Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,476 posts)
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 02:39 PM Sep 2016

A Safe Space for Unsafe Spaces

A University of Chicago letter welcoming freshmen with the warning they would arrive at a campus committed to “freedom of inquiry and expression” prompted a national debate on restoring free speech on campuses. The most interesting lesson is why it will be so hard for other universities to follow Chicago’s lead.

The letter rejected today’s higher-education fads: “We do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.” Rigorous but civilized debate “may challenge you and even cause discomfort.”

(snip)

Brown University was widely mocked last year for setting up a safe space for students “with cookies, coloring books, bubbles, Play-Doh, calming music, pillows, blankets and a video of frolicking puppies.” This year Brown’s president, Christina Paxson, declared in her convocation address: “Suppressing ideas at a university is akin to turning off the power at a factory.” Professors are terrified they will be set upon for an inadvertent offense, as happened last year at Yale when a professor was forced out for suggesting students could pick their own Halloween costumes without instructions from the administration. Recent surveys find most university students resent having to censor themselves out of fear of offending someone else’s beliefs.

(snip)

One factor that sets Chicago apart from other campuses is that it can rely only on serious academics for its reputation. President Robert Hutchins abolished the football team in 1939—despite many Big 10 championships—in order to focus on the life of the mind. Hutchins justified having communists speak on campus by arguing the way to rebut objectionable ideas “lies through open discussion rather than through prohibition.”

The focus on academics also helps keep politicians and celebrities at arm’s length. In the 1950s, Chicago’s mayor asked the university to award Queen Elizabeth II an honorary degree when she visited the city. “We’re happy to consider it,” the university replied. “Please send copies of her scholarly work.”

(snip)

Ending the infantilizing of college students will take resolve. Next time administrators get demands to cancel a conservative’s speech or censor academic discussions, they can cite former Chicago President Hanna Gray’s pithy summary: “Education should not be intended to make people comfortable. It is meant to make them think.”

http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-safe-space-for-unsafe-spaces-1474235375

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Safe Space for Unsafe Spaces (Original Post) question everything Sep 2016 OP
One of the best things about going away to college murielm99 Sep 2016 #1

murielm99

(30,736 posts)
1. One of the best things about going away to college
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 06:31 PM
Sep 2016

was my exposure to new and dangerous ideas. That is how I grew. I learned how to think and how to choose.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»A Safe Space for Unsafe S...