the system that is being fraudulent.. so the proper term to use is ELECTION FRAUD.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)against the voters.
Darb
(2,807 posts)But somehow you bernies seem to want to tie it to Hillary Clinton when you know damn good and well, and the evidence is clear, and the strategy is clear, that this has been in place since long before Bernie left socialism behind and joined the Democratic Party.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)... quit with the victimhood.
It's unbecoming.
Bluerome
(129 posts)When you come to terms with Bernie's loss you might start being more reasonable. As it is, these constant bitter threads of yours don't really accomplish anything. Just commiserating negativity without reasonable balance
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)Bluerome
(129 posts)See you on the flip side
Faux pas
(14,681 posts)by cheating us.
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)the plethora of front organizations. What a wonderfully "diverse" Democratic Party base she has.
K&R
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Classic Third Way triangulation. They get the best of both worlds.