Op-Ed: Will Trump be the end of the Pax Americana?
by Max Boot Jan 22 2017
With the America First emphasis in his truculent inaugural address, Donald Trump has signaled that a radical reorientation of American foreign policy may be in the offing. For more than 70 years, the United States has been the worlds leading champion of free trade, democracy, and international institutions, particularly in Europe and East Asia. But for how much longer?
In his interview last week with the Times of London and the German newspaper Bild, Trump called NATO obsolete, promoted the breakup of the European Union and suggested that German Chancellor Angela Merkel, leader of one of Americas most important allies, is no more trustworthy than Russias anti-American dictator, Vladimir Putin. In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Trump sent the dollar tumbling after he said he favored a weaker dollar so as to reduce the trade deficit, abandoning our traditional policy. Trumps other pronouncements and, even more strongly, his protectionist personnel picks, indicate that he may be gearing up for a trade war against nations such as China and Mexico that he views as unfair competitors. Protection will lead to great prosperity and strength, he claimed in his inaugural address, turning the lessons of the 1930s on their head.
Thus, coming after eight years of President Obamas lead from behind foreign policy, we may finally be seeing the long-predicted breakup of the Pax Americana not because of external pressures but because of an internal decision that the burden of global leadership is no longer worth shouldering. Putin is licking his chops, heaping praise on Trump and preparing to do great deals with the new president that will allow Russia to escape the sanctions imposed after its invasion of Ukraine. But the Russian strongman will never be a reliable American partner in endeavors such as fighting Islamic State; he is pursuing his own agenda of trying to reassemble the empire that Russia lost in 1991.
European leaders, by contrast, are palpably nervous, wondering how to cope with a post-American world. Merkel says, I think we Europeans have our fate in our own hands, but there is little reason to think the fractious and disjointed European Union can get its act together to replace the role played for decades by the United States as the guarantor of international order. Germany, while the strongest country on the continent, remains shackled by its post-World War II pacifism and isolationism. The United Kingdom is distracted by its negotiations to leave the EU. France is led by a deeply unpopular president (François Hollande has an approval rating of roughly 4%) who is likely to be replaced either by a pro-Russia extreme right-winger (Marine Le Pen) or a pro-Russia mainstream conservative (François Fillon). No other country in Europe is even capable of vying for leadership.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-boot-trump-reorients-us-foreign-policy-20170122-story.html
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)CincyDem
(6,358 posts)We haven't been shouldering global leadership. We've been asserting global control. Had we spent 2-3 Trillion overseas advancing humanity vs. waging war, I think we'd see a very different geopolitical landscape vis-a-vis both terrorism and Russian ascendancy.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)...by New World Order.
My expectations for this administration were abysmally low, and it is SOMEHOW worse by orders of magnitude. Honest to God, I cannot even believe 90% of what I see coming out of that cesspool is real.