Congress didn't just nuke the filibuster, it permanently politicized the Supreme Court
The process of confirming Supreme Court nominees has become far too politicized. And today, the Senate made it worse. Please note thats the Senate, not Republicans or Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. The politicization of the court began many years ago, and its roots run deep and broad. It reflects the increasing determination of presidents and their allies in Congress to nominate judges who wont surprise them on the court, as well as the growing role of interest groups that want to impose litmus tests on nominees to make sure theyll get the rulings they want.
For those who spent the morning on Mars, 44 Senate Democrats voted against the motion to shut off debate on the nomination of Judge Neil M. Gorsuch for the Supreme Court. Under Senate rules, that was enough to keep the filibuster going. But then McConnell used some procedural jujitsu to allow the chambers 52 Republicans to change those rules by a simple majority vote (instead of the usual two-thirds), eliminating the possibility of a filibuster on Supreme Court nominees.
For the record, my colleagues on the editorial board have opposed the filibuster in all its iterations for many years, in both Republican- and Democrat-controlled Senates. Ive always dissented from that position; I think the filibuster is an important and unique force for consensus in Congress.
Anyway, the predictable result of Thursdays votes is that controlling the Senate will now more clearly equate to controlling the composition of the Supreme Court. As long as the same party holds the White House and the Senate, there will be no need to pick judges who hold at least some appeal to the minority party those folks arent even speed bumps anymore, theyre just roadkill.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-nuclear-option-gorsuch-20170406-story.html
Cary
(11,746 posts)I say bring it on.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)I guess now that Trump's a "war-time President" it's back to business as usual "journalism"